The Mini Psychology of Fascism

Ben Weerheym, a neo-Nazi formerly of Perth, has recently decided to close his blog, avoiceofdissent — for a long period of time known as ‘Patriot Alliance Down Under’ in reflection of its author’s rather grandiose imagination (there being no other members of the ‘Alliance’). avoiceofdissent was established approximately nine months after Ben pled guilty on August 3, 2004, to nine counts of wilful damage for his part in a racist spree of vandalism in Perth, and for which he received a sentence of six months and one day, suspended for 12 months (and for which his fellow neo-Nazis — Damon Paul Blaxall, Daniel Tyrone Klavins, Frank James Lemin and Shannon Mark Post — received custodial sentences).

In addition to the racist fringe attracted to the 57 varieties of nonsense Ben published, during its two-year existence, from May 2005 to May 2007, his blog also managed to come to the attention of a number of other, slightly different audiences; including WA police and the Director of Public Prosecutions. In March 2006, both The West Australian and The Australian carried reports of investigations by these agencies into avoiceofdissent and another one of Ben’s blogs, Leftywatch, for alleged racial villification. Thus according to Dan Box (The Australian):

The Patriot Alliance Down-under blog site… has been used by members of Australia’s “White Nationalist” group to threaten physical violence and single out targets for intimidation by publishing their photographs, telephone numbers and addresses. Posts include a detailed fantasy of rounding up Lebanese men in a bus, then filling the interior with poisonous exhaust fumes. “Imagine the sight, if you will, of all those oily dune coons gasping for air and clawing vainly at the windows,” the post reads.

While Fran Spencer (The West Australian) writes:

While posts on the Patriot Alliance Down-under blog have included references to “oily dune coons”, “sandniggers” and “the Asian invasion”, the Leftywatch blog focuses on publishing pictures and personal details of individuals it claims oppose patriotic activists. Yesterday, the site contained personal details on four Perth individuals including home suburbs, email addresses and places of work along with calls for further information or photos for publication.

Despite protests from a number of the individuals profiled, church groups, ethnic groups, and others, WA police and the DPP took no action. In fact, the racial vilification legislation — introduced in explicit response to a previous outbreak of racial violence orchestrated by Jack Van Tongeren‘s Australian Nationalists Movement, penalties for which were strengthened following Weerheym & Co.’s spree — was not tested by authorities until they had the opportunity to do so by prosecuting, unsuccessfully, an Aboriginal teenager. Nevertheless, partly as a result of this kind of attention, Ben ceased publishing Leftywatch, while the profiles previously contained on this blog were reproduced, slightly altered, on ‘Patriot Alliance Down Under’.

    Those featured on Ben’s blog included journalists Jehan Casinader, Mark Dunn, Joe Hildebrand, Gavin King, Luke McIlveen, Lisa Pryor and Terry Sweetman, academics Karen Brooks and Jamila Hussain, refugee advocate Eddie Whitham, Muslim leaders Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali, Sheik Mohammed Omran and Keysar Trad and Port Macquarie local councillors Rob Drew and Cameron Price. One commenter congratulated Ben for his efforts, stating: “this is excellent information, i hate these fuckers for what they are doing to australia, i would love to torture each and every one of them, especially the imams, and then shoot them in the forehead point blank, filthy muslim scum… arseholes like howard and every other muslim loving politician and politically correct bastard need to have their heads kicked in, and i would do it all for free…”

Of course, since mid-2005, Ben’s activities have also been monitored by FightDemBack!, a number of members of which — including the author — were, until very recently, profiled on his site. Or as Ben puts it: “For years now I have been under repeated attack”, subjected to “ongoing torment” by “hatemongers”. In fact, Ben makes a number of rather dubious claims in the single blog post in which he announces his decision to withdraw from his online ‘Alliance’ with himself, and these claims are worth examining, chewing up, and spitting out.

To begin with, the reasons for Ben’s recent decision are not that difficult to fathom, as he himself outlines: recently, Ben has moved from Perth to another town in WA, and enrolled in a new course of study. His main educator is of African-American descent, and a number of his fellow students are Aboriginal.

    The Wit & Wisdom of Weerheym:

    “Listen here you fuckin’ ugly rock ape. I meant if you were born in NZ or born in a slum somewhere in Africa where your relatives still are — where you should still be. Go back to Africa and die of AIDS, just like the rest of you are! Hahahaha.”

    “Shut the fuck up nigger, you have no right to speak. Get back outside and clean out the chook house before you get lynched boy!”

    (Following a picture of two African-Americans being lynched): “Say hello to your relatives tar boy!”

