{"id":29362,"date":"2012-03-06T21:08:32","date_gmt":"2012-03-06T11:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/slackbastard.anarchobase.com\/?p=29362"},"modified":"2012-03-06T21:08:32","modified_gmt":"2012-03-06T11:08:32","slug":"15000-hits-per-annum-fck","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/slackbastard.anarchobase.com\/?p=29362","title":{"rendered":"15,000 hits per annum? F*ck."},"content":{"rendered":"

Huh<\/a>.<\/p>\n

News Media Council eh?<\/p>\n

The second change arises from the fact that there are many newsletter publishers and bloggers, although no longer part of the \u2018lonely pamphleteer\u2019 tradition, who offer up-to-date reflections on current affairs. Quite a number have a very small audience. There are practical reasons for excluding from the definition of \u2018news media\u2019 publishers who do not have a sufficiently large audience. If a publisher distributes more than 3000 copies of print per issue or a news internet site has a minimum of 15 000 hits per annum it should be subject to the jurisdiction of the News Media Council, but not otherwise. These numbers are arbitrary, but a line must be drawn somewhere.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I wonder how the Council will measure hits from the blog? In any case, 15,000 hits<\/em> per annum is bugger-all: I get that many page views<\/em> in a week (or two).<\/p>\n

Moar later.<\/p>\n

In the meantime…<\/p>\n