Voluntary Student Unionism (VSU)

As discussed previously, the Australian student movement (such as it is) and the Australian student left (in particular) is facing a crisis, one created by the Federal Government’s passing of Voluntary Student Unionism (VSU) legislation (sometimes also unflatteringly referred to as Anti-Student Organisation Legislation (ASOL)).

As a result, there’s been the usual flurry of emails and position papers, boldly declaring that, despite its passage through the Senate last December, “¡la lucha continúa!”. (A perspective bolstered, perhaps, by the expectation of a militant response by industrial labour to Howard’s new industrial regime: a transparent attempt to smash trade unions, drive down wages, and increase profits). “VSU won’t silence students” NUS President Rose Jackson declared in a press release supporting student participation in anti-war rallies (March 14, 2006). Which is obvious. Less obvious is the manner in which students might take action to either prevent the successful implementation of VSU, or, if not, maintain a viable movement in the absence of a student bureaucracy.

As for the first course of action, this is a “simple” matter of adopting the enemy’s mentality and applying a cost benefit analysis to the proposed law. Thus if the costs, measured in both economic and political terms, exceed the benefits, then the Federal Government — and possibly even the next ALP Government, when that finally arrives (most likely minus ‘Bomber’ Beazley) — may well rescind or amend the law to return it to something like its original state. In this respect, French youth have provided Australian students with an excellent model.

University Students: Budding Revolutionaries, Middle Class Twats… or Both?

The AVCC provides the following statistics in relation to the higher education sector:

There are currently 37 public and 3 private universities in Australia. In 2003, there were over 650,000 full-time students (of whom a little less than 30,000 were fee-paying), and over 900,000 continuing and commencing students. 78% of university students elect to defer their HECS/HELP fees (more accurately described as ‘the Dawkins tax’ after John Dawkins; wealthy bourgeois, ex-student radical and from 1987 to 1991 the Minister for Employment, Education and Training: the person responsible for the re-introduction of university fees). Just less than 14% of students are deemed to be of ‘low socio-economic status’ (a category left undefined).

But what does it all mean? Stay tuned!

Posted in State / Politics, Student movement | Leave a comment

a message from the iron sheik

“I am disgusted that a white supremacist website (sponsored by Ben Weerheym) based in Australia profiled my picture and linked to my website. I refuse to be used for such nefarious purposes as white, Christian chauvinism, which is the enemy of the message I spread. I also unambiguously reject their anti-Jewish agenda, as well as their clear antagonism to people of color. To think that Palestinians fighting for their liberation have common cause with them shows their own desperation and irrelevence. Such fringe groups, we have to remember, are just as anti-Arab as they are anti- any other group. Though they are fringe, as the beatings near Sydney last year show, anti-Arab racism is far too prevalent to take such hate groups lightly.

I applaud those opposing fascist, ultra-nationalist groups — whether in the form of Australian hate groups, South American cartels, Arab dictators, American Neo-Cons, or Israeli leadership. Keep up the good work.”

Iron Sheik, 3/27/06

Note: “Using hip-hop as his medium, the Iron Sheik relays informed views on the Palestinian movement for independence, the war on terrorism, US foreign policy in general, the Arab world, and growing up Arab-American. Since releasing his first [brilliantly-titled] album, Camel Clutch (2003), he has toured nationally, and performed internationally.”

And he’s not the only one.

“Across the Gaza Strip, West Bank and even in Israel, young Arabic rappers are trying to juggle Middle East traditions with contemporary Western culture to create a political voice for their generation…”

Oh, and here’s a picture of one of my two all-time favourite professional wrestlers: the (other) Iron Sheik! The Iron Sheik’s favoured message? “USA hack-ptooey!”

Posted in Anti-fascism, Music | Leave a comment

More weasel words from Weerheym (II)

As discussed previously, Perth neo-Nazi, synagogue and war widows’ retirement village vandal Ben Weerheym has reacted badly to his public exposure in a recent article in The West Australian. In fact, on Weerheym’s blog, he notes that he was “personally offended” by it.

Weerheym’s reaction is not surprising. His former leader, Jack van Tongeren, of the neo-Nazi Australian Nationalist(s) Movement, is currently on the run from the law. Further, local (WA) police have questioned Weerheym several times in relation to van Tongeren’s disappearance (and that of his accomplice, Matthew Billing). And finally, political pressure appears to be building in WA for charges to be brought against Weerheym under Australian laws relating to Racial Vilification and Holocaust Denial.*

Ah, the joys of being a net-Nazi!

