It’s Official: ‘Chicks in Bikinis’ prefer Beaches to Mosques

In a stunning display of common sense, Australian women have said ‘no’ to inflammatory political stunts, and ‘yes’ to having a good time… at the beach! On a stinking hot weekend, on the coastlines of the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Who woulda thunk it? Not local fascists; they were praying to Odin for 1,000s of pissed and pissed-off locals to descend on beaches… and mosques… in bikinis.

This weekend — the first anniversary of the Cronulla anti-Muslim / anti-Arab pogrom — was an opportunity for the far right, especially in the misshapen form of the Australia First Party, to publicly flex its puny muscles. Today, Sunday December 10, about ten of the racist losers made it down to Cronulla. Yesterday, in Brunswick, was the original date given for ‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ — officially cancelled by organisers on December 5, and possibly delayed until Invasion Day 2007.

But suppose they gave a date… and nobody came?

Well, that’s exactly what happened. Nobody — literally nobody — was stupid enough to gather at Clifton Park on Saturday, while just around the corner, the community BBQ organised by members of a local mosque went off without a hitch, and attracted several hundred people, despite being extremely hot and smoky weather.

In Sydney, fascist hopes of a second ‘uprising’ were dashed by a strong police presence and the not-unexpected revelation that locals were more interested in splashing about in the surf than they were in embarking on another racist pogrom:

One year on from Cronulla ‘all is quiet’
The Age [AAP]
December 10, 2006

A pleasant summer’s day is all that is happening at Cronulla beach on Sunday, 12 months after a racially-fuelled riot tore through the southern Sydney suburb.

Police have stepped up patrols at southern and eastern beaches this weekend.

All reports from Cronulla indicated it was quiet, NSW Police Minister John Watkins said, and there would be no repeat of the December 11 troubles.

“The deputy commissioner said the only people running amok at Cronulla were the little nippers running into the water, and that’s exactly as it should be,” the Minister told reporters in Sydney.

“Cronulla is a beautiful beach, an icon of the Australian summer, and that’s how we want and expect it to remain through today and the rest of the summer…”

In summary, a good weekend for bushfires, BBQs, and a day at the beach; a bad one for racist losers. Speaking of which, special thanks to Ben Weerheym for his sterling efforts at sabotaging the organising efforts of local bigots. Apparently, if you want to blame anyone for screwing the March up, blame him.

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, Sex & Sexuality, War on Terror | 40 Comments

Good riddance to MORE bad rubbish

[Update : see also Bill van Auken, Jeane Kirkpatrick: from “social democrat” to champion of death squads, WSWS, December 12, 2006 | Waving of beret: Michael Berrell]

First Milton Friedman, now Jeane Kirkpatrick : 1926 — 2006.

The crucifixion of El Salvador : Noam Chomsky, What Uncle Sam Really Wants, 1993

For many years, repression, torture and murder were carried on in El Salvador by dictators installed and supported by our government, a matter of no interest here. The story was virtually never covered. By the late 1970s, however, the US government began to be concerned about a couple of things.

One was that Somoza, the dictator of Nicaragua, was losing control. The US was losing a major base for its exercise of force in the region. A second danger was even more threatening. In El Salvador in the 1970s, there was a growth of what were called “popular organizations” — peasant associations, cooperatives, unions, Church-based Bible study groups that evolved into self-help groups, etc. That raised the threat of democracy.

In February 1980, the Archbishop of El Salvador, Óscar Romero, sent a letter to President Carter in which he begged him not to send military aid to the junta that ran the country. He said such aid would be used to “sharpen injustice and repression against the people’s organizations” which were struggling “for respect for their most basic human rights” (hardly news to Washington, needless to say).

A few weeks later, Archbishop Romero was assassinated while saying a mass. The neo-Nazi Roberto d’Aubuisson [1944 — 1992] is generally assumed to be responsible for this assassination (among countless other atrocities). D’Aubuisson was “leader-for-life” of the ARENA party, which now [1993] governs El Salvador; members of the party, like current [1989 — 1994] Salvadoran president Alfredo Cristiani, had to take a blood oath of loyalty to him.

    “When the church hears the cry of the oppressed it cannot but denounce the social structures that give rise to and perpetuate the misery from which the cry arises.” — Óscar Romero

Thousands of peasants and urban poor took part in a commemorative mass a decade later, along with many foreign bishops, but the US was notable by its absence. The Salvadoran Church formally proposed Romero for sainthood.

All of this passed with scarcely a mention in the country that funded and trained Romero’s assassins. The New York Times, the “newspaper of record,” published no editorial on the assassination when it occurred or in the years that followed, and no editorial or news report on the commemoration.

On March 7, 1980, two weeks before the assassination, a state of siege had been instituted in El Salvador, and the war against the population began in force (with continued US support and involvement). The first major attack was a big massacre at the Rio Sumpul, a coordinated military operation of the Honduran and Salvadoran armies in which at least 600 people were butchered. Infants were cut to pieces with machetes, and women were tortured and drowned. Pieces of bodies were found in the river for days afterwards. There were church observers, so the information came out immediately, but the mainstream US media didn’t think it was worth reporting.

