Collingwood rejoins winners’ list!

And about f@#$ing time too…

COLLINGWOOD 19.13 (127) def. West Coast 13.12 (90)

Collingwood has shaken off a disappointing five weeks of football to defeat West Coast by 37 points at Telstra Dome on Saturday afternoon.

In a highly entertaining encounter, the Pies were lifted by their captain Nathan Buckley to run the game out strongly, denying any sort of miraculous Eagles comeback with the 19.13 (127) to 13.12 (90) win.

‘Impressive Pies overhaul depleted Weasels’ (SportsAustralia.com)

‘Magpies back to winning ways’ (ABC)

‘Magpies in breakthrough AFL win’ (The Age)

‘Magpies snap losing streak’ (Realfooty / The Age)

‘Pies bounce back to beat Weasels’ (FoxSports)

‘Magpies in welcome win over Weasels’ (The Age)

Words of wisdom from Mick :

“Sometimes you’ve got to look at the bad to value the good, then you’ve got to do a comparison,” Malthouse said.

“If you’re a smart enough player … to realise the difference between the previous three weeks compared to this week … it’s poles apart.

“It’s up to the player group, as we know what we believe took place and we can build on that.

“I’m not saying we needed those losses by any stretch of the imagination, but what it’s done is reinforced certain values that we’ve had.”

‘Fraser runs riot as Weasels rue Gardiner’s absence’ (Realfooty / The Age)

‘Magpies look dangerous after mid-season slump’ (Realfooty / The Age)

‘Malthouse relief at Pies’ win’ (Realfooty / The Age)

‘Buckley makes most of move’ (Sunday Herald Sun)

[Anti-fascist, pro-Collingwood] ‘Youth rally makes Mick happy’ (FoxSports)

Ha!

Posted in Collingwood | Leave a comment

Let’s do the Kutasi!

Bugger it.

The recent media-storm-in-a-teacup regarding the sensational revelation that NSW Young Liberals aren’t exactly backwards-about-coming-forwards inre their attitudes towards women, queers and blacks prompted some ‘neo-con’ (statist reactionary) to leave a post on my blog:

    “The ‘Racist, sexist, homophobic’ chant is a parody of the rhetoric the left use when describing Liberal students. Few actually consider themselves racist, sexist or homophobic.”

Which theme James the New Conservative elaborates on his blog, and to which the following (slightly reformulated) is a reply:

:::::::

    Wednesday, July 19, 2006

    ABC hatchet job

    “They [the ABC] seem to be on a bit of a crusade [against the Tories].”

I’m unconvinced: the real crusade is currently being led by George II, with HoWARd — Patron Saint of the Young Liberals, and former President (1964/1965) of the NSW Branch — content to play the role of snivelling sidekick, and the Young Liberals his dysfunctional cheer squad.

Besides, if ALP branch-stacking is deemed newsworthy, then so too is Tory Party branch-stacking. And the criticisms extend beyond assertions of ‘social conservatism’. (That is, if you regard racism, sexism and homophobia as distinct from social conservatism.)

What’s interesting, I think, is the shift in power that has been established through the use of such practices; secondly, the implications this has for the future development of the Party and NSW state politics.

As for Imre… [whom James cites as providing proof of the ABC’s nefarious activities] there are two claims in the article (‘Liberals complain of ABC threats’, The Australian, July 13, 2006) which might constitute evidence of “thuggery and intimidation”. The first is an extract from the [Tory Party’s] letter of complaint [to the ABC]:

“The standard testimony from these members is that (the reporter) has used unwarranted demands of a subpoena to try and obtain an interview,” the letter says.

Which is definitely odd behaviour for a journalist. I mean, if I read the allegation correctly. (They’re alleged to have issued / threatened to issue demands to appear in court?) If so, this would presumably be considered unethical under the semi-mythical journalists’ code of ethics that Media Watch keeps tut-tutting at infractions of… again… and again… and again. Not to mention the law?

In any case, I think it would first need to be established that the journalist’s (alleged) conduct was as a result of their carrying out instructions from a superior before a conscious campaign of disembiggening of the Tories could be attributed to the ABC as a whole.