This new reality, then, only adds to Ben’s sense of upset, especially at the alleged fact — according to Ben anyway — that the local press has expressed an interest in further documenting his vida loca — and even crazier politics — for the benefit of its readers; including, presumably, staff and students. But even prior to this point, it was obvious that Ben was becoming tired of fulfilling the role of a fascist jackass. (I mean, he certainly complains often enough about the burdens this has placed on his poor sore head to make one inclined to believe it.) Thus according to Ben: “I have been punished for my actions many times over yet to this day I am attacked by people who would have [you believe] that they are decent… members of society. The truth is… they are the most hate-filled, malicious people I could imagine”.

Why won’t anyone understand that Ben is the victim?, in other words. The typical reaction of a bully whose bullying ways have been forced to stop. Nevertheless, in order to add credence to his claims of having been subjected to unfair victimisation, Ben proceeds to outline some of his recent family history which, in brief, consists of, from the age of 14, having to contend with a mother suffering from — and eventually succumbing — to cancer, followed shortly thereafter by the death of his father, as a result of a similar illness, when Ben was in his mid-20s. This, and drug abuse, is Ben’s story, and the story of a middle class Dutch immigrant family in decline. As for his involvement in neo-Nazi politics, already a racist bigot, in 2003, Ben the Angry Young Man saw ‘Java’ Jack Van Tongeren, the Angry Middle-Aged Man, on the TV, and the budding racist came to bloom in the ANM / Australian Nationalist Workers Union.

ANM / ANWU leader, Van Tongeren was released from prison in September 2002, after having served a thirteen-year sentence for conspiracy, arson, theft, assault and fraud, the result of a terrorist campaign directed at the Asian population of Perth in the late 1980s. Shortly after his release, Matthew Collins (The Tale of Jack and Jim, The Review, November 2002) wrote the following about Jack and the ANM:

Van Tongeren’s ANM is little more now than a fan club for the fifty-three year old. It produces low grade and low maintenance material on the internet, where a large type face is used to fill the blank pages. Even for Nazis, their material is worse than inept. Pointless, childish and heavy on jingoism, of course, but also high in back-biting, racism, conspiracy theories (dreamt up by Jack while in his prison cell) as well as illiterate.

As part of the “White Pride Coalition” of Australia, the ANM has lost its website on Freeserve and moved to a US internet provider as Van Tongeren once more prepares to launch himself into a bitter campaign against the tolerant majority. Writing soon after his release, Van Tongeren launched an appeal for the $500,000 he feels the ANM needs to relaunch itself back onto the political landscape. The likelihood of this eventuating, other than by his tried and tested methods of robbery and violence is of course, zero. The ANM and their fellow coalitionists’ who believe Jack can lead them towards glory or at least a sizeable entity, are hopelessly out of touch with political reality on the far-right, not just in Australia, but also overseas. Van Tongeren’s former deputy in ANM, Peter Coleman, turned up two years ago in a Sydney garage wearing a white sheet over his head claiming he was the Grand Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan. That was shortly after he was asked to leave One Nation.

And it was to this political wreckage that a mournful Weerheym was apparently drawn, and on whose behalf he — and a small group of other twenty-something fascists, organising themselves as ‘The White Devils’ — sprayed racist slogans on a synagogue, an Asian restaurant, and the home of a Perth anti-racist in July 2004. They also graffitied a war widows’ retirement village — the only crime for which Ben has expressed genuine regret.

According to Ben, he first wrote Uncle Jack in July 2003 — less than a year after Jack’s release from prison. He then proceeded to join the ANM/ANWU, and to play an active role in its activities. At least, Ben freely admits to this now, but when some of these (illegal) activities landed him in court, Ben swore that it wasn’t true, Your Honour. And his lawyer, Michael Tudori, told the Perth Magistrates’ Court that Weerheym was not interested in the ANM, and had not wanted to take part in the graffiti. It was on this basis, and on the basis of his lesser role in the commital of the crimes (Ben was The Getaway Driver) that he avoided a custodial sentence. Note that Ben’s perjury was brought to the attention of authorities in WA, but just as they chose not to pursue racial vilification charges against Ben, they also chose not to pursue Ben for perjury.

Not that Ben Weerheym is a liar. And neither is Benedict Williams. No, Benjamin / Benedict is now a positive person, who reacts positively to other positive people in positive situations, has a great sense of humour, and loves to joke about.

One last thing.

If you see Ben walking down the street when you’re out and about and you have something to say to him or any questions to ask, don’t be shy, go and speak to him: his bark is a lot worse than his bite.

To be continued…

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, State / Politics | 7 Comments

G8: Rowdies go ‘way

“Extremists planning to disrupt next month’s Group of Eight summit of the world’s richest nations could be placed in preventative custody ahead of the meeting, German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said Friday”; and despite the enormous carnage state figureheads from the Group of Eight — Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, the United States and Russia — are responsible for, I’m pretty sure Schäuble is referring to people with an extreme aversion to war and oppression (Interior Minister Advocates Preventative Custody for G8 Rowdies, Deutsche-Welle, May 11, 2007). Wolfgang’s warning comes just days after German authorities launched pre-emptive raids on a number of anti-G8 organising projects (with a view to disrupting protest activities in June), and has also been accompanied by reports in the German press that a number of marches scheduled to take place on June 7 will likely be deemed unlawful assemblies. As remarked upon elsewhere, such measures, unfortunately, are no guarantee that members of the European polity aren’t slightly rowdy in making their demands of the G8 (ranging, one imagines, from ‘Please sir, can we have some more?’ to ‘Fuck off and die!’).

