<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darrin Hodges&#8230; Again. And for the last time.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386</link>
	<description>Anarchy and apathy battle it out on @ndy's blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: @ndy</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188965</link>
		<dc:creator>@ndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188965</guid>
		<description>You prefer wholemeal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You prefer wholemeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim QLD</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim QLD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188963</guid>
		<description>Like I said no idea. Mate if you think that[&#039;]s who you are dealing with you are far from the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said no idea. Mate if you think that[']s who you are dealing with you are far from the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ndy</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188960</link>
		<dc:creator>@ndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188960</guid>
		<description>&quot;We all understand that you have no concept at all when it comes to your perceived enemy.&quot;

Hmmm. Dunno &#039;bout that one Jim. I think there&#039;s a handful of ex-Stormfront moderators who might disagree with you on that.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2157/2052499196_79d6d6b413_m.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We all understand that you have no concept at all when it comes to your perceived enemy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm. Dunno &#8217;bout that one Jim. I think there&#8217;s a handful of ex-Stormfront moderators who might disagree with you on that.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2157/2052499196_79d6d6b413_m.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim QLD</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim QLD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188951</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should become a National Anarchist? Seems they are more open to change and willing to progress with time. Better than being locked into a doomed ideology like you prescribe to. Hell even National Socialists have expanded on the original concept. Not that you would know. We all understand that you have no concept at all when it comes to your perceived enemy. You just keep your head in the sand and hang on to outdated BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should become a National Anarchist? Seems they are more open to change and willing to progress with time. Better than being locked into a doomed ideology like you prescribe to. Hell even National Socialists have expanded on the original concept. Not that you would know. We all understand that you have no concept at all when it comes to your perceived enemy. You just keep your head in the sand and hang on to outdated BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim QLD</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188945</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim QLD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188945</guid>
		<description>Sorry @ndy nice try. No mate I live by the law of the land lucky for you. The Anarchism you have described above sounds more like Communism. So which one is it. Didn’t the evil Fash win that one any way? I don’t know about you but the only Anarchism I have ever known I learnt from listening to the Sex Pistols when I was a young Punk Rocker in the 70’s. I figure they had a better following than you will ever have. 

But we all grow up? Obvious you missed that.

“From what you’re inferring, you appear to believe that ‘anarchy’ gives you licence to commit murder.” No not at all. From what I read on this site it seems that many of the contributors here under current Australian Law would have no problem at all killing or murdering anyone you decide is a Fascist or a Nazi. That would be illegal don’t you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry @ndy nice try. No mate I live by the law of the land lucky for you. The Anarchism you have described above sounds more like Communism. So which one is it. Didn’t the evil Fash win that one any way? I don’t know about you but the only Anarchism I have ever known I learnt from listening to the Sex Pistols when I was a young Punk Rocker in the 70’s. I figure they had a better following than you will ever have. </p>
<p>But we all grow up? Obvious you missed that.</p>
<p>“From what you’re inferring, you appear to believe that ‘anarchy’ gives you licence to commit murder.” No not at all. From what I read on this site it seems that many of the contributors here under current Australian Law would have no problem at all killing or murdering anyone you decide is a Fascist or a Nazi. That would be illegal don’t you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ndy</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188939</link>
		<dc:creator>@ndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188939</guid>
		<description>Dear Jim,

On defamation, I asked a retired barrister for his advice.

On anarchy, you are mistaking the absence of rulers for chaos. In other words, confusing the popular misconception for the political philosophy with which I feel the greatest affinity and for which reason I describe myself as being one of its advocates.  My advice is that you begin to familiarise yourself with the history of anarchism as a social movement. One of the pre-eminent examples of the wide-scale implementation of anarchist ideas was that which occurred in &lt;a href=&quot;http://question-everything.mahost.org/Archive/chomskyspain.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spain&lt;/a&gt; for a brief period in the 1930s.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In Barcelona, industry and commerce were largely collectivized, and a wave of collectivization spread through rural areas, as well as towns and villages, in Aragon, Castile, and the Levante, and to a lesser but still significant extent in many parts of Catalonia, Asturias, Estremadura, and Andalusia. Military power was exercised by defense committees; social and economic organization took many forms, following in main outlines the program of the Saragossa Congress of the anarchist CNT (Confederacion Nacional del Trabajo) in May 1936. The revolution was &quot;apolitical,&quot; in the sense that its organs of power and administration remained separate from the central Republican government and, even after several anarchist leaders entered the government in the autumn of 1936, continued to function fairly independently until the revolution was finally crushed between the fascist and Communist-led Republican forces. The success of collectivization of industry and commerce in Barcelona impressed even highly unsympathetic observers such as Franz Borkenau. The scale of rural collectivization is indicated by these data from anarchist sources: in Aragon, 450 collectives with 500,000 members; in the Levante, 900 collectives accounting for about half the agricultural production and 70 percent of marketing in this, the richest agricultural region of Spain; in Castile, 300 collectives with about 100,000 members. In Catalonia, the bourgeois government headed by Luis Companys retained nominal authority, but real power was in the hands of the anarchist-dominated committees.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From what you&#039;re inferring, you appear to believe that &#039;anarchy&#039; gives you licence to commit murder -- of myself, in particular -- and that, in the absence of some repressive force such as the police, individuals will naturally go on violent rampages.