Peasants were the main victims of this war, along with labor organizers, students, priests or anyone suspected of working for the interests of the people. In Carter’s last year, 1980, the death toll reached about 10,000, rising to about 13,000 for 1981 as the Reaganites took command.

In October 1980, the new archbishop condemned the “war of extermination and genocide against a defenseless civilian population” waged by the security forces. Two months later they were hailed for their “valiant service alongside the people against subversion” by the favorite US “moderate,” José Napoleón Duarte, as he was appointed civilian president of the junta.

The role of the “moderate” Duarte was to provide a fig leaf for the military rulers and ensure them a continuing flow of US funding after the armed forces had raped and murdered four churchwomen from the US. That had aroused some protest here; slaughtering Salvadorans is one thing, but raping and killing American nuns is a definite PR mistake. The media evaded and downplayed the story, following the lead of the Carter Administration and its investigative commission.

The incoming Reaganites went much further, seeking to justify the atrocity, notably Secretary of State Alexander Haig and UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick. But it was still deemed worthwhile to have a show trial a few years later, while exculpating the murderous junta — and, of course, the paymaster…

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, History, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

G20: Fifth arrest over G20 “riots”

NEWS.com.au
December 8, 2006

A FIFTH person was arrested tonight over the protest outside the G20 summit in Melbourne last month.

Danya Bryx, of Caulfield North, was remanded to appear in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday.

Bryx, 22, appeared at an out-of-sessions hearing at Victoria Police tonight, facing charges of riot, affray and conduct endangering persons.

Police have charged four other people involved in the violent riots.

The protests occurred on November 18 in streets surrounding the city’s Grand Hyatt Hotel, which was hosting the summit of finance leaders from 19 countries plus the European Union.

Other protesters facing charges over the riots include… Aki[n] Sari, David Vakalis, Rosalie Delaney and Dominic Richardson.

Posted in State / Politics | 1 Comment

Jack Thomas and A Paranoid State

This week, while the Crown argues for a re-trial, Jack Thomas‘ defence lawyers argue for the lifting of the ‘control order’ the Government — in the person of the Attorney-General, Montgomery Burns — has placed on him. According to Thomas’ lawyers, “the law allowing the control order is invalid because it gives a federal court a non-judicial power that is contrary to the Constitution”. Thomas is the first person in Australia to be subjected to such an order, which places the following restrictions on his activity:

    * He must abide by a curfew, confining him to his home from midnight until 5am each morning;
    * He is restricted in the phone services he is allowed to operate (one mobile phone, one land line) and must have these approved by the Australian Federal Police. He is prohibited from using public pay phones;
    * He is required to seek written approval to make telephone calls;
    * He is not to communicate with a list of persons identified as terrorists including Osama bin Laden [!], Ayman al-Zawahiri [!] and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi [RIP!];
    * He must agree to be fingerprinted.
    * He must not leave Australia.

Having been adjourned, the case appealing the control order on the grounds on un-Constitutionality is expected to resume some time in February, 2007.

Interestingly, in responding to the case, Justice Callinan remarked:

“These circumstances are absolutely unique. I know in history of no other situation in which nationals living within their own national community, actually set out clandestinely to destroy people in the community … It’s a unique combination of circumstances … because it crosses international borders. That is what makes it unique. I mean, you can’t identify the enemy.”

Justice Kern agrees: “It’s coming right for us!”

Posted in !nataS, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

The Great Australian Bikini March… Again!

‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ meme has legs, and it knows how to use them.

Even when cancelled.

In the upside-down world of (US) right-wing blogging, even Michelle Malkin has got in on the act. Knowing nothing about Australia (“are not all Australians good American material?”), and caring less, Malkin fails to mention the fact that the March was scheduled to take place on the first anniversary of the Cronulla riots. A small but, like, crucial detail.

Ain’t (pretended) ignorance grand?

In other news:

Bikini march sparks retort
Mark Dunn
Herald Sun
December 7, 2006

MUSLIMS, socialists, unions and other groups will conduct a counter-rally against bikini protesters who plan [?] to march on a Brunswick mosque on Saturday.

Police will monitor the demonstrations, with white supremacists claiming to have infiltrated bikini protest ranks, increasing the potential for confrontation.

Organisers of the “Great Australian Bikini March” had planned to march against the Michael St mosque last [sic] Saturday, anniversary of the Cronulla riots in NSW.

Though the bikini march has been postponed until Australia Day next year, some supporters say they will still hold the rally on Saturday.

The march has been promoted on white supremacist websites.

In response, the Islamic Information and Support Centre and the Socialist Party Australia are organising a barbecue and mosque open day for Saturday at the same time [1pm].

The so-called bikini march, criticised as being insensitive, was designed as a reaction to mufti Sheik Taj el-Din el-Hilaly’s comments on scantily clad women being the cause of some rapes.

Sheik Mohammed Omran, who heads the Brunswick mosque