As for the second :

A former member of the Liberal Party, Kyle Kutasi, has made a statutory declaration claiming the reporter told him: “I know more about you than you could possibl[y] know. I have files on you. I have photos of you. I have statements from women saying that you assaulted them.”

What Salusinszky fails to mention is the fact that this cat called Katusi is not just ‘a former member’ of the Tories, but:

a) a former President of the Sydney University Liberal Club (2001/2002);

b) in April 2004, received “congratulations” from the NSW Young Liberals for being one of “our very vocal hecklers” at some daft debate with Young Labor;

c) if Salusinszky read the SMH, he might have read the following (July 1, ‘Party Animals’):

The most controversial accusation made by moderates is the use of “double agents” or “sleepers” by the conservatives – people who join the party, claim to have moderate views and become friends with moderates, while secretly working for the right and trying to take over branches.

One of those who has come under attack as a sleeper is Kyle Kutasi, who is engaged to Clarke’s daughter, Anne-Marie. Kutasi is said to have taken over three Young Liberal branches, including Newtown, by posing first as a moderate and bringing in friends. He denies the accusations but will not comment further, saying he has been burnt by journalists in the past.

In an interview two years ago, [Alex] Hawke told the Herald the double agent accusations were lies. He said people who were initially interested in the left had simply decided their views were better suited to the right. But Hawke also admitted he had embarked on a recruitment campaign.

d) in his inaugural speech (27/05/03) to Parliament David Clarke said:

“The Liberal Party now has a new young generation of members of talent and dedication to carry our party forward. Nicholas Campbell of our party’s State Executive, Alex Hawke, the new President of the Young Liberals, and his three vice-presidents Natasha McLaren, Anthony Orkin and KYLE KATUSI, are all in the vanguard of our party’s organisational wing. I take great pride in being a member of a party comprised of such good young people as these.”

e) he’s one of the principal villains of the piece.

But if it’s true that ABC employees aren’t “very fond” of the Tories, one could be forgiven for thinking that it’s got something to do with Tory Party policy.

For this reason — taking Liberal Party claims seriously, but without seriously investigating them — and for many others, Imre Salusinszky merits the term ‘hack’ far more than do the award-winning journalists at Four Corners.

    “I doubt any actually consider themselves racist, sexist or homophobic, a point underscored by the fact that women, gays and people not of Anglo-Saxon background have been known to repeat the chant.”

What the young, self-declared ‘racist, sexist, homophobes’ consider themselves is surely beside the point. That is, if the students who did so say ‘sorry for the offence we acknowledge we caused through our insensitivity’, great. The point its use in the Lateline report underscores is not concerned with whether or not this chant is popular among “women, gays and people not of Anglo-Saxon background”, but the political shift in the Young Liberals to the (far) right it represents.

Finally, you’re ignoring the context of these remarks.

    “Further, the God save the Queen performance was in many cases delivered by staunch republicans.”

Again, this is beside the point.

JOHN STEWART: In 2004, Aboriginal elder Ted Lovett opened the national student conference with a speech from the land’s traditional owners. He says that throughout his speech, Liberal students sang God Save the Queen.

TED LOVETT, BALLARAT COMMUNITY ELDER: I sort of, you know, I just sort of stopped dead and I let ’em finish their song and when they finished, I said, “alright you’ve had your national anthem,” I said, “I’ll give you mine”.

JOHN STEWART: Mr Lovett says the students were later removed.

TED LOVETT: You know how they humiliated me, they not only humiliated me, but they humiliated all elders right across Australia and all Aboriginal people.

JOHN STEWART: The Aboriginal elder wants an apology and a guarantee that it won’t happen again at this year’s conference.

James again :

    “It’s all about taking the piss out of the left, and seeing how angry we can make them. The Michael Moore-like editing doesn’t help the representation of ‘young liberals.'”

I’d have to watch it again before I compare the work of Vanessa Hughes and Jessica Tyrrell to Michael Moore (I expect they’d be flattered — he is kinda popular, after all!).

