- It’s all over, apparently: “After almost six weeks locked out without pay, 140 cold storage workers at Swift Australia in Brooklyn have reached agreement with their employer.” [SBS] In the intervening period, the company successfully attracted a fine of $50,000 for dumping excess waste into a local creek. Also : Australia: National Union of Workers sells out six-week Swift meatworkers’ struggle, Margaret Rees and Frank Gaglioti, wsws.org, January 13, 2011.
A strike @ Visy in Dandenong ended last month; another @ Swift in Brooklyn [map] is ongoing and now into its fifth week. The factory is located on Industry Park Drive:
Brooklyn Processing Plant
30 Industry Park Drive
BROOKLYN VIC 3012
PO Box 36
ALTONA NORTH VIC 3025
Phone: 03 9315 1299
Facsimile: 03 9314 1011
Swift Australia is a subsidiary of the Brazilian-based TNC JBS Friboi, the largest beef producer in the world. Swift has been busy taking advantage of the 457 visa scheme elsewhere in the country, and raking in even fatter profits as a result. The strike/lockout was triggered by workers’ refusal to to agree to a measly 2% pay increase “in exchange for working Saturdays with reduced penalties” (Brooklyn meatworkers in wage war, Maribyrnong Weekly, December 8, 2010).
The Workers Solidarity Network (Melbourne) provides the following infos:
Community assembly underway at Swift Australia
Striking cold store workers at Swift Australia voted against the latest in a string of condescending offers from management today, as Workers Solidarity Network members and union activists assembled at the site.
The workers’ supporters blocked trucks throughout the day, sending a message to the company that endless stalling and bad-faith negotiation must end.
Confident despite their five-week ordeal, the workers reminded those attempting to cross the picket that Swift cannot be allowed to set this precedent for the mistreatment of workers, and that ‘touch one, touch all’ applies now more than ever.
ACTU President Ged Kearney was present, promising to do all she could to get more union supporters down to the site and funds raised. The Western Suburbs Community and Union Coalition, as well as ANF, MUA, ASU, NTEU, CFMEU and CEPU members all came to show their support for the striking workers, even helping to block trucks. All promised to return tomorrow with extra support.
Some workers, while appreciative, questioned why this community support was so long coming. Indeed because the call for community help has come so late in the dispute, it is crucial that all supporters go now and stand on the picket line alongside their friends in Brooklyn.
Things are pretty tight at Swift Australia/JBS Friboi. On the one hand, the company has apparently failed in a takeover bid of Australian food giant Sara Lee:
On the other hand, the company is having enormous difficulty paying a fraction of its workers in Brooklyn just a little bit more than the minimum wage.
Meat supplier locks out workers
Ben Schneiders
The Age
December 23, 2010
Perhaps the WSWS article is as good a place as any to start a discussion of what the WSN is. I would be interested to know what the WSN has to say about WSWS crew being asked to leave a picket for handing out a leaflet, if indeed they were even aware of it. I think the WSWS’ characterisation of the community picket is pretty accurate. As with it’s predecessor, Union Solidarity, the community picket seems to increasingly function as an excuse for unions themselves not to mobilise members. The fear of the secondary boycott provisions, as the justification for Union Solidarity’s existence is I think just accepted within the WSN. But should we accept that we should find ways of working within these laws? If we accept the secondary boycott provisions as here to stay, then it seems there really is no horizon for action beyond the increasingly pathetic demands of unions on management. The community picket functions to cover up what the secondary boycott provisions, and union refusal to confront them means. The community picket offers the small consolation prize of committed unionists from other areas using their bodies to engage in minimal symbolic disruption for long enough for the union to negotiate with the company and both union and WSN to declare a victory when negotiation works: when it becomes clear that no one else is coming, that no effective actions by other workers at other plants are coming, that nothing will spread beyond their work site – well of course they agree to the only deal the union offers, which is usually well less than the rhetoric of those organising the community picket, who anyway, get the version of events fed to them by the union, that perpetuates both their ongoing roles.
I would like to hear that I’m wrong however, and that the WSWS reporting of this dispute is inaccurate. But you can tell I’m not surprised since it rings so true.
More on the WSWS being accosted, apparently by workers, at the WSN facebook page…
Yeah. WSWS reckon it was “NUW bureaucrats” wot done it, and the angry workers who told them to piss orf were incited by the same “bureaucrats”. The article makes various other criticisms of the union’s conduct: that the workers were “deliberately isolated by their union for nearly six weeks”; that it “rammed through” an agreement under dubious circumstances, and that this agreement “accepts a number of the company’s key demands”. And so on and so forth.
Buggered if I know.
On the rest, moar later.
The deliberate isolation for weeks: check. Accepting company demands, including pay ‘rises’ which, after inflation, are pay cuts: check. Accepting new divisions within the workforce: seems like it. As to the specific dynamics which determined the struggle and its limits: well, maybe others can explain.