Speaking of which, when the G8 met in 2005, the heads of state gathered in Gleneagles apparently made some kinda agreement to increase ‘development assistance’ to the ‘Third World’. An agreement which last month was declared to have been broken by the body monitoring its implementation: “Almost two years after the G8 group of leading industrial nations promised to boost development assistance by $50bn a year by 2010, the Africa Progress Panel headed by the former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan said rich countries were only 10% of the way to their target” (Larry Elliott and Kate Connolly, In 2005, G8 pledged $50bn for Africa. Now the reality, The Guardian, April 25, 2007).

And speaking of extremist noise terror, Irish multi-millionaire and British establishment figure Bono Bloody Bono has vowed to continue to bore the world with his hat, his glasses, and his complete failure to understand anything to do with issues of wealth and poverty, by again appearing on stage during the G8, on this occasion alongside some Deutsche Geräuschhersteller for a brief rendition of Deine Stimme gegen Armut (Your Voice against Poverty). Hopefully, Paul David Hewson can provide the audience in Rostock, as well as a much vaster audience in Africa, with a few tips on how to avoid falling into that desperate trap; a fate which he has quite spectacularly avoided. Perhaps something along the lines of…

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, Anti-fascism, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Bangladeshi anarchist, human rights activist and journalist, Tasneem Khalil: arrested and released

    Sheesh. I wrote Tasneem a while ago to congratulate him on his reporting, and to express my concern over his safety. The story below has a happy ending.

London, Friday, May 11, 2007 : Bangladesh’s military-backed care-taker government should immediately release Tasneem Khalil, an investigative journalist and part-time Human Rights Watch consultant, who was detained by security forces late last night, Human Rights Watch said today.

Khalil, 26, is a journalist for the Dhaka-based Daily Star newspaper who conducts research for Human Rights Watch. According to his wife, four men in plainclothes who identified themselves as from the ” joint task force” came to the door after midnight on May 11 in Dhaka, demanding to take Khalil away. They said they were placing Khalil “under arrest” and taking him to the Sangsad Bhavan army camp, outside the parliament building in Dhaka.

“We are extremely concerned about Tasneem Khalil’s safety,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “He has been a prominent voice in Bangladesh for human rights and the rule of law, and has been threatened because of that.”

The men did not offer a warrant or any charges, Khalil’s wife said. Using threatening language, they searched the house and confiscated Khalil’s passport, two computers, documents, and two mobile phones.

“It is an emergency; we can arrest anyone,” one of the men said. Another asked if Khalil suffered from any particular physical ailments. They drove Khalil off in a Pajero jeep.

Khalil is a noted investigative journalist who has published several controversial exposes of official corruption and abuse, particularly by security forces. He assisted Human Rights Watch in research for a 2006 report about torture and extrajudicial killings by Bangladesh security forces.

According to Bangladeshi human rights groups, the army has detained tens of thousands of people since a state of emergency was declared on January 11, 2007. A number of those detained are picked up in the middle of the night, as Khalil was, and then tortured.

In Bangladesh, security forces have long been implicated in torture and extrajudicial killings. The killings have been attributed to members of the army, the police, and the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), an elite anti-crime and anti-terrorism force. The Human Rights Watch report Khalil worked on, Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Torture and Extrajudicial Killings by Bangladesh’s Elite Security Force, focused on abuses by the RAB.

Killings in custody remain a persistent problem in Bangladesh. To date, no military personnel are known to have been held criminally responsible for any of the deaths.

Khalil was called in for questioning by military intelligence last week, apparently as part of the military’s campaign to intimidate independent journalists ahead of May 10, 2007, when the army’s three-month legal mandate for ruling under a state of emergency came to an end.

“The Bangladeshi military should be on notice that its actions are being closely watched by the outside world,” Adams said. “Any harm to Tasneem Khalil will seriously undermine the army’s claims to legitimacy and upholding the rule of law.”

    Happy ending?

Bangladeshi journalist released after daylong interrogation, family says
AP / International Herald Tribune
May 12, 2007

DHAKA, Bangladesh: Bangladeshi authorities have released a journalist, detained hours earlier, who had written about alleged human rights abuses by the country’s security forces, his wife said Saturday.

Tasneem Khalil, a journalist at Dhaka’s Daily Star newspaper, was picked up early Friday from his residence in the capital by four men in plain clothes.