What it’s “about” you seem to think is the Young Liberals’ sole right to declare, which is, basically, ‘taking the piss out of lefties’. How does shouting at a conference that you’re racist, sexist and homophobic, or disrespecting Aboriginal elders achieve that? And why do you so easily allow the ‘left’ to be identified with opposition to bigotry? Do you really believe that opposition to racism, sexism and homophobia, and showing a modicum of respect for invited guests — who are simply being generous with their time — is confined to ‘leftists’?

All such antics demonstrate is that the Young Liberals are rude prats, with a stunning lack of imagination when it comes to taking the piss, and a really bad sense of humour.

Posted in Media, State / Politics, Student movement | 5 Comments

“The Aristocrats!”

Just when you might have thought that the world was run by people of perhaps passing intelligence (???) this item from the BBC says it all!

Transcript: Bush and Blair’s unguarded chat

The conversation

A transcript of the off-the-cuff conversation between US President George W Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair during a break at the G8 conference in Russia.

The president was caught on tape using an expletive as he described the actions of Hezbollah in attacking Israel.

They also discussed the exchange of gifts.

Bush: Yo, Blair. How are you doing?

Blair: I’m just…

Bush: You’re leaving?

Blair: No, no, no not yet. On this trade thingy… [indistinct]

Bush: Yeah, I told that to the man.

Blair: Are you planning to say that here or not?

Bush: If you want me to.

Blair: Well, it’s just that if the discussion arises…

Bush: I just want some movement.

Blair: Yeah.

Bush: Yesterday we didn’t see much movement.

Blair: No, no, it may be that it’s not, it may be that it’s impossible.

Bush: I am prepared to say it.

Blair: But it’s just I think that we need to be an opposition…

Bush: Who is introducing the trade?

Blair: Angela [Merkel, the German Chancellor].

Bush: Tell her to call ‘em.

Blair: Yes.

Bush: Tell her to put him on, them on the spot. Thanks for the sweater – it’s awfully thoughtful of you.

Blair: It’s a pleasure.

Bush: I know you picked it out yourself.

Blair: Oh absolutely – in fact I knitted it!

[Laughter]

Bush: What about Kofi? [Annan] – he seems all right. I don’t like his ceasefire plan. His attitude is basically ceasefire and everything sorts out… But I think…

Blair: Yeah, no I think the [indistinct] is really difficult. We can’t stop this unless you get this international business agreed.

Bush: Yeah.

Blair: I don’t know what you guys have talked about, but as I say I am perfectly happy to try and see what the lie of the land is, but you need that done quickly because otherwise it will spiral.

Bush: I think Condi [US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice] is going to go pretty soon.

Blair: But that’s, that’s, that’s all that matters. But if you… you see it will take some time to get that together.

Bush: Yeah, yeah.

Blair: But at least it gives people…

Bush: It’s a process, I agree. I told her your offer to…

Blair: Well… it’s only if I mean… you know. If she’s got a…, or if she needs the ground prepared as it were… Because obviously if she goes out she’s got to succeed, if it were, whereas I can go out and just talk.

Bush: You see the irony is what they need to do is get Syria, to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit and it’s all over…

Blair: [indistinct]

Bush: [indistinct]

Blair: Dunno… Syria…

Bush: Why?

Blair: Because I think this is all part of the same thing…

Bush: [With mouth full of bread] Yeah.

Blair: Look – what does he think? He thinks if Lebanon turns out fine. If you get a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way.

Bush: Yeah, yeah, he is sweet.

Blair: He is honey. And that’s what the whole thing is about. It’s the same with Iraq.

Bush: I felt like telling Kofi to call, to get on the phone to Assad and make something happen.

Blair: Yeah.

Bush: [indistinct]

Blair: [indistinct]

Bush: We are not blaming the Lebanese government.

Blair: Is this…? [Blair taps the microphone in front of him and the sound is cut]

Story from BBC NEWS.

Published: 2006/07/18 16:25:12 GMT

© BBC MMVI

The Aristocrats!