In response to these developments — and after a week’s silence — Weerheym has posted three ‘press releases’. The first of these is a reply to Fran Spencer, author of the exposé (discussed previously). The other two, discussed below, attempt to i) provide a rationale for Weerheym’s imaginary alliance of local fascists (the ‘Patriot Alliance Down-under’) and ii) ‘unveil’ the trans-Tasman anti-racist network Fightdemback as being an illegitimate, if not criminal, organisation.

1) (The) Patriot Alliance Down-under (PAD)

According to Weerheym, the PAD consists of ‘patriotic’ Australians and New Zealanders. Their online postings are intended to correct the bias of the Jewish-controlled media and the leftists who write for it. Furthermore, the PAD is opposed to the use of violence and illegal activity (“[i]n no way do I or other contributors of the PAD undertake, promote or condone illegal activity or violence of any sort”), and is committed to free speech, democracy and helping little old ladies cross the road. (OK, so I made that last bit up… but you get the picture.)

Weerheym’s main contention, however, is that the PAD does not consist of “white supremacists”, “neo-Nazis”, “bigots” or any other fictional ‘buzz’ label. Further, that its political rationale is legitimate, especially “[c]onsidering that we of European lineage represent [less] than 10% of the global population”. And in its almighty wisdom, the PAD “understands” that Jews and their leftist allies “have been and are destructive to the culture, identity and longevity [of] we Indo-Europeans the world over”.

So much for Weerheym. In my opinion, not only is Weerheym a neo-Nazi, he’s also a liar and a fraud. Please let me elaborate on why I feel this.

First, let’s refresh our memories, shall we?

I WILL seriously assault you, I don’t care if I go to jail dickhead, I will stomp on your fucking head, I couldn’t care who reads this, you are a filthy peice [sic] of shit that deserves to be badly assaulted… It may not happen straight away but I will store it in my brain [sic] for another time. You think I am an evil [N]azi? I will go out of my way for you to defin[i]tely think so.

That was last year. This week, Weerheym wouldn’t hurt a fly. So for all his jumping up and down about the evils of transgenderism, I reckon Weerheym’s basic problem is that he doesn’t know if he’s Arthur or Martha. To put it another way: he’s a sandwich short of a picnic, three bricks short of a load and if brains were gunpowder he couldn’t blow his own nose.

In short, Ben Weerheym is your typical White supremacist / neo-Nazi / bigot.

Secondly, let’s see who else comprises Weerheym’s “alliance”. First off the boat is Douglas Norris [?] of the New Zealand Dominion Post (March 23, 2006); next comes Darrin Hodges (March 13, 2006 and elsewhere); John Pell, Dr. James Saleam and Val Hale (February 28, 2006) moan about there being too many blacks in Toowoomba; while the (US-based) neo-Nazi National Vanguard, National Alliance** (February 23, and February 22, 2006 respectively, as well as numerous other posts) and the Dresden Remembrance Committee (February 15, 2006: for more on the bombing of Dresden, and the far right’s attempts to hijack the event, read here, here and here) are all neo-Nazi organisations.

In other words, the PAD is, basically, Ben Weerheym. So too, Weerheym’s other blog, ‘Leftywatch’. In fact, prior to 2006, Weerheym doesn’t even bother to pretend otherwise. I suppose that the only remaining point I think is worth emphasising is the fact that ‘PAD’ (Weerheym’s blog) has in fact undergone quite a number of name changes and re-configurations: partly in response to pressure from the outside, and partly due to Weerheym’s own mental instability.

::::::

* For further discussion of the evolution of such laws in Australia, see Danny Yee’s review of Luke McNamara’s Regulating Racism: Racial Vilification Laws in Australia. Interestingly, Yee notes that “The West Australian legislation came in response to a racist campaign by the Australian Nationalist Movement. It is unique in criminalising racial vilification generally, not just a narrower “aggravated” category. There have as yet been no cases — and comparison with a similar Canadian law suggests the barrier to criminal prosecution is too high”. For Yee’s take on more general issues to do with ‘Internet censorship’, click here.