Khalil was released later Friday after being interrogated by intelligence officials, his wife Sharmin Afsana Suchi told The Associated Press.

“Yes, he has returned,” Suchi said.

She declined to say whether he was tortured while he was detained.

A government spokesman could not be reached Saturday to comment on Khalil’s detention or subsequent release.

Journalists in Bangladesh are often threatened, assaulted or even killed for writing about political violence, corruption or organized crime.

At least 11 journalists have been killed and dozens maimed in the South Asian nation since 1997, media rights groups say.

On Friday, Suchi said the men who took away her husband told her they were from the Joint Task Force, an army-led security force used by the military-backed government to fight corruption.

“The men said they were placing Khalil under arrest and taking him to an army camp in Dhaka,” she said.

Zafar Sobhan, an assistant editor at the Daily Star, said Friday that Khalil was held without charge or warrant.

Khalil, 26, also works for New York-based Human Rights Watch and runs his own Web site. His colleagues said he recently posted articles on the site criticizing the army and the security forces for alleged human rights abuses.

The detention sparked off widespread concerns among international media and human rights watchdogs.

Human Rights Watch voiced its concern about Khalil while the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, CPJ, in a statement on Friday said the detention is an indication of the fragile state of press freedom in Bangladesh.

“We’re alarmed by the circumstances of his detention,” Joel Simon, Executive Director of the CPJ, said in the statement.

Bangladesh has been under a state of emergency since Jan. 11 when street violence over delayed national elections left more than 30 people dead.

According to Bangladeshi human rights groups, the military-backed government has used the emergency powers to arrest thousands of people. They say many of the detainees were picked up at night.

Posted in Anarchism, Media, State / Politics | Leave a comment

New Saxon = Femmy Nazis

Stephen Lemons, ‘Femmy Nazis’, Phoenix New Times, May 3, 2007, is funny:

“This sardonic sky-soarer’s been spending a butt-load of hours on the Net of late, studying all the far-right ravens on the neo-Nazi networking site Newsaxon.com, a racist MySpace, where bigoted dillweeds with time on their hands and Adolf Hitler in their hearts can let their fascist freak flags fly. As you’ll recall, this beaked biped reported last week that two-ton former Mesa City Council candidate and Rusty Childress-chum J.T. Ready had been outed by the ADL for having a profile on the white power Web site under the handle Viking Son…”

What’s also funny is the fact that Perth-based, ailurophobic net-Nazi Ben Weerheym appears to have abandoned his blog, avoiceofdissent, for the greener, dillweed-filled pastures of New Saxon… I guess it just doesn’t pay to mess with Bübi, eh?

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, Media | 118 Comments

G8: Stay in your homes; you’ll only get hurt

    David Gordon Smith, G-8 Raids ‘A Warning Shot to Intimidate Activists’, Der Spiegel, May 10, 2007: “German observers feel that police raids on anti-globalization activists Wednesday were aimed at intimidating protesters ahead of the G-8 summit in June, with some commentators writing that the operation was too heavy-handed…” Police in Germany have conducted a number of raids in Berlin, Bremen and Hamburg today, in what is presumably the beginnings of a wave of pre-G8 summit repression. Rupert Murdoch’s man on the spot is Roger Boyes, and Roger reckons that German police fear that “a new brand of left-wing terrorism is about to ignite in Germany, triggered by the swelling protest movement against the G8 summit next month”. The danger has been exacerbated by the alleged presence of a number of RAF members at a May Day demo; “Bearded, grey but unrepentant, the old terrorists, now in their late 50s, are coming out to pass on tips to the new generation” (Leftist terror groups ‘to strike at G8’, The Times, May 10, 2007).

German police search apartments, offices over suspected plans against G-8 summit
AP / International Herald Tribune
May 9, 2007

BERLIN: Hundreds of German police on Wednesday raided the offices and apartments of left-wing activists suspected of planning to disrupt next month’s Group of Eight summit, leading security officials to tighten border controls ahead of the gathering.

The crackdown was an attempt to ward off the violence that has marred past summits, particularly in 2001 in Genoa, Italy, when police and protesters clashed in the streets for days.

Prosecutors said they were investigating more than 18 people suspected of organizing what they called a terrorist group that planned to carry out firebombings and other violent attacks.

Some 900 federal and local police officers in cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen searched about 40 premises used by several anti-globalist groups, they said.

“The militant extreme left groups and their members are suspected of having founded a terrorist group, or of being members of such an organization, with the specific goal of staging fire bombings and other violent attacks in order to disrupt or prevent the upcoming G-8 summit in Heiligendamm,” federal prosecutors said in a statement.

Also Wednesday, Germany’s interior ministry announced it would tighten border controls to screen out violent protesters.

“As part of security measures for the G-8 summit in Heiligendamm, controls can be carried out on various border points … to prevent potential criminals and others intending to use violence from entering Germany,” the ministry said in a statement. “Particular attention will be paid to potentially violent anti-globalization activists.”