This says more about yourself and your own conception of humanity than it does anarchism.

Q. &quot;Could I just do what ever I wanted without any consequence?&quot;

A. Can you now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jim,</p>
<p>On defamation, I asked a retired barrister for his advice.</p>
<p>On anarchy, you are mistaking the absence of rulers for chaos. In other words, confusing the popular misconception for the political philosophy with which I feel the greatest affinity and for which reason I describe myself as being one of its advocates.  My advice is that you begin to familiarise yourself with the history of anarchism as a social movement. One of the pre-eminent examples of the wide-scale implementation of anarchist ideas was that which occurred in <a href="http://question-everything.mahost.org/Archive/chomskyspain.html" rel="nofollow">Spain</a> for a brief period in the 1930s.</p>
<blockquote><p>In Barcelona, industry and commerce were largely collectivized, and a wave of collectivization spread through rural areas, as well as towns and villages, in Aragon, Castile, and the Levante, and to a lesser but still significant extent in many parts of Catalonia, Asturias, Estremadura, and Andalusia. Military power was exercised by defense committees; social and economic organization took many forms, following in main outlines the program of the Saragossa Congress of the anarchist CNT (Confederacion Nacional del Trabajo) in May 1936. The revolution was &#8220;apolitical,&#8221; in the sense that its organs of power and administration remained separate from the central Republican government and, even after several anarchist leaders entered the government in the autumn of 1936, continued to function fairly independently until the revolution was finally crushed between the fascist and Communist-led Republican forces. The success of collectivization of industry and commerce in Barcelona impressed even highly unsympathetic observers such as Franz Borkenau. The scale of rural collectivization is indicated by these data from anarchist sources: in Aragon, 450 collectives with 500,000 members; in the Levante, 900 collectives accounting for about half the agricultural production and 70 percent of marketing in this, the richest agricultural region of Spain; in Castile, 300 collectives with about 100,000 members. In Catalonia, the bourgeois government headed by Luis Companys retained nominal authority, but real power was in the hands of the anarchist-dominated committees.</p></blockquote>
<p>From what you&#8217;re inferring, you appear to believe that &#8216;anarchy&#8217; gives you licence to commit murder &#8212; of myself, in particular &#8212; and that, in the absence of some repressive force such as the police, individuals will naturally go on violent rampages.</p>
<p>This says more about yourself and your own conception of humanity than it does anarchism.</p>
<p>Q. &#8220;Could I just do what ever I wanted without any consequence?&#8221;</p>
<p>A. Can you now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim QLD</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim QLD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188926</guid>
		<description>His pockets are not deep and his legal advice is Darp what a joke. 

Please tell me how long do you think you can survive when your Anarchist Dream of Australia comes to fruition? I give you about 48hrs without Government protection. Others less. Luckily under current Australian law I would never dare think of breaching it.

I pray @ndy you succeed. Imagine total Anarchy no law but the law of man. The Left and the Right would have to sort it our somehow. My god I may just have to try and not enjoy it. I think I now understand the fascination you have for this Anarchist lifestyle. How do I join? If I could prove that I was willing to accept no laws and no regulations will you take me under your wing? It would be handy for me to get closer. Could I just do what ever I wanted without any consequence? Please send me a membership form ASAP. Viva the revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His pockets are not deep and his legal advice is Darp what a joke. </p>
<p>Please tell me how long do you think you can survive when your Anarchist Dream of Australia comes to fruition? I give you about 48hrs without Government protection. Others less. Luckily under current Australian law I would never dare think of breaching it.</p>
<p>I pray @ndy you succeed. Imagine total Anarchy no law but the law of man. The Left and the Right would have to sort it our somehow. My god I may just have to try and not enjoy it. I think I now understand the fascination you have for this Anarchist lifestyle. How do I join? If I could prove that I was willing to accept no laws and no regulations will you take me under your wing? It would be handy for me to get closer. Could I just do what ever I wanted without any consequence? Please send me a membership form ASAP. Viva the revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ndy</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188630</link>
		<dc:creator>@ndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188630</guid>
		<description>Dear Charles,

First, congratulations on winning the Battle of Tours! I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s prompted you to return and to assume the role of legal advisor, but you know best.