** “National Alliance (NA) tore itself to shreds in the months after the first [2002] York rally. That year its founder William Pierce died, starting the downfall. Billy Roper, quite possibly its most visible member, got the boot. He then started another group White Revolution, which in the past three years has lost two members to [my homies in the] OPP! Meanwhile, NA suffered a mutiny in 2005, and is pretty much irrelevant. Those that broke away from the NA are calling themselves National Vanguard, and are not doing any better. Their most recent routine: promoting on their website a pro-Palestinian hip-hop concert put on by people who hate racism whether it is in the form of Zionism or Nazism.”

2) Fightdemback! (FDB)

Fascists on di attack?
Don’t worry ’bout dat.
Fascists on di attack?
We will fight dem back!

Weerheym makes a number of claims regarding FDB in his ‘press release’, and even more on his blogs, each one more bizarre than the previous. Thus according to Weerheym, FDB has, among other things, employed private detectives to spy on racists and fascists, engaged in blackmail, and ‘covertly’ compiles dossiers on and periodically issues threats of violence to the racists and fascists whose activities it monitors. Worst, its members “often joke about paedophilia, homosexual rape, and anal sex online”!

Weerheym also maintains (December 18, 2005) that FDB is financed by… the Jews! (To be precise: the Anti-Defamation Commission of B’nai B’rith.) In this context, it’s worth noting that Weerheym has gone to some effort to conceal his fear, hatred and contempt for Jews. For example, while the ‘Disclaimer’ that accompanies the latest version of ‘Leftywatch’ states If you are offended by the truth and information that can be politically incorrect then turn away now and bury your head in the sand. Click this link for a more appropriate site in its previous incarnation it reads If you are offended by the truth and information that can be politically correct then turn away now and bury your head in the sand. Click this link for a more appropriate site. Click the links and you’ll see why.

Briefly, then: the evidence Weerheym produces to support his fanciful conjectures is practically non-existent. The ‘private detective’ in question, for example, is one “Tim Heggarty”. On his Leftywatch blog, Weerheym promises to provide three ‘case studies’ regarding the nefarious activities of “Tim”. The first ‘case’ is a rather confused account of a correspondence between Weerheym and some other bloke. The second and third remain undisclosed as of January 16, 2006. As far as FDB is concerned, as Mat put it: FDB has “no fucking idea about what you are talking about”.

The accusation of ‘blackmail’ Weerheym levels at FDB appears to be somehow related to the exposure of the activities of some neo-Nazi teenagers. The fact that the neo-Nazi teenagers in question have yet to sue for “blackmail” could be read as implying that Weerheym is, as usual, talking absolute bollocks.

Finally, as regards ‘secret dossiers’… well, you’re reading my “secrets”. In fact, while Weerheym is obviously too stupid to realise it, the information FDB compiles is largely the result of the assiduous application of basic research skills by a collective of anti-racists. In compiling this information, FDB’s efforts are augmented by the involvement of a number of people with professional, semi-professional and even amateur IT expertise.

Simple, really.

But quite successful, don’t you think?

Posted in Anti-fascism, Media | Leave a comment

Weasel words from Weerheym (I)

After a regrettably short absence, Ben Weerheym is back. Again. With another list of lies, half-truths and excuses aimed at whitewashing his recent and extensive history of public bigotry, ignorance and stupidity; a history which now threatens to land him, again, rightly or wrongly, in court.

Please let me elaborate on why I feel this.

Claimed by Weerheym to be ‘press releases’ — although I somehow doubt that they’ll be picked up by AAP — Weerheym’s last three posts address three separate issues. First, the ‘Patriot Alliance Down Under’. Secondly, Fightdemback. And finally, Weerheym is a little worried about a recent article by Fran Spencer in The West Australian: ‘Racist Perth web site under investigation’.

Weerheym on Spencer on Weerheym

Weerheym claims to have been “personally offended” (sob) by Fran Spencer’s article, and denies that:

i) he is a “white supremacist” (as Spencer’s article correctly labels him);
ii) his blog, avoiceofdissent, “openly threatens individuals”;
iii) his criminal record is as extensive or significant as Spencer claims and;
iv) ‘”posts on the Patriot Alliance Down-under blog have included references to “oily dune coons”, “sandniggers” and “the Asian invasion”‘.