People can usually travel freely throughout the European Union once they cross its common border, but individual countries maintain the right to tighten checks for security purposes.

German security officials have built a €12.5-million (US$17-million) fence around the northern seaside resort of Heiligendamm, hoping to keep protesters away from the event, hosted by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The leaders of the United States, Russia, Britain, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan are to attend.

Last year’s meeting in St. Petersburg, Russia, saw few protest[s], and those that were held were generally small, largely due to protesters’ difficulty obtaining entry visas. But Germany is easier to reach from other European countries, and security officials do not want a repetition of the violence from Genoa in which one protester was killed by police.

Federal prosecutors said they had focused on dismantling a particular server [so36.net] where they said many leftist groups and projects maintained their Web sites and mailing lists.

Activists complained the raids were aimed at silencing legitimate protests against the G-8. Marches are planned — with official permission — in nearby Rostock ahead of the summit.

“The only point of these searches is to criminalize and disrupt the protests against the G-8,” the Anti-Fascist Leftists of Berlin said in a statement. “The accusation that terrorists would coordinate their movements through a leftist-run Internet server is ridiculous.”

In December, anti-G-8 activists splashed paint on a hotel in Heiligendamm and security officials in Hamburg cited a number of other lower-scale attacks, including several firebombings there and the torching of a car belonging to a top Finance Ministry official.

Germany swoops on militants before G8 summit
Noah Barkin / Reuters / The Washington Post
May 9, 2007

BERLIN (Reuters) – German authorities on Wednesday launched raids in six northern states and said they would impose new border controls over fears left-wing radicals were planning attacks to disrupt a June G8 summit on the Baltic coast.

Some 900 security officials were searching 40 sites in Berlin, Brandenburg, Hamburg, Bremen, Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony, the federal prosecutor’s office said in a statement, adding it had opened two separate investigations.

“We suspect those targeted, who belong to the militant extreme-left scene, of founding a terrorist organization or being members of such an organization, that is planning arson attacks and other actions to severely disrupt or prevent the early-summer G8 summit in Heiligendamm from taking place,” the prosecutor’s office said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel will host the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States at the June 6-8 summit, which will focus on climate change, African poverty and economic cooperation.

Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble announced a tightening of border controls ahead of the G8 summit. The actions are similar to those taken by Germany during last year’s World Cup tournament to prevent an influx of soccer hooligans.

“We are particularly focused on dangers arising from violent globalization opponents,” the ministry said.

Prosecutors suspect the left-wing militants they are investigating of being behind nine minor attacks in the Hamburg area and three in the Berlin region in the past two years.

Those attacks include an incident last December when a car was set on fire in front of the home of deputy finance minister Thomas Mirow and windows and walls of his house were splattered with paint.

“WAVE OF REPRESSION”

Anti-G8 group “Gipfelsoli” denounced the raids, accusing authorities of a “wave of repression” to dismantle the movement’s communication network

“All attempts to criminalize us do not change the fact that we will use the G8 (summit) to cast a spotlight on the injustices of this world,” Hanne Jobst, a Berlin-based member of the group said in a statement.

Germany has not experienced any major left-wing violence since the militant Red Army Faction (RAF), which waged a bloody two-decade long campaign of killings and kidnappings, announced in 1998 that it was disbanding.

But authorities are taking aggressive pre-emptive measures to ensure the summit goes as smoothly as the World Cup did.

A 2.5-metre high steel fence, topped with razor wire, has been placed in a 14-km ring around Heiligendamm and police will control access through airport-style X-ray machines.

Around 40 km down the coast from the Kempinski Hotel where the leaders will meet, officials in the city of Rostock are expecting a demonstration of up to 100,000 people on the weekend before the event.

(Additional reporting by Philip Jarke in Hamburg, Sabine Siebold and Markus Krah in Berlin)

Wave of repression against anti-G8 structures
solidarity group
May 9, 2007
Press release [Edited]

At 8am on Wednesday morning a wave of searches took place against left structures throughout Germany. Those targeted were social projects and individuals that are organizing against the coming G8 summit — or suspected of doing so.

In Berlin, at least seven flats and office spaces were searched, including two offices in Bethanien, a social centre in Kreuzberg, Berlin, and the Fusion shop in the same district. The latter is a space used by an anti-fascist organization and the Interventionist Left [‘The “Interventionist Left” within which many autonomous and anti-fascist groups are organized, is part of the alliance, and it openly announces: “All forms of action are legitimate”.’]. Further, a bookshop in Mehringhof and the office spaces of several alternative media projects in Lausitzer Straße have been searched.

The criminal investigation police are placing special emphasis on the alternative Internet server so36.net. Many left and alternative projects have their websites, mailing lists and mail addresses hosted there. In this way, the communication structure of the anti-G8 movement has been hit on a crucial nerve centre.