[Shake of the balaclava : Mannie & Kendall]

Posted in !nataS, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

On the Israeli state’s latest recruitment drive for Islamic terrorist groups

There is “great rejoicing at the nation’s capital”. So says the morning’s paper.

The enemy’s fleet has been annihilated.

Mothers are delighted because other mothers have lost sons just like their own;

Wives and daughters smile at the thought of new-made widows and orphans;

Strong men are full of glee because other strong men are either slain or doomed to rot alive in torments;

Small boys are delirious with pride and joy as they fancy themselves thrusting swords into soft flesh, and burning and laying waste such homes as they themselves inhabit;

Another capital is cast down with mourning and humiliation just in proportion as ours is raised up, and that is the very spice of our triumph…

This is life–this is patriotism–this is rapture!

But we–what are we, men or devils? and our Christian capital–what is it but an outpost of Hell?

Ernest Crosby, “War and Hell”, 1898
(Written at the outbreak of the Spanish-American War.)

On Israel and Lebanon : Robert Fisk, ‘The child lies like a rag doll…’, The Independent, July 20, 2006.

Posted in History, Poetry, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Barcelona, 1936

Barcelona, 1936
from Homage to Catalonia, by George Orwell.

This was in late December 1936…

The Anarchists were still in virtual control of Catalonia and the revolution was still in full swing. To anyone who had been there since the beginning it probably seemed even in December or January that the revolutionary period was ending; but when one came straight from England the aspect of Barcelona was something startling and overwhelming.

It was the first time that I had ever been in a town where the working class was in the saddle. Practically every building of any size had been seized by the workers and was draped with red flags or with the red and black flag of the Anarchists; every wall was scrawled with the hammer and sickle and with the initials of the revolutionary parties; almost every church had been gutted and its images burnt. Churches here and there were being systematically demolished by gangs of workmen.

Every shop and cafe had an inscription saying that it had been collectivised; even the bootblacks had been collectivized and their boxes painted red and black. Waiters and shop-walkers looked you in the face and treated you as an equal. Servile and even ceremonial forms of speech had temporarily disappeared. Nobody said ‘Senor’ or ‘Don’ or even ‘Usted’; everyone called everyone else ‘Comrade’ or ‘Thou’, and said ‘Salud!’ instead of ‘Buenos dias’.

Tipping had been forbidden by law since the time of Primo de Rivera; almost my first experience was receiving a lecture from a hotel manager for trying to tip a lift-boy. There were no private motor-cars, they had all been commandeered, and the trams and taxis and much of the other transport were painted red and black. The revolutionary posters were everywhere, flaming from the walls in clean reds and blues that made the few remaining advertisements look like daubs of mud. Down the Ramblas, the wide central artery of the town where crowds of people streamed constantly to and fro, the loud-speakers were bellowing revolutionary songs all day and far into the night.

And it was the aspect of the crowds that was the queerest thing of all. In outward appearance it was a town in which the wealthy classes had practically ceased to exist. Except for a small number of women and foreigners there were no ‘well-dressed’ people at all. Practically everyone wore rough working-class clothes, or blue overalls or some variant of militia uniform.

All this was queer and moving. There was much in this that I did not understand, in some ways I did not not even like it, but I recognized it immediately as a state of affairs worth fighting for. Also, I believed that things were as they appeared, that this was really a workers’ State and that the entire bourgeoisie had either fled, been killed or voluntarily come over to the workers’ side; I did not realise that great numbers of well-to-do bourgeois were simply lying low and disguising themselves as proletarians for the time being.

Posted in Anarchism, Anti-fascism, History | Leave a comment

Strangling the life out of fascism : Spain, 1936

‘Strangle the life out of fascism’

The Iron Column defended its actions against the campaign of vilification mounted by the Spanish Communist Party and the Republican government in the following manifesto aimed at showing that its militants were not given to rhetoric and meant business:

“. . . As anarchists, we who – under the familiar denomination ‘Iron Column’ – struggle against the clerical and militarist reaction on the Teruel Front are concerned, of course, with the problems of the front, but also with those of the rearguard. Consequently when we realised that in Valencia things were not moving in the direction that we wished, when we noted that the rearguard, far from being a reassurance to us, was a focus of concern and misgivings, we resolved to intervene and, to that end, we dispatched the following requests to the relevant organisations:

(1) that the Civil Guard be disarmed and disbanded;
(2) that all of the armed forces of the state in the rearguard (Assault Guards, Carabineros, Seguridad, etc.) be sent immediately to the front and;
(3) that all records and archives held in capitalist and state institutions be destroyed forthwith.”

