The ‘Australia First Party’ may place last on the ballot, but in NSW it’s obviously hoping to replicate Bruce Preece‘s success in Adelaide, and (angrily) sneak onto local council. Thus at the forthcoming Hawkesbury City Council by-election (June 19, 2010), the Party has nominated
former Fields of the Nephilim bass player truckie Tony Pettitt to keep the people of Hawkesbury on the straight and narrow. Battling Tony for control of the wheel on local council are a Green, two Independents and a Tory (Liberal); all four witting — or perhaps unwitting — agents of The Traitor Class, intent on selling Australia out to New World Order liberal-globalist-capitalism.
Actually, AF reckon one of the two Independents is a closet Liberal. Can you guess which one? Is it Nathan Zamprogno (“I am an Christian, Extropian, Monarchist, Triumphalist, patriotic optimist”) or is it Janice Hart?
In the Penrith State by-election (June 19, 2010), AF has nominated another veteran, Mick Saunders, to lose on behalf of White Australia. Mick will be pitting himself against a broader, but equally traitorous, array of opponents: LABOR, GREEN, LIBERAL, OUTDOOR RECREATION, AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRATS, CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY (FRED NILE GROUP), and an INDEPENDENT.
The party recognises that the electorate of Penrith sits about 90% inside the larger boundaries of the Federal electorate of Lindsay where Mick Saunders will certainly be the Australia First Party candidate later this year.
This geographic circumstance allows Australia First to raise the profile of Mick Saunders generally and to advance nationalist themes in this poll. It is widely expected that the Labor Party vote will crash and alternate candidates may feature stronger [sic].
~ Eureka! (Electronic Bulletin of Australia First Party), No.229, May 10, 2010
Of course, the question on every cat lover’s lips is: Will Kitler make a repeat performance?
AF is also planning on standing for Mayor in Griffith, a position currently occupied by Mike Neville.
Mike Neville has been an aggressive opponent of Australia First in the Riverina, repeatedly stating his support for contract labour, multiculturalism and immigration generally. He has supported the globalist notion of permitting imports of fruit and vegetables – which would undermine Riverina’s economy. He has criticised us for years – and offered smear to the press.
We cannot say whether Mr. Neville is guilty of the charges brought against him. That is for a court. Nonetheless, we counselled him thus on our Riverina blogsite: “if you are guilty, take responsibility and plead now – it attracts the sentence discount”.
~ Eureka! (Electronic Bulletin of Australia First Party), No.231, May 23, 2010
AF Fuehrer Dr James Saleam speaks from experience, having been convicted of both fraud and for organising a handful of his moar boneheaded comrades to shoot at the Sydney residence of the African National Congress representative to Australia (see also : Combat 18 / terrormachine clunks into Perth court, June 4, 2010).
I ask the men about Saleam’s criminal history and whether it was an impediment to their electoral success. Both men say they believe he was framed and that the police do it all the time. One moment we are talking about Roger Rogerson shooting Warren Lanfranchi in a Sydney lane and then, the next, Pettitt chimes in to give an example of how easy it is to frame someone like Saleam: “Yeah, look at Saddam Hussein. Mass weapons of destruction. Where are they?”
There is irony that is lost on or unknown to these two men. The building we are sitting in was paid for with the remnants of George Saleam’s estate. Jim Saleam has been able to spend his entire adult life pursuing his racist agenda principally because his grandfather slipped through the White Australia net to become a successful and valued Australian…
~ ‘The Audacity of Hate’, Greg Bearup, Good Weekend, September 26/27, 2009
APP FOWF OMG WTF
While AF worries about (*nudge nudge* *wink wink*) The Money Power and its dread influence over the activities of The Traitor Class — a class always willing to sellout The Nation for the price of a few (*nudge nudge* *wink wink*) shekels — the APP (‘Australian Protectionist Party’ — splitters!) is deeply concerned about The Muslim. Not given to overly-subtle analyses of contemporary Australian politics, the APP’s attitude to immigration (and The Muslim) mirrors that of AF, and may perhaps be best summarised as follows: ‘Fuck Off We’re Full’. ‘Fuck Off We’re Full’ (FOWF) is also a Facebook page, administered by APP NSW leader Darrin Hodges. (Note that the batshit antics of local racists on Facebook are documented on The Antibogan blog.)
FOWF has undergone a number of incarnations during its brief existence, but is probably best known for helping Griffith Community Radio 2MIA employee Terrie-Anne Verney lose her job. The outspoken Verney — whose hostility to Indian immigrants in particular bordered on the genuinely pathological — was even scheduled to address the few score fascists who gathered at the Petersham RSL last September at the annual gathering, known as the Sydney Forum, organised by AF. This year, Forum organisers are planning on bringing the Canadian neo-Nazi and Holocaust denialist Paul Fromm to town. (Last year’s international guest * was the San Francisco-based bizarro Andrew Yeoman, a BANANA. Yeoman was allegedly assaulted by a coupla anarchists in that degenerate town on May Day this year.) Fromm is apparently one of Canada’s more notorious White supremacists, and last year marched alongside the now-defunct (?) neo-Nazi groupuscule the Aryan Guard on White Pride World Wide Day (March 21).