In Hamburg, the repression is aimed against the social centre Rote Flora and diverse housing projects. Also in suburbs surrounding Berlin searches are taking place. And there are also reports of searches in the city of Bremen.

The orders for the searches are based on §129a: “Formation of a terrorist association with the aim to stop the G8 summit”. The seemingly random selection of many left housing and infrastructural projects makes clear that the investigation is being used in order to weaken the mobilization against the G8. “Probably diverse cases of property damage serve as an excuse for these investigations”, according to the Campinski Press Group. One of these cases occurred at the Kempinski Hotel, where the G8 summit is going to take place. The hotel was targeted with paintballs some months ago.

The context provided by the §129a investigation is being used in order to gather data about the protest movement. Besides, such measures have — most likely intended — intimidating effects. Only 2% of all §129a investigations result in sentencing.

However: “Who invites the G8 summit, also invites the protest against it”, maintains Hanne Jobst of the Berlin Bethanien office. “All attempts to criminalize this movement will not prevent us from exposing worldwide inequalities during the G8 summit”.

The repressive acts of the criminal investigation police are not entirely surprising. The left and radical left resistance against the G8 has reached an uncontrollable level for the police. “So far, the police only tried to split the resistance in the public media through hallucinating about an army of ‘anarchists’. Now they will try to sabotage the organizational structures”, Jobst explains further.

“It is noteworthy that the searches are targeted against all those parts of the resistance that refuse to direct claims to the G8, because they refuse the G8 in general as an illegitimate institution”, explains a spokesperson for Gipfelsoli Infogruppe.

    See also : The Approaching G-8 Summit: Big Trouble in Little Heiligendamm, Marcel Rosenbach, Gunther Latsch and Markus Deggerich, Der Spiegel, May 9, 2007: “…the largest police operation in the history of the German Federal Republic will transform the fenced in enclosure around Heiligendamm into the equivalent of a maximum-security prison” | Following Raids on Wednesday, G-8 Opponents Take to the Streets, Der Spiegel, May 10, 2007: “Thousands of G-8 opponents staged demonstrations across Germany on Wednesday evening, with the protest in Hamburg turning violent. The demos followed police raids on left-wing activists…”
Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Atenco leaders get 67 years

“Come fly with me, let’s fly, let’s fly away…” I used to think these were just the lyrics to a song. But Mexican authorities — El Presidente Vicente Fox in particular — take flying very seriously, and have just sentenced three poor bastards to ridiculously long terms as punishment for successfully stopping the construction of an airport in San Salvador Atenco, Mexico. The three — Ignacio del Valle, Felipe Álvarez and Héctor Galindo — are leaders of the Frente del Pueblo en Defensa de La Tierra or People’s Front in Defense of the Land (FPDT). The Mexican Government says ‘kidnapping’ is the crime, but not even they believe it (Eduardo Alonso, Atenco leaders get 67 years, El Universal, May 6, 2007). See also ‘Who Can Imprison the Fury of a Volcano?’, a letter from del Valle, May 4, 2007; People’s Front in Defense of the Land communiqué, May 7, 2007:

To the People of Mexico:

Those who have heard the lies of Televisa, TV Azteca, and all the other (dis)information media, we ask that you now know the voice of the people of Atenco:

We must put a stop to this treacherous, lying, corrupt, and killer government. If we, those from below, don’t do it – nobody will.

In the Pasta de Conchos mine, in the state of Coahuila, today are forgotten the bodies of 65 miners, whose deaths were caused by the negligence of the government and the union bosses, and by the inhumane conditions in which they labored, also endured by millions of workers throughout the country to this day.

After this crime, the PANista government of Vicente Fox, together with the PRDista administration in (the state of) Michoacán, led by Lázaro Cárdenas Batel, used their armed police to assassinate at least 2 other miners in (the steel factory) Sicartsa, and wounded many others with bullets, in the Lázaro Cárdenas port, where, for years, hundreds of workers maintain a strong fight for the democratization of their union and for the defense of the rights of the people, marginalized by the interests of false “leaders of the miners”; the union bosses Napoleón Gómez Urrutia and Elías Morales, who fight amongst themselves for the benefit of their own mafias, not for the working miners…

Posted in State / Politics | Leave a comment

Kiwi Anarchists Continue Triumphant World Tour

It’s been a busy week for our heroes. After successfully antagonising police in Los Angeles on May Day, 40 Kiwi Anarchists have flown into Paris in order to cynically exploit naïve locals, whose disgust at the Presidential victory of sociopathic Yanqui neo-con Nicolas Sarkozy has been both ‘turned into’ and ‘marred’ by violence. Thus in addition to distributing flags and masks to concerned parents in Paris, in a new development which worries experts at the Homeland Security Research Centre, the crazy New Zealanders arranged for the ritual burning, dismemberment and even stamping upon of an effigy of Monsieur Sarkozy (see below). Scienticians agree that this new tactic is clearly a signal, and possible evidence of a thawing in relations between the Kiwis and Iranian authorities (who like nothing better than a good effigy burning, especially if it’s accompanied by a good stomping). However, making funding avenues too obvious to the West may create antagonisms with the Kiwis’ erstwhile comrades among the jet-setting hordes of English, German and Swedish football hooligans, currently on sabbatical in Oslo, but previously hard at work blighting protests in Berlin and a number of other European cities with their presence…