These requests had their foundations in revolutionary and ideological considerations. As anarchists and as revolutionaries, we considered the existence of the Civil Guard to be a threat; it is a reactionary corps that has, throughout its life and more especially during the present revolt, clearly displayed its mentality and its intentions. The Civil Guard was odious in our eyes for many reasons and we had no confidence in it. So we asked that it might be disarmed and proceeded to disarm it.

We asked that all of the armed corps be moved up to the front lines because men and weapons are in short supply there, while in the city, under the present state of affairs, their presence was more of a provocation than a necessity. We have been halfway successful on this count and we shall press on until our objective has been completely achieved.

Finally we asked for the destruction of all the documents that represented a whole past era of tyranny and oppression against which our free consciences had revolted. Let us destroy the records and give consideration to requisitioning those buildings that, like the court buildings, have been used in other times to entomb revolutionaries in prisons and have no raison d’être today, now that we find ourselves at the dawning of a libertarian society.

Such objectives brought us into Valencia and this explains all that we did in the manner deemed most appropriate.

Later, during our stay in Valencia, we observed that whereas efforts to acquire weapons foundered due to our lack of funds, there was a huge quantity of gold and other precious metals in many places – this prompted us to requisition the gold, silver and platinum of some jewellers in insignificant quantities which were surrendered to the Organisation. The above is what we have done. Now let us examine what we did not do.

We are accused of looting buildings. This is a lie. We defy anyone to present us with an account of this and to show that our men were not acting out of necessity but from mere caprice and a desire to create confusion. We stand accused of murdering people for amusement. This is a foul calumny. What have we done to deserve this reputation? What crimes have we committed? A deplorable episode, which we are first to lament and to condemn, appears to be the prosecution evidence. We had nothing to do with the death of our socialist comrade José Pardo Aracil. It was shown, on the very night of his death, that no member of our column had any hand in it. It has never occurred to us to attack the socialists nor any other antifascist group, much less to do so in the treacherous fashion in which Pardo was attacked. This does not mean that we renege on our aims, for these are the sole motivations for our fight: we realise, however, that at the present moment, internecine warfare would be a crime. We are facing a formidable enemy and all our exertions must be bent to his destruction. In these crucial times for Spain’s future, our position is clear and unmistakable. We shall fight with all our manpower, all our energies, all our enthusiasm in order to confound the vileness of fascism forever. We struggle to make a reality of the social revolution. Let us march towards Anarchy. Consequently, here and now, we shall stand by everything that makes it possible to live with greater freedom, to smash the yokes that oppress us and to destroy the vestiges of the past.

To every worker, every revolutionary, every anarchist, let us say: struggle, wherever you may be – at the front line or in the rearguard, against all the enemies of your liberty. Strangle the life out of fascism. But see to it also that as a result of your efforts no dictatorial regime is installed, no continuation (with all the vices and defects) of that state of affairs that we are striving to eradicate. With weapons now and with working tools later on, learn to live without tyrants, learn to emancipate yourselves, for this is the only path to freedom. Such, clearly expounded, is the thinking of the ‘Iron Column’.

Comrades! Death to fascism! Long live the social revolution! Long live anarchy!

