So…

So, since it was thought that government was necessary and that without government there could only be disorder and confusion, it was natural and logical that anarchy, which means absence of government, should sound like absence of order.

Nor is the phenomenon without parallel in the history of words. In times and in countries where the people believed in the need for government by one man (monarchy), the word republic, which is government by many, was in fact used in the sense of disorder and confusion—and this meaning is still to be found in the popular language of almost all countries.

Change opinion, convince the public that government is not only unnecessary, but extremely harmful, and then the word anarchy, just because it means absence of government, will come to mean for everybody: natural order, unity of human needs and the interests of all, complete freedom within complete solidarity.

Those who say therefore that the anarchists have badly chosen their name because it is wrongly interpreted by the masses and lends itself to wrong interpretations, are mistaken. The error does not come from the word but from the thing; and the difficulties anarchists face in their propaganda do not depend on the name they have taken, but on the fact that their concept clashes with all the public’s long established prejudices on the function of government, or the State as it is also called.

~ Errico Malatesta, Anarchy (1891)

About @ndy

I live in Melbourne, Australia. I like anarchy. I don't like nazis. I enjoy eating pizza and drinking beer. I barrack for the greatest football team on Earth: Collingwood Magpies. The 2024 premiership's a cakewalk for the good old Collingwood.
This entry was posted in Anarchism, History. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to So…

  1. (A)dam says:

    Never heard of that bloke before and never heard that problem stated so well bravo sir.

  2. @ndy says:

    Malatesta was quite a character, a real troublemaker, and a very lucid (and quite prolific) writer. He had some very interesting polemics with both Kropotkin re WWI and Makhno re ‘The Platform’ in particular, but is probably most famous for being an organiser and populariser of anarchism in his native Italy and abroad.

    Speaking of war, a document (poster) produced by French anarchists in 1943:

    Proletarians!

    From East to West, from South to North, throughout the world, for three years, to a greater or lesser extent, you have been paying the price of the battle unleashed by your masters. Thousands of proletarians of all countries are dying, while men of finance, politics and war, brutes that they are, congratulate each other, giving speeches, sharing out the benefits, and dividing the wealth and privileges among them selves.

    Remember, you veterans of the “war to end all wars,” when you came home in 1918, still blood-stained from that infamous butchery which left ten million dead, twenty million injured, ten million permanently disabled, three million missing and millions of widows and orphans–then you said, and promised, NEVER AGAIN! Now, again, the military beasts have got their hands on you. All over the world, men are no longer men, they are serial numbers.

    How long will this last? Until the proletarians of the whole world understand that they have only one enemy: their bosses. Until the proletarians of the whole world fraternize, unite and finally charge forward, armed with bayonets still wet with their brothers’ blood, to stab in the ass all the governing and war- mongering charlatans.

    Proletarians: In 1919 and in 1936 you shouted, “Death to The Brutes!” Now, in 1943, don’t shout, ACT. Death to ALL of them, whether they wear the swastika, the red star, the Order of the Garter, the Lorraine Cross or the Francisque.

    LONG LIVE LIBERTY!

    LONG LIVE PEACE!

    LONG LIVE THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION!

  3. @ndy says:

    Mad props to Louis Lingg too.

  4. There were some really great Italian anarchists, weren’t there?

    Read a really great book (in 2000) called Social Anarchism.

    (This is instrumental and informative.)

    Giovanni Baldelli [1971]’s Social Anarchism

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.