Paris riots follow Sarkozy victory
Reuters / The Age
May 7, 2007

Thousands of extra police were drafted in to patrol sensitive suburbs today and a Reuters correspondent saw two cars burning [in] a tough neighbourhood north of Paris. Police said four cars and a bus were torched in another neighbourhood.

Youths also clashed with police in Paris’s Bastille Square and security forces fired repeated rounds of tear gas to try to break up the crowds. Disturbances were also reported in the southern cities of Toulouse and Lyon…

Riots in central Paris after election results
By staff writers and wires
NEWS.com.au
May 7, 2007

CLASHES between police and protestors have been reported in central Paris and the southeastern city of Lyon after conservative leader Nicolas Sarkozy was elected French President overnight.

In the Place de la Bastille in Paris riot police fired tear gas and at least one burst of water cannon after hundreds of rioters – some wearing masks – began throwing bottles, stones and other missiles.

Earlier, a small crowd brandishing black and red anarchist flags set fire to an effigy of Mr Sarkozy before tearing it limb from limb and then stamping on it. Demonstrators chanted “police everywhere, justice nowhere”…

Police clash with protesters after French presidential win
Radio Australia
May 7, 2007

Riot police have fired tear gas at stone-throwing protesters who gathered in central Paris to demonstrate against the presidential election victory of right-winger Nicolas Sarkozy.

The clashes took place on the Place de la Bastille where about 5,000 supporters of the defeated Socialist candidate Segolene Royal had gone to await the election results.

Up to 300 rioters, some of whom were masked, made running attacks on riot police who took up positions at the entrance to boulevards leading onto the square.

Earlier a small crowd of protesters, brandishing black and red anarchist flags, set fire to an effigy of Mr Sarkozy in the square before tearing it limb from limb and then stamping on it.

Elsewhere in the capital the president-elect appeared before cheering crowds and promised to be “president for all the French without exception.”

Mr Sarkozy beat Ms Royal by 53 per cent of the vote to 47 per cent, according to projections.

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | 4 Comments

G20: Protest, Politics & Policing (& Protest)

    This coming Friday, May 11, @ 10am, is when approximately two dozen people will be having their committal mentions @ the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court, courtesy of Victoria Police Crime Task Force 400. (A committal mention is a hearing in which the court decides if there’s sufficient evidence to go to trial.) And who knows, there may well be a solidarity gathering outside the Court @ 233 William Street (Cnr. William & Lonsdale Streets).

Protest, Politics and Policing
Victoria Stead and Shane Reside
Arena Magazine
April–May 2007

In the aftermath of last November’s protests against the G20 summit in Melbourne, Victorian Police have conducted a massive operation against individuals allegedly involved in the three day mobilisation. Under the banner of Taskforce Salver, dozens of houses have been raided, undercover snatch squads have been used to grab people from the streets, and photos of individuals deemed ‘persons of interest’ have been published in newspapers and on Crime Stoppers. At the time of writing, over 35 people have been arrested and charged with offences including riot, affray and conduct endangering persons. Some of these charges carry sentences of up to ten years imprisonment. The Police operation over the last few months suggests disturbing shifts in the policing of protest and dissent. Particularly, the response to the G20 mobilisation highlights the dangerous relationship between ‘community policing’ and more authoritarian tendencies within the Victorian Police force.

Compared to the policing of the demonstrations against the World Economic Forum in Melbourne in 2000, the police response to the G20 protest has been markedly different. When tens of thousands of people converged at the Crown Casino [seven] years ago to successfully disrupt the summit of the World Economic Forum, police responded with a massive display of violent force. Unprovoked charges, overhead baton strikes and outright brutality left scores of demonstrators injured, many of them seriously. In the lead up to the G20 protest, Police Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon publicly made it clear that the policing operation this time was not going to be a repeat performance. Instead, she employed a range of tactics including: a centrally controlled and staged increase in police force ‘appropriate’ to the context; low barriers instead of high security fences around the summit site; and the use of ‘crowd safety officers’ whose role was to circulate amongst demonstrators handing out cards recommending the suitability of alternate protest venues which were, not surprisingly, out of sight of the G20 delegates, inner-city businesses, and pretty much everyone else in Melbourne.