Posted in Anarchism, Anti-fascism, History | Leave a comment

Good Night Mr.Campbell

Good Night White Pride

You pick on the weak
You’re only strong in groups
Can’t do shit on your own
You pick on those who are few
Right winged scum
You have no place in our scene
Right winged scum
We’ll teach you what skinhead really means

You’re the sickness of our generation
You’ve infested almost every nation
You’re the plague of our society
You’re our most hated enemy

Listen what we have to say: Good night white pride
Only what we have to say: Good night white pride

Good night, good night, good night, good night white pride
Good night, good night, good night, good night white pride

Peter Campbell writes:

Thursday, July 20, 2006

The Asher & @ndy Show

Asher & Andy get all tuff and stuff …

From @ndy’s Blog ‘Slackbastard’:

    Asher Jul 17th, 2006 at 11:50 am

    I have a patch and a badge with that design on them

    @ndy Jul 17th, 2006 at 11:26 pm

    I wonder how the bonehead in question feels about his being immortalised in this fashion? Will other boneheads want to join him? And so set about striking their heads repeatedly against blackfellas’ boots? Stranger things have happened!

Although the subject matter is not funny at all and merely demonstrates yet again how ruthless and violent these Fight Dem Back Criminals really are when they can get away with it, there IS an amusing aspect to this. Anyone who has seen a photograph of Asher Goldman would be distinctly unimpressed with his “tough guy” credentials and probably, like me, genuinely [mistake] him for a very dirty and scruffy girl.

Well, while it may not strike Peter as particularly amusing, it is, at least, ironic.

As previously suggested, I doubt that the bonehead in question was expecting to have his posturing as a representative of a (homocidal) racial supremacy questioned in such a thorough fashion, especially by such a deeply skeptical member of the public. However, for an image of the outcome of their disagreement — presumably, one centred on the subject of the victim’s genuine fitness to constitute, alongside his comrades, a political elite, and to exercise a ruthless and deeply racist form of authoritarian rule over the masses… like, on account of his white skin… to then be used in an anti-fascist propaganda campaign…

Anyway, what’s wrong with scruffy girls?!?

@ndy is another gutless little worm who will do anything to avoid doing his own dirty work. His brother, and anyone else for that matter, will apparently suffice as a “champion” to fight his battles by proxy. Typical jelly backed Lefty tactics really. Darp does precisely the same thing. You can see them now, can’t you? Running over to a bunch of vicious Blacks and pointing out a lone White Nationalist. “Smash the Fash!” they’ll squeal, like the school girls they are.

My own dirty work? But Peter, I wash dishes!

[And what’s this thing you’ve got with “girls”?]

Seriously though: I can only assume that your reference to my “brother” is a result of something Ben Weerheym claimed on his now deleted blog ‘Leftywatch’. To cut a long story short: any and all information regarding my “brother” was provided to Ben by aketus, posing as ‘cricket guy 88’ (or something similar). The story aketus relayed to Ben revolved around my having a non-existent brother, who was described as being both an ex-bikie, an ex-con, and as having a great deal of love for his family. Anyway, the ‘evidence’ for this “brother” was to be based on the non-existent minutes taken at a non-existent meeting of a non-existent group, the ‘Geelong Anarchist Group’… or ‘GAG’ for short.

Get it?

Ben didn’t. Well, not until it was pointed out to him. By aketus.

I assume Ben is yet to inform you of this prank? Was aketus wrong when he wrote that “Everyone on both sides of this game except you knows [Leftywatch is] all made up”? Or are you content to trade on the lies told to you by anti-racists?

In any case, I never threaten individuals with violence. What’s the point? Despite your hero Hitler’s utter contempt for the intellectual capacities of the masses, I believe that most people prefer less, not more, bullshit in their media diet.

As for “vicious blacks”… is there really any other kind, Peter? You, for one, don’t appear to think so. Nor do the racists who belong to Blood & Honour.

A random example from Russia :

But what unites them above all is a hatred of foreigners, in particular of anyone with dark features hailing from the Caucusus region of southern Russia or from Asia or Africa. The views of Semyon Tokmakov, a convicted [bonehead] who brutally attacked a black US Marine in Moscow seven years ago and still espouses [bonehead] rhetoric, is typical. “Why have they [foreigners] all come here?” he told Associated Press. “They bring nothing but drugs and Aids [and] every day they harass and steal our women.”