Be that as it may, the latest version of the FOWF page features the following text:
After Sydney not wanting to offend other cultures by putting up Xmas lights…
After hearing that South Australian [sic] changed its opinion and let a Muslim woman have her picture on her driver’s license with her face covered…
Quote written by an [A]ussie citizen and published in an Australian [n]ewspaper:
“Immigrants, not Australians, [m]ust ADAPT. Take it or leave it! I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.
However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the ‘politically correct’ crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia.
However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand.
This idea of Australia being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle.
This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak ENGLISH, not [S]panish, [L]ebanese, [A]rabic, [C]hinese, [J]apanese, [R]ussian or any other language.
Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, LEARN THE LANGUAGE!
If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don’t like ‘A Fair Go’, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.
We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don[‘]t care how you did things where you came from.
This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this.
But once you are done complaining, whining and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our National Motto, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you to advantage of one other great Australian freedom[:]
THE RIGHT TO LEAVE!
If you aren[‘]t happy here then move on! We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So [a]ccept the country YOU accepted.
Pretty easy really, when you think about it.
If we all pass this around or invite your friends to read this sooner or later this will get to the complainers and THEY WILL GET THE POINT![“]
The text which the racist meatheads belonging to FOWF have chosen to adorn their page is both fraudulent and — typically — of foreign origin. Thus, while the bigoted creeps bemoan the presence of all-them-foreigners-what-come-over-here-and-steal-our-jobs-and-our-women, they positively scramble — off like a bride’s nightie — to cram into their tiny pea-brains whatever xenophobic shit their equally moronic Yanqui comrades choose to circulate online: re-confirming — if any further confirmation was required — that They’re bRanes are about as useful as tits on a bull.
snopes.com has the dope:
Claim: Air Force veteran’s editorial outlines the need for immigrants to adapt to American culture.
Status: Partly true.
Example: [Collected via e-mail, October 2002]
HELLO! THIS IS AMERICA!
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma School officials remove “God Bless America” signs from schools in fear that someone might be offended.
Channel 12 News in Long Island, New York, orders flags removed from the newsroom and red, white, and blue ribbons removed from the lapels of reporters. Why? Management did not want to appear biased and felt that our nations flag might give the appearance that “they lean one way or another”
Berkeley, California bans US Flags from being displayed on city fire trucks because they didn’t want to offend anyone in the community.
In an “act of tolerance,” the head of the public library at Florida Gulf Coast University ordered all “Proud to be an American” signs removed so as to not offend international students.
I, for one, am quite disturbed by these actions of so-called American citizens; and I am tired of this nation worrying about whether or not we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on September 11, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled in New York and Washington D.C. when the “politically correct” crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to America. In fact, our country’s population is almost entirely composed of descendants of immigrants; however, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some native Americans, need to understand.
First of all, it is not our responsibility to continually try not to offend you in any way. This idea of America being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle. This culture, called the “American Way” has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom. Our forefathers fought, bled, and died at places such as Bunker Hill, Antietam, San Juan, Iwo Jima, Normandy, Korea, Vietnam, and the Persian Gulf, for our way of life.
We speak English, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society — learn our language!
“In God We Trust” is our national motto. This is not some off-the-wall, Christian, Right Wing, political slogan — it is our national motto. It is engraved in stone in the House of Representatives in our Capitol and it is printed on our currency. We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation; and this is clearly documented throughout our history. If it is appropriate for our motto to be inscribed in the halls of our highest level of Government, then it is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools.
God is in our pledge, our National Anthem, nearly every patriotic song, and in our founding documents. We honor His birth, death, and resurrection as holidays, and we turn to Him in prayer in times of crisis. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture and we are proud to have Him.
We are proud of our heritage and those who have so honorably defended our freedoms. We celebrate Independence Day, Memorial Day, Veterans Day, and Flag Day. We have parades, picnics, and barbecues where we proudly wave our flag. As an American, I have the right to wave my flag, sing my national anthem, quote my national motto, and cite my pledge whenever and wherever I choose. If the Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don’t like Uncle Sam, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.
The American culture is our way of life, our heritage, and we are proud of it. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don’t care how you did things where you came from. We are Americans, like it or not, this is our country, our land, and our lifestyle.
Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion about our government, culture, or society, and we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great American freedom, the right to leave.
If you agree, pass this onto other Americans!!
It is time to take a stand!!
MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA
LAND THAT WE LOVE!!!
Variations: Later versions of this piece omitted the first several paragraphs and included the following preface:
THIS DOES SAY IT ALL!!!