Now to Weerheym’s lies, half-truths and excuses:

i) A poor command of the English language (a typical and especially amusing attribute of ‘White supremacists’), in conjunction with various forms of cognitive dissonance previously unknown to science, makes reading Weerheym hard work.

Wearing his Mad (pseudo-) Scientist hat, Dr. Weerheym opines that “because of recent advancements in scientific fields such as genetics, biology and paleo-anthropology, I understand that race is not a social or political construct and that race does represent différance“.

Unfortunately, Dr. Weerheym presents no evidence to justify his thesis. Further, it hardly explains his periodic outbursts of murderous rage at Jews, blacks, gays, anarchists, Marxists, leftists and ‘multiculturalists’. Nor does it provide a rational justification for Weerheym’s espousal of white supremacy or fascism. Perhaps the only thing it does provide is an opportunity for Weerheym to identify himself as a ‘victim’:

I beleive [sic] that all races and their assorted ethnicities [sic] have a right to life and deserve self determination. Upon realization that the specific race that I belong to represents fewer than 10% of the global population, I decided to pay more attention to the promotion of those of European lineage. I mean no harm to any person out there but because of these beleifs [sic], I have been vilified, victimized, smeared and pretty much demonized. I still don’t know why this is so.

Thus confirming one of two things: 1) Weerheym is grossly stupid; 2) Weerheym is dishonest.

ii) “Never has any author featured on the PAD website or sister site ‘Leftywatch’ ever threatened any individual that may have been featured on either website.”

A straight-out, and easily demonstrable, lie. In reality, Weerheym and his fascist comrades have issued numerous threats of violence towards anti-racists, including but not limited to those individuals that appear on his blog(s). Here’s a sample of Weerheym’s own rather pathetic attempts at intimidating his opposition:

Exhibit A, in which Weerheym bravely compares himself to a (neo-)Nazi terrorist… (I wonder who he could have had in mind):

“If I’m supposedly a “[N]azi terrorist” wouldn’t it be wise to shut your mouth? I mean don’t “[N]azi terrorists” fire bomb the shit out of houses and bash the shit out of the families of people like you?”

B, in which Weerheym reveals his hatred of small people:

“[Y]ou cut that shit the fuck out bitch, [P]erth is a small place, who knows who the fuck you may bump into, groups of wankers like you are even smaller.”

C, in which Weerheym reveals that, in his opinion, Duck Monster is a rather successful antifa:

“DUCK MONSTER = DEAD BITCH WALKING!”

D, in which Weerheym declares his infatuation with Mathew Henderson-Hau (‘Darp’):

“I would watch my step [D]arpy, there are alot [sic] more [sic] bigger and badder people out there than me and you are doing a good job of pissing them off.

[T]he way you parade yourself around on the internet and in real life as if you are the almighty saviour against the evil evil [sic] non-left thinkers makes you a target and the more you do it, the more negative repercussions there could be.”

E, in which Weerheym continues to engage in masturbatory fantasies of revenge against Henderson-Hau, this time for daring to regard Claire Forlani as attractive:

“Darp, how dare you even dare [sic] to think about Claire Forlani in a sexual nature [sic]. She is a great example of true [A]ryan beauty and something that mongrel Maori Jews should never infect with their disgusting mis[c]egenation. If you are so proud of who you are, go for your own type and keep the hell away from our beautiful women. [Y]ou polluted mongrel pig.”

F, in which Weerheym conveys his incomprehension at the meaning of the expression ‘Every dog has its day’. And how much he hates Jews:

“[D]arp, you really are a mentally defective mongrel. Remember, every dog has it’s [sic] day and you ol’ buddy, are just that DOG. Good idea to keep your head down on Hitler[‘]s birthday, actually, probably a good idea to keep it down permanently. The right is getting ever stronger and there is NOTHING you can do to stop it, except for ranting like the neurotic little school kid you are. RAUS JUDEN!”

G, in which Weerheym champions the use of gas chambers against his opposition:

“I am not a National Front member but they have my support! [I]nto the shower block with you!”

H, in which Weerheym settles on lynching as an appropriate response to criticism of his fascist politics:

“[A]hhhh the need for a shot gun, guess some rope and a tree will do the trick.”