Nor do [boneheads] make any distinction between children and adults or the young and the old. In St Petersburg, a crucible of [bonehead] activity, a nine-year-old Tajik girl was murdered last year and her case was no exception. Hurshida Sultanova was stabbed to death in front of her father by a group of about 10 [boneheads]. She was knifed 11 times. When asked whether he felt sorry for the murdered Tajik girl, Tokmakov did not bat an eyelid. “When you kill cockroaches you don’t feel sorry for them, do you?”

In recent years, experts say, the [boneheads’] methods have become far more brutal. “They now use screw drivers and knives and increasingly their attacks end in murder,” Sergey Belikov, a specialist in [boneheads], told the weekly Argumenty i fakty publication. “Earlier, there was an unspoken rule to leave children and the old alone. That has been abandoned. The first wave of [boneheads] [in the early 1990s] could be called simple hooligans. Today’s generation are professional killers.”

Another example chosen almost at random, this time from the United States: Jacob D. Robida.

Oh, and is this funny?

IR: Once you had amassed enough evidence to prosecute, how did you arrest your suspects?

GERMAN: These groups tend to revere their martyrs and they talk about martyrdom all the time, about how “if anybody ever tries to arrest me, it’s going to be to the death” and “I’m not going to be taken alive,” that kind of stuff.

So, as we were preparing for the arrest, we tried to create a situation where we could control the environment. Instructional classes were kind of a normal thing for them. This was an activity they were constantly involved in, trying to learn police techniques so that they could combat them. So we decided I would teach them how to pick out of handcuffs with a lock pick set. That way, we would get everyone to put handcuffs on themselves. It worked perfectly. I had a bunch of lock pick sets and I just said, “Hey, this is something I taught myself to do and I can teach you how to do it, too.” So everybody grabbed a set of handcuffs and put them on.

Now go away.

You’re a boring, racist fool.

Posted in Anti-fascism, Music | Leave a comment

‘Accidental definition of an anarchist’

Steve Waldon
The Age
July 20, 2006

NOTEBOOK

“AN ANARCHIST society is a voluntary, non-hierarchical society in which the political and social structures are organised so that all people have free and equal access to the wealth and decision-making power of that society.”

So says the footnote on the invitation from the Anarchist Media Institute, a movement that, if nothing else, confirms this city’s eclecticism.

You probably thought anarchy was all about wilful individualism or collective disruption — about structures deemed necessary for good governance being undermined by noncompliance in the name of personal freedom from busybody authoritarianism. But a small gathering on a city street at lunchtime yesterday heard that anarchy, as portrayed above, is woefully misunderstood.

“In Spain, France and many parts of the world, it is accepted as a legitimate political philosophy,” said Joseph Toscano, spokesman for the Anarchist Media Institute and abundantly productive supplier of material to newspaper letters editors.

As gatherings go, it would be safe to report that Melbourne’s streets have not seen much like it. It was not, Dr Toscano said, a demonstration, nor did it qualify as a rally. It was a simple assembly to mark the 70th anniversary of the Spanish Revolution.

The assembly comprised a dozen doughty citizens, some minor pamphleteering (boo! to the sedition laws, yay! to inalienable human rights), and a couple of banners proclaiming the Eureka Stockade as a definitive study in ordinary folk standing up for their rights against tyrannical authorities.

All this took place in front of a dull Queen Street building from which, in a second floor office, the Spanish tourism bureau dispenses advice to potential visitors.

When Dr Toscano said anarchy was widely misunderstood, he was almost certainly right. In a world awash with big ideas and their believers and detractors, anarchy remains a social and political curiosity.

Not so for millions of Spaniards in 1936, he said. They objected so ardently to a military coup against their democratically elected government, they “raided gun shops and armouries and stopped the military in their tracks”.

Dr Toscano said that was a social revolution that presented anarchism as a genuine alternative to communism and capitalism.

And seven decades later, he said, people still wanted the freedom to organise their lives without overbearing interference from governments, religions and the corporate world.

In 1933, George Bernard Shaw told a New York conference that anarchists were an occasional paradox.

“The ordinary man is an anarchist. He wants to do as he likes. He may want his neighbour to be governed, but he himself doesn’t want to be governed,” Shaw said.