On defamation, thanks for the heads up. Unfortunately, I think you have a firmer grasp on the use of heavy cavalry than you do the legal intricacies associated with defamation laws in Australia.

Darrin&#039;s views have evolved somewhat over the last few years. Thus while Mister Hodges may have once been of the opinion that “I’m more interested in the purer form of fascism… and while I don’t subscribe to the whole ‘worship Hitler’ thing, his comments on multiculturalism and politics in general are still just as relevant today as they were 70-odd years ago”, I doubt he would be as clumsy in the present. Further, while he may have opted to replace &#039;The Jew&#039; with &#039;The Muslim&#039; as Public Enemy #1, his commitment to racial politics and a White Australia remains intact.

As for Stormfront, Darrin initially denied his membership of the forum when asked. He then admitted it, declared that he was leaving the forum, returned, and then left again. His membership of Australia First has been terminated (I assume), and he has since joined the Australian Protectionist Party.

By the way, I hope my pockets are REALLLLLLLLLLLLY DEEP too, and I reckon that if I really really really REALLLLLLLLLLLLY wish for it, it&#039;ll come true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Charles,</p>
<p>First, congratulations on winning the Battle of Tours! I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s prompted you to return and to assume the role of legal advisor, but you know best.</p>
<p>On defamation, thanks for the heads up. Unfortunately, I think you have a firmer grasp on the use of heavy cavalry than you do the legal intricacies associated with defamation laws in Australia.</p>
<p>Darrin&#8217;s views have evolved somewhat over the last few years. Thus while Mister Hodges may have once been of the opinion that “I’m more interested in the purer form of fascism… and while I don’t subscribe to the whole ‘worship Hitler’ thing, his comments on multiculturalism and politics in general are still just as relevant today as they were 70-odd years ago”, I doubt he would be as clumsy in the present. Further, while he may have opted to replace &#8216;The Jew&#8217; with &#8216;The Muslim&#8217; as Public Enemy #1, his commitment to racial politics and a White Australia remains intact.</p>
<p>As for Stormfront, Darrin initially denied his membership of the forum when asked. He then admitted it, declared that he was leaving the forum, returned, and then left again. His membership of Australia First has been terminated (I assume), and he has since joined the Australian Protectionist Party.</p>
<p>By the way, I hope my pockets are REALLLLLLLLLLLLY DEEP too, and I reckon that if I really really really REALLLLLLLLLLLLY wish for it, it&#8217;ll come true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Martel</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-188478</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Martel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-188478</guid>
		<description>Re DARRIN HODGES...

Do you realize just how much pain and suffering you could be given through a defamation lawsuit???

I&#039;m serious. Defaming and damaging a person&#039;s reputation can be a VERRRY costly exercise...

Calling Darrin Hodges a &#039;Neo Nazi porn salesman&#039; is about as defamatory as it gets.

He is NOT a &quot;porn salesman&quot; he is an IT consultant who happens to have a number of customers, one of which is an adult website.

YOU HAVE DEFAMED DARRIN...

&quot;NEO NAZI&quot;? He is on record as rejecting such ideas, and distances himself from Stormfront and White pride groups.

So... if he decides to SUE you... I hope your pockets are REALLLLLLLLLLLLY DEEP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re DARRIN HODGES&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you realize just how much pain and suffering you could be given through a defamation lawsuit???</p>
<p>I&#8217;m serious. Defaming and damaging a person&#8217;s reputation can be a VERRRY costly exercise&#8230;</p>
<p>Calling Darrin Hodges a &#8216;Neo Nazi porn salesman&#8217; is about as defamatory as it gets.</p>
<p>He is NOT a &#8220;porn salesman&#8221; he is an IT consultant who happens to have a number of customers, one of which is an adult website.</p>
<p>YOU HAVE DEFAMED DARRIN&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;NEO NAZI&#8221;? He is on record as rejecting such ideas, and distances himself from Stormfront and White pride groups.</p>
<p>So&#8230; if he decides to SUE you&#8230; I hope your pockets are REALLLLLLLLLLLLY DEEP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ndy</title>
		<link>http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386&#038;cpage=1#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>@ndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=386#comment-947</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why is Ben correcting you over the name of a group that wasn’t real, not to mention invented only to make him look stupid?&quot;

Because he not only looks stoopid, he &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; stoopid.

And ill-informed.

But trying to educate Ben about anything is nigh on impossible: one might as well wipe up the sea with a sponge.

“The wise understand by themselves; fools follow the reports of others.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is Ben correcting you over the name of a group that wasn’t real, not to mention invented only to make him look stupid?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because he not only looks stoopid, he <i>is</i> stoopid.</p>
<p>And ill-informed.</p>
<p>But trying to educate Ben about anything is nigh on impossible: one might as well wipe up the sea with a sponge.</p>
<p>“The wise understand by themselves; fools follow the reports of others.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