I, in which Weerheym reveals that he has a rather disturbing sense of humour; one which regards the deaths of millions of African men, women and children from the AIDS pandemic as being worthy of celebration:

“[L]isten here you fuckin[‘] ugly rock ape. I meant if you were born in NZ or born in a slum somewhere in Africa where your relatives still are – where you should still be. Go back to Africa and die of AIDS, just like the rest of you are! [H]ahahaha.”

J:

“Keep on moaning about white skinheads as you hide behind you[r] computer screen, you puny little ugly gooks get the shit stomped out of you – and that[‘]s just for fun!”

K:

“[S]hut the fuck up nigger, you have no right to speak. Get back outside and clean out the chook house before [you] get lynched boy!

[…followed by a picture of two black men being lynched…]

[S]ay hello to your relatives tar boy!”

L, (in reference to Nic Miller of the (New Zealand) National Front allegedly assaulting some Somali youths):

“I want to shake the hands of the guys that did this! Whether or not they ARE NF members or have just bought a shirt is another story, NF members do not go out of their way for trouble against niggers like this while wearing NF shirts. Perhaps next time the victims will be you faggot loving wannabes.”

M:

“DIE LEFTY PUNK SCUM!

TO THE OVENS WITH YOU!”

I rest my case.

iii) Rather stupidly, Weerheym attempts to downplay his involvement in a series of racist grafitti attacks against a Chinese restaurant, a (Jewish) synagogue, and a (Jewish) kosher food store in Perth in July 2004: “Not at any stage was I responsible for any… vandalism… Under duress, I was responsible for driving one of the vehicles at the time of these events…”

The facts: on trial in August 2004, Weerheym plead guilty to 9 counts of wilfully and unlawfully damaging property, one of five men — members of the neo-Nazi ‘White Devils’ gang — to be convicted and sentenced by the courts in relation to the same string of offences. However, while the other four Übermensch received custodial sentences, Weerheym received a sentence of six months and one day (suspended for 12 months) on the grounds that he was ‘only’ the getaway driver.

Significantly, Weerheym lied to the court about his previous membership and promotion of the Australian Nationalist(s) Movement, a neo-Nazi terrorist organisation which Weerhym once described as “the most effective, organised, active and above all premier nationalist/pro-white organisation in Australia”: “Weerheym’s lawyer, Michael Tudori, told the Perth Magistrates Court Weerheym was not interested in the ANM and had not wanted to take part in the graffiti”.

The funny thing is, Weerheym has already publically admitted to the deception. In an email on the fascist Austnewnation forum on November 11, 2004, he wrote: “Basically I said those things in court to keep me out of jail and it worked…”. He even provides clarification in relation to his issuing of an insincere ‘apology’: “The only people I did say sorry to is the old ladies in the war widows[‘] retirement village… I never apologized to the Jews or the pro-multicult cronies”.

Ben Weerheym versus elderly, retired war widows:

Weerhym: 1
Little Old Ladies: 0

Lang lebend der arisch Superman!

iv) According to Weerheym, the only possible explanation for the appearance of the terms “oily dune coons”, “sand niggers” and “Asian invasion” or any other racial slurs on his blog is because he maintained an open slather policy on his comments. Weerheym, on the other hand, would never dare to use such expressions.

He just does.

Frequently.

[Second and final part to follow…]

Posted in Anti-fascism, Media | Leave a comment

V For Vendetta // A For Anarchy

[Oh yeah. The Prime Minister, John Howard, has finally come clean and delivered a disarmingly honest apology for his atrocious war-mongering — to a rather stunned audience. Read the transcript here.]


a for anarchy

Posted in Anarchism, Anti-fascism, Film, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Jack, He’s Here to Help

‘Drop bomb counts or I stay on the run: racist’
The West Australian
Sean Cowan and Luke MorfesseWA’s most wanted man, racist Jack van Tongeren, has finally broken his silence by vowing to remain a fugitive from justice unless police drop three charges against him of plotting to bomb Chinese restaurants.

Despite having been on the run since mid-February, the racist leader sent The West Australian a handwritten statement, dated March 8, in which he claimed he feared police would kill him.

Mr van Tongeren, a Vietnam War veteran whose father was Eurasian said the entire case against him was fabricated in an attempt to keep him from winning a seat in Federal Parliament.

Now, on the run from justice, he could not lead his “Aussie people” into a better age.

