![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.greenisthenewred.com\/blog\/wp-content\/Images\/peyser_vegan_hummus_terrorist_cartoon.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Bah humbug. The chattering classes are at it again: David Burchell in the pages of The Australian<\/em> and James L Gelvin in the pages of the not-quite-as-popular journal Terrorism and Political Violence<\/em> (tho’ I imagine Burchell expresses similar sentiments in his crackademic scribblings). So I’m gonna waste some more of my precious time on my way to an early grave by… er… let’s see.<\/p>\n One. Taking note of the fact that Paul Norton once penned a piece for Larvatus Prodeo asking the question ‘Is David Burchell brain-dead?’<\/a> (October 2, 2007). Burchell on 1968 and all that<\/a> (May 28, 2008) tends to suggest that the answer remains a conditional ‘yes’. (Similarly craptastic ideas of Burchell’s are to be found in Stumbling in harmony with history<\/a>, The Australian<\/em>, December 29, 2008.)<\/p>\n Two. Re-publishing the debate on Gelvin’s thesis that, inre Al-Qaeda<\/a>, ‘it was the anarchists what done it’… Or something.<\/p>\n Being un anarcholoco<\/em> fuelled only by mountains of organic hummus and rivers of organic coffee, scarcely more than an adolescent, lacking all experience of real life, my mind confused by ill-digested philosophical, social, political and economic theories, and perplexed by the drab monotony of my everyday life, I make the empty, arrogant, and pathetic claim to pass definitive judgments, sinking to outright abuse, on my fellow-students, their teachers, God, religion, the clergy, the governments, newspapers, academic journals and political systems of the whole world. Rejecting all morality and restraint, I do not hesitate to commend theft, the destruction of scholarship, the abolition of work, total subversion, and a world-wide proletarian revolution with “unlicensed pleasure” as its only goal.<\/p>\n I also already done published three essays from Terrorism and Political Violence<\/em>, in seemingly random order.<\/p>\n Nineteenth Century Anarchist Terrorism: How Comparable to the Terrorism of al-Qaeda?<\/a> by Richard Bach Jensen<\/a>; Comments on James L. Gelvin\u2019s \u2018\u2018Al-Qaeda and Anarchism: A Historian\u2019s Reply to Terrorology\u2019\u2019<\/a> by George Esenwein<\/a> (author of the neat-o text Anarchist Ideology and the Spanish Working-class Movement, 1868-1898<\/em>, Berkeley, 1989) and Al-Qaeda and Anarchism: A Historian\u2019s Reply to Terrorology: Response to Commentaries<\/a> by James L Gelvin.<\/p>\n Fittingly, I’ve yet to republish Gelvin’s original essay… which fact reminds me.<\/p>\n Three. Publish the other steenky essays.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bah humbug. The chattering classes are at it again: David Burchell in the pages of The Australian and James L Gelvin in the pages of the not-quite-as-popular journal Terrorism and Political Violence (tho’ I imagine Burchell expresses similar sentiments in … Continue reading