Nixon’s ‘softly, softly’ approach fits within the model of ‘community policing’ which has been advocated by the Victorian Police command since the early 1980s while facing ongoing resistance from the bulk of the Police rank and file. Studies conducted in the 1990s showed that community policing continued to be viewed by the majority of officers as primarily a public relations exercise. Instead, rank and file officers have tended to support the more authoritarian approach advocated by the powerful Police Association. The tension between these two approaches – community policing and authoritarian policing – is in turn deeply rooted in the ongoing power play between the Police Association and the Victorian Police command.

The recent policing of protests such as the G20 needs to be seen within the context of this struggle within the Victorian Police force. Increasingly, the approach to the policing of political dissent is being shaped by a dangerous combination of elements from both of the tendencies within the force. As Jude McCulloch has argued, community policing has become the ‘velvet glove that covers the iron fist’ of increasingly repressive and authoritarian policing in Victoria. While this has long been evident in over-policed Indigenous and working class communities across the state, the G20 mobilisation and its aftermath provides a case in point of the dangers of this twin-bladed approach.

Based on a community policing framework, Nixon’s ‘softly, softly’ approach hinged on containing the mobilisation. Protest was to be allowed, so long as it remained non-contentious, passive and preferably out of sight. Given these parameters, a confrontation between police and protestors was always going to be highly likely. While there is a wide diversity of opinions amongst protestors regarding tactics, a belief in the need for direct action has long been a hallmark of progressive social movements. And the space for action offered by the community policing approach simply does not allow this.

As it happened, there were attempts by demonstrators to breach the police cordons and disrupt the G20 summit meeting on the first day of the mobilisation. Clashes with police ensued, and it quickly became clear that the Chief Commissioner’s approach did not enjoy the support of the rank and file officers who were there. Nixon had been scheduled to appear at a fundraising dinner that Saturday evening, performing a rendition of ‘It’s Raining Men’, no less. Instead, she was forced to cancel her appointment and rush to the barricades to appease her surly troops.

It would appear that in the face of rank and file unrest, a green light was given for police to utilize all the force at their disposal for both the remainder of the mobilisation and the days and months following. Certainly, there appears to have been a significant and rapid turn around in police tactics. When a small group of protestors gathered at the Melbourne Museum the next day – where G20 delegates were enjoying a little cultural respite from the hard work of summit negotiations – police launched without warning into an unprovoked baton charge. One woman was so badly injured that she required hospitalisation.

The authoritarian policing tactics have continued since. A round up of protestors began on the morning of the 18th, with snatch squads grabbing people off the streets. One man, Drasko Boljevic, was snatched by unidentified men, thrown in the back of an unmarked white van and held for hours. Not only did he have no idea who his assailants were, it later transpired that he had not even been present at the protest. Dozens more have faced intimidation and harassment, regardless of their degree of involvement in any violence. In the backlash against Nixon’s approach, the Police Association has [decried] the ‘lack of appropriate resources’ given to officers, and the ‘grave OH&S dangers’ they faced. And in a style that ex-Queensland Premier Joh Bielke-Peterson would be proud of, it has even gone so far as to suggest a blanket ban on the right to protest. Unsurprisingly, mainstream media commentators and politicians have jumped into the fray, bemoaning the decay of law-and-order and going all out to demonise those involved in the mobilisation as violent thugs.

Regardless of the debate over the use of property damage, the policing of the G20 and the continuing actions of the Salver Taskforce should be a cause for concern for everyone who believes in the need for grassroots movements to organise in opposition to the neoliberal agenda being pushed by institutions such as the G20. The twin-bladed approach of community policing and authoritarian tendencies, arising from the tensions and power struggles within the Victorian Police force, has potentially grave implications for the right of ordinary people to dissent. The space for protest is shrinking for us all. As we come up against the barrage of neoliberalism, militarism, environmental destruction, racist border controls and draconian IR legislation, the right to protest is something we all need to defend.

Posted in State / Politics | 1 Comment

Good triumphs over Evil

COLLINGWOOD 11.20 (86)
Adelaide 9.8 (62)

Posted in Collingwood | 2 Comments

Combet bumped into Parliament

Australian working class united in joy

Greg Combet confirmed his entry into Parliamentary politics in 2000, when he was appointed ACTU Secretary — his appointment a reflection of his many promotional efforts on behalf of the ALP (efforts which peaked recently with the ACTU-sponsored ‘Vote Labor’ campaign). Formal notification of his finding a comfortable seat (in Charlton, NSW), however, has been delayed by media until today. Combet knows a lot about Charlton, just as he knew much about being a dockworker before beginning his career with the WWF in 1987. Further, while a seat in Parliament has long been assured, Combet’s future Cabinet role was in doubt until Rupert Murdoch consecrated a change in Government during Kevin Rudd’s audience with him in April. Media, however, are again expected to delay the announcement until some time in November, when formal ceremonies are expected to have been completed.

Posted in State / Politics | 2 Comments