“Make no mistake, my comrades and I now face possible death at the hands of Stalinist-like armed TRG and their ilk or, at the best, spend the rest of our lives in State-run Gulags,” he said.

Mr van Tongeren made a mockery of the justice system [?!?] and sparked a nationwide police alert when he absconded with co-accused Matthew Peter Billing just weeks after a judge ordered he be released from Hakea Prison on bail.

In his statement, he said the pair had followed their bail conditions but were set up by a prosecution witness who approached them at a court hearing.

Under their bail conditions the pair could not talk to the witness and, as a result, police planned to rearrest them, he said.

“Drop all charges against my comrades and I that were levelled against us just before the 2004CE Federal election,” the statement said.

“Only then will we present ourselves publicly to the WA people, safe from threats of death or jailing by the WA police, and then lead our Aussie people into a far better, freer age.”

Det-Sgt Dario Bolzonella, of the State security investigation group, said police were almost certain the letter was written by Mr van Tongeren.

“It’s in a similar style to his previous writing but obviously that needs to be authenticated,” he said.

“It’s being treated forensically and also being analysed . . . to see if it is consistent with something that Mr van Tongeren would have written.”

Sgt Bolzonella said the charges against the two men would not be dropped.

He also said Mr van Tongeren’s claim that he and Mr Billing had been set up to breach their bail conditions after a contrived confrontation at the Central Law Courts was wrong.

“Mr van Tongeren is not wanted for (anything) stemming out of the incident at the Central Law Courts,” he said. “What he is wanted for is breaching his bail (by not meeting daily reporting conditions).”

Investigators also believe the different dates on the letter, March 8, and postmark, March 22, indicate that the fugitives are being helped by family or friends.

Posted in Anti-fascism | Leave a comment

mum reckons they were set up

While authorities chase the families of ‘missing’ white supremacists Matthew Billing and Jack van Tongeren for $40,000 in forfeited bail, Billing’s mother has stated that she’s relieved at learning of the existence of a letter, purportedly written by the missing men on ANM letterhead and dated March 8, and sent to the media:

“I was relieved that we had heard from them because, up until then, we were really quite frightened that something serious had happened to them, so it was good to hear that at least they’re still alive… I haven’t read totally the contents [of the letter] but I agree with what Jack is saying, they were set up.”

[Billing and van Tongeren] were due to go on trial with a third co-accused, John van Blitterswyk, for allegedly plotting to firebomb four Chinese restaurants in 2004.All three men have pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Mr Van Blitterswyk appeared for the scheduled court appearance on Monday but the trial was adjourned until a status conference on June 20 to give prosecutors time to decide how they will proceed.

Mr Van Tongeren’s failure to appear in court leaves his elderly mother facing a $30,000 bail forfeiture.

Mr Billing’s father will have to pay $10,000.

Posted in Anti-fascism | Leave a comment

more loose ends

anarchist people of color have a site. it’s not illegal. (yet.)

There is no original or primary Bitch that Bitch imitates, but Bitch is a kind of imitation for which there is no original.

b o r d e r l a n d s e-journal’s latest issue is dedicated to examining the work of a French bloke what strangled his wife.

Rowan Cahill has written an interesting rejoinder to corporate flak Gerard Henderson on the subject of ‘Australian Fascism’: “The [New] Guard was a well-financed, well-armed, organization, the creation of an elite of Australia’s wealthy, powerful, socially exclusive men.” (Unlike say, this mob.)

‘Teach Me if You Can: An Interview with David Graeber’. “David Graeber is a professor of anthropology at Yale University. After becoming an activist for the anarchist cause, Graeber received disdain from a few colleagues and was soon informed that his teaching contract would not be renewed. On November 2nd, 2005, Steven Durel had lunch with Graeber at Yale.” Isn’t that nice? (See, anarchists can be civil.)

Alain Gresh reckons that “Hamas’ landslide win at the Palestinian elections on 25 January has been greeted with indignant warnings and commentaries from the United States and the European Union, including France. We need to put this event in context.”

John Holloway wants to change the world without taking power (and by making only two passing references to anarchism in his book on the same subject… sigh).

George Katsiaficas has some interesting things to say. (I reckon.)

Tasneem Khalil is “a journalist from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Endorses and advocates Libertarian Socialism and Free/Open Software & Publication”.

Ken McLeod is weird. According to some, he’s a Trotskyist libertarian cyberpunk. He hatesss filthy anarchistsss. He has a blog.

proletariawhat?

Stay Human is an album by Michael Franti & Spearhead. (Quite a good one too.) It’s also the name of “a melbourne based business, that produces a range of ethically made merchandise, like badges, keyrings, stickers, candy and screen printed garments for bands and other groups. Our main aim is to make getting non-sweatshop merchandise as easy as possible, thus encouraging more people to do it”.

As for Jeff Vail… best let him speak for himself:

What to say? My name is Jeff Vail. Born & raised in California, I was fortunate enough to have been dragged (happily) all over the world by my parents. I attended the US Air Force Academy in Colorado, graduating in 1999. I keep hearing about people being “radicalized” in madrasas, or religious schools, in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Well, I have USAFA to thank for that…in a manner of speaking. After graduation I went to Intelligence Officer school. As an Intelligence Officer I did a number of things: Targeted bombs and cruise missiles for the American invasion of Afghanistan with the 36th Intelligence Squadron, was Chief of Intelligence with the 41st Electronic Combat Squadron (EC-130H COMPASS CALL, for those who care), and also Chief of Intelligence for the 41st Expeditionary Electronic Warfare Squadron deployed to the Middle East during the war in Iraq.

While bored, sitting in a tent in the desert, I decided to write a book, “A Theory of Power”, which resulted in this web site, and is hopefully why you’re reading this bio. I separated from the Air Force in June of 2004. At present I am attending school and working as an intelligence analyst. I live in Colorado with my wife, Julie. I don’t know what the next few years will hold, but hopefully there will be more thinking and writing, both on this blog and elsewhere. Please feel free to contact me.

David Wearing wonders whether Muslims are from Mars & Europeans are from Venus.

The World Social Forum: Challenging Empires is a committed but critical anthology of essays on the theory and practice of the Forum, with essays by wo/men from many parts of the world, with many different points of view. This online version is abbreviated from the printed original, published by Viveka, New Delhi.”

Posted in Anarchism, Cats, Media, Music, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

The Turgid Miasma of Existence

i shoulda been a contender
i shoulda followed the rules
i shoulda married the girl next door
i shoulda not been a fool
i shoulda paid more attention
i shoulda listened in school

got to re-prioritise
get that corporate style
do an anthony robbins seminar
and meet my inner child
then i’ll unleash the power within
and get that winning smile

i shoulda exercised daily
i shoulda brushed after meals
i shoulda gone to church sunday
i shoulda learnt some ideals
i shoulda counted my blessings
i shoulda lodged an appeal

got to re-prioritise
get that corporate style
get the new ikea catalogue
and some really bitchin’ tiles
then i’ll unleash the power within
and get that winning smile

i shoulda reached my potential
i shoulda kicked some real ass
i shoulda gone into business
i shoulda been middle class

The Manly Environment Centre is celebrating its 15th birthday this week at Manly Cove.

Festivities include a performance from The Rifles, speeches from Peter Garrett and others and a special art exhibition at nearby Oceanworld.

It all kicks off at 5:30pm.

My favourite band. Are playing. This Thursday… in Sydney.

In other news… my bookmarks are overloaded. So I’m gonna dump some of ’em here:

Marx Myths & Legends
Introduction

A critical reading of the work of Karl Marx now requires us to lay to one side the myths and legends which have obscured his ideas over the past one hundred and twenty years- distortions and misinterpretations to which perhaps no thinker has been more prone. In one sense, this is not difficult, because there is enough of his writing preserved, albeit in translation, for any of us to read Marx in his own words. Most however have been unwilling or unable to do this. The fifty volumes of the Marx-Engels Collected Works are forbidding, and when beginning as one almost inevitably does, with the received wisdom surrounding Marx’s name, there is much to discourage a reader from seriously taking on the task of understanding Marx. The aim of this project is thus to begin to challenge some of those myths in order to clear the way for a fresh reading of Marx that will hopefully be less prone to the distortions, misunderstandings and blatant falsehoods that have so far surrounded Marx. We believe that what Marx had to say remains of considerable relevance to an understanding of problems we face today, but that a reading of Marx now must maintain a critical caution which does not merely reproduce received ideas- positive or negative- about Marx’s work.

This is a local blog, for global people.

Another source of understanding (as well as right-wing confusion) is ‘Noam Chomsky v. Alan Dershowitz: A Debate on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict’.

Signature is co-edited by Eve Vincent and Marni Cordell, former editors of Spinach7 Magazine. Having suspended publication of the magazine, we want to keep making high quality independent media that is critical and thought provoking. We are interested in ideas, stories and voices that are overlooked by the dominant media, and in contributing to a more diverse and diffuse public culture.

Signature is about putting your name to your ideas. It’s about having the guts to stand behind your convictions. As the media becomes more anonymous, distant, and PR-driven Signature brings you writers who aren’t afraid to make their mark. Distinctive voices, fresh perspectives, quality writing.

Julian Stallabras writes about ‘Spectacle & Terror’ in the New Left Review:

After Gopal Balakrishnan’s engagement with Afflicted Powers in NLR 36, Julian Stallabrass turns to the Retort collective’s conception of spectacle and its Islamist antagonists. Does a Debordian optic occlude the oppositional potential of modern technologies?

(And, moreover, what effects will it have on Collingwood’s chances of doing the cakewalk in 2006?)

Posted in Anarchism, Collingwood, History, Media, Music, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

2006 Trot Guide Update #3.0

Following John Tattersall‘s ignominious defeat in the Victoria park by-election, there’s more bad news for the Socialist Alliance: on March 18 there was an election in South Australia, for the seat of Port Adelaide. At a time when disgust and rage with contemporary capitalism are profoundly felt and deeply rooted — and we are living through a period of many-sided struggle, conscious and unconscious, against the virulent disease that is the production-for-profit system — the SA contested it.

Here are the results:

Port Adelaide
Name // Party // Votes // % Swing
(Bold identifies the sitting MP)

Anne McMenamin // GRN // 980 // 6.3 // +2.5
James Troup // FFP // 838 // 5.4 // +5.4
Kevin Foley // ALP // 10,027 // 64.5 // +6.7
Anna Micheel // LIB // 2,903 // 18.7 // -4.9
Darren Fairweather // ONP // 234 // 1.5
Amy Van Oosten // DEM // 369 // 2.4 // -3.8
John McGill // [SA] // 205 // 1.3 // +1.3
[Informal // 802 // 4.2]

This could be considered a “bad” result. After all, for a socialist party to receive 29 votes less than a party on the far right isn’t exactly “good”… is it? Dunno, maybe March 18 was a time when disgust and rage with contemporary capitalism was only vaguely intuited, and the deeply rooted were in bed, fitfully sleeping through a period of many-sided struggle, almost always unconscious; dreaming, perhaps, of defeating the virulent disease that is the production-for-profit system… later.

Oh yeah.

There were also elections in Tasmania over the weekend. Never ones to set the media ablaze, the SA in Tasmania battled it out with the elusive ‘Tasmania First Party’ and those-who-choose-to-dress-casually for last place. Here are the results from the two seats — Denison and Franklin — in which the SA stood candidates.

Let’s see who won, shall we?

Denison
Party // Votes // % Quotas // Swing
Labor Party // 25,665 // 47.4 // 2.90 // -3.6
Liberal Party // 14,333 // 26.4 // 1.50 // +3.4
Greens // 12,981 // 23.9 // 1.30 // -0.6
Tasmania First // 283 // 0.5 // 0.00 // +0.5
Socialist Alliance // 216 // 0.4 // 0.00 // -0.3 [Linda Seaborn]
Group F // 401 // 0.7 // 0.00 // +0.7
Ungrouped // 437 // 0.8 // 0.00 // +0.8

Franklin
Party // Votes // % Quotas // Swing
Labor Party // 26,794 // 47.2 // 2.90 // -4.5
Liberal Party // 17,858 // 31.4 // 1.90 // +7.8
Greens // 10,888 // 19.2 // 1.10 // -1.2
Socialist Alliance // 232 // 0.4 // 0.00 // +0.1 [Matthew Holloway]
Ungrouped // 962 // 1.7 // 0.10 // +1.7

Hmmm… not exactly a doubleplusgood result there either comrades.

(I give it twelve more months, tops.)

Posted in Trot Guide | Leave a comment