After hearing that the state of Florida changed its opinion and let a Muslim woman have her picture on her drivers license with her face covered, I believe this is even more appropriate. Read on, please!
This is an Editorial written by an American citizen, published in a Tampa Newspaper. He did quite a job; didn’t he?
A January 2008 version combined elements of this article with a separate piece about Muslims in Australia, creating the misleading impression that the hybrid version reflected a speech given by Australian prime minister John Howard:
Prime Minister John Howard – Australia
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.
Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques. Quote: ‘IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.’
‘This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom’
‘We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society .. Learn the language!’
‘Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.’
‘We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.’
‘This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom,
‘THE RIGHT TO LEAVE’.’
‘If you aren’t happy here then LEAVE. We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.’
Origins: The article quoted above was written by Air Force veteran Barry Loudermilk and originally published in his local Georgia newspaper, the Bartow Trader. As Christian Nelson of VietNow National Magazine (which also printed Loudermilk’s piece) wrote of its origins:
After some Internet sleuthing, I caught up with Loudermilk one evening and asked what had brought him to the point of writing the article. “I’ve written a few articles in the past, and I’d been seeing on the news all these organizations wanting to remove patriotic symbols, and talking about ‘offending’ people, and it got me upset. So one night I went home and wrote down what I was thinking. Later, I e-mailed the piece to a few friends, and while I was at it, I sent it to the local newspaper, The Bartow Trader, which had published some of my pieces in the past, and they decided to run it.”
Loudermilk thought that was it. He’d gotten his points across to a few friends, and knew his views were in the local newspaper, and that was enough for him. But it wasn’t over quite yet. About two weeks later, he suddenly started getting hundreds of encouraging e-mails and phone calls from people all around the country saying how much they liked what he had said.
Taking on the items here which can be reasonably categorized as true or false, we come up with the following:
• The ongoing tussle in Broken Arrow and other communities over whether use of the slogan “God Bless America” by government-related agencies should be considered a patriotic message or an unconstitutional display of a religious message is covered on our God Bless America page.
• The issue of television news outlets’ prohibiting their on-air reporters from wearing flags and other patriotic symbols on their clothing is covered on our No Flags Please, We’re American page.
• The (temporary) removal of flags from fire trucks in Berkeley is covered on our Fireban page.
• The constitutionality of “In God We Trust” as a national motto has been contested in court several times, most recently in the case of Gaylor v. United States, which challenged the appearance of “In God We Trust” on coins and currency (and its use as a national motto) as an unconstitutional establishment of religion by the federal government. In 1996, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed that “the statutes establishing ‘In God we trust as our national motto and providing for its reproduction on United States currency do not violate the Establishment Clause.” Other groups continue to maintain that “the phraseology is strictly religious in origin.”
• The claim that the United States of America was “founded by Christian men and women, on Christian principles” has long been a subject of debate, with disclaimants pointing out that although many of the prominent revolutionaries and Founding Fathers were religious, they were Deists or Unitarians and not Christians. Articles such as Was America Founded As a Christian Nation? and The Founding Fathers Were Not Christians use the writings of the same historical figures to establish opposite points of view.
• Although Americans may have a moral right to wave the flag or sing the national anthem whenever they choose, they don’t necessarily always have a legal right to do so. Bellowing out a raucous version of “The Star-Spangled Banner” at 3:00 AM could get you cited for disturbing the peace just the same as a overly-loud rendition of “Louie, Louie” would, and even a display of the American flag can run afoul of local regulations.
• Despite claims to the contrary, the word “God” does appear in our national anthem, albeit not in a part most people know. “The Star-Spangled Banner” is made up of four stanzas (although rarely is any but the first sung), and the final stanza contains the line “And this be our motto: ‘In God is our trust!'”
The preface someone else tacked on to Mr. Loudermilk’s piece was inaccurate at the time it was written, but it later proved to be true when a event similar to the one described occurred…
Not to be outdone by APP, AF also includes its own version of teh stoopid in its latest bulletin (Eureka!, No.232, May 31, 2010). Titled ‘Something To Think About Next Time You Talk To An Elderly Member Of The Family’, Terry Cooksley — on behalf of the NSW State Committee — has authorised the re-publication of another infamous meme regarding the supposedly differential rates of government benefits accruing to AUSTRALIAN AGED PENSIONERs as opposed to the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS/REFUGEES LIVING IN AUSTRALIA. According to AF, Terry, and the Committee, the TOTAL YEARLY BENEFIT received by an AGED PENSIONER is $16,068; an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT/REFUGEE can expect to receive $56,680.
The claim is, unsurprisingly, unsourced, but — like the propaganda utilised by AF’s rivals in the APP — has its origins in the US: and has also been debunked by snopes.com. In Australia, the bullshit has been detected in September 2007, in September 2009, in March 2010 and, most famously perhaps, by Media Watch during the course of its pwning the multi-millionaire talkback squawking hack Alan Jones way back in April, 2008.
Still… refugees eh?