Dr Toscano said anarchy was not about shunning all governance, but adopting a different model in which “the state” was replaced by locally appointed community committees, through which common wealth would be fairly deployed.

Think what you will about anarchy, but its proponents cannot be faulted for punctuality.

The gathering was due to start at 12.30, which it did. It was advertised to last 30 minutes, which it also did.

So passed another Melbourne lunchtime: food for sustenance and food for thought. And just a little sedition on the side.

Posted in Anarchism, History | Leave a comment

Redwatch Poland : It’s Alive!

Not unexpectedly, Redwatch Poland is back. On a new server…

More later.

Bad news for Redwatch UK :

‘MPs in move to close far-right website’
Matthew Taylor
The Guardian
July 20, 2006

A far-right website that lists the addresses of politicians, teachers and trade unionists is facing closure after a series of attacks on anti-racist campaigners.

A delegation of union activists and MPs will meet Home Office ministers today in the wake of the latest incident in which anti-fascist campaigner Alec McFadden, president of Merseyside TUC, whose details are listed on the extremist Redwatch site, was stabbed in the face.

“He was very lucky not to be blinded,” said Angela Eagle, MP for Mr McFadden’s Wallasey constituency, who is heading tomorrow’s delegation. “This happened on his doorstep and in front of his daughter … It is just one of several incidents linked to the website that I have heard about in the past few weeks in the north-west…”

The moral of the story? Stabbing anti-racists is neither big nor clever, and could well get you into trouble with the state.

Posted in Anti-fascism, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | 4 Comments

Many Young Liberals are racist, sexist, homophobic nerds. And proud. Who knew?

I am shocked.

Shocked and stunned.

Collingwood has now lost three matches in a row!

‘Malthouse defends Pies’
The Age
Michael Gleeson
July 17, 2006

“COLLINGWOOD fell from the top four yesterday and faces falling out of the finals altogether after its fourth loss in five games, with coach Michael Malthouse admitting the team deserved to be in its predicament…”

NSW Young Liberals : “Developing Tomorrow’s [Racist, Sexist, Homophobic] Leaders”… Today!

In other news, the entrenched racist, sexist and homophobic attitudes of leading members of the Young Tories have been exposed. Again. This time on Lateline; prompted, perhaps, by the release of video footage of the antics of some young, rather illiberal students at last year’s NUS conference, shot by independent filmmakers Vanessa Hughes and Jessica Tyrrell (a previous example of their work is available here).

In a pre-emptive strike launched early last week, worried Tory Party officials lodged an official complaint with their ABC, alleging “threatening behaviour” and “unethical journalism” on the part of Lateline reporter John Stewart… or possibly Janine Cohen, Four Corners reporter and author of the “The Right Stuff”: “a case study into a political party struggling with democracy”.

Ho ho ho.

But like… whatever. I see no reason to panic. In all fairness to the Tories, there’s little doubt in my mind that the complaint is justified. In informing the Party that they will be exposing racist elements within it, journalists violate the sacred duty of the press: barracking for HoWARd. And declaring one’s intention to do otherwise does indeed threaten vested interests…

Still, if there’s anything worse than the Young Tories it’s Young Labor:

‘Learning the easy way’
Jane Fraser
The Australian
July 18, 2006

MARK Latham, Labor leader manque, and once the scourge of private schooling, has endorsed a book on backroom politics written by former Cranbrook pupil John Hyde Page, a Young Liberal turned law student, to be published next week. “John Hyde Page has made a very important statement about the corrosive impact of machine politics on young people in this country.

The Young Liberals are horrendous and, if anything, Young Labor is worse,” Latham says. How does Page feel about the recommendation? “The politics he depicted in his book, The Latham Diaries, are those with which I became familiar, so I very much value his endorsement.” Page hopes the old truism that books about the Liberal Party don’t sell is turned on its head, and that The Education of a Young Liberal entertains with its account of the inside machinations of a political party.

To be continued…

Posted in Collingwood, State / Politics, Student movement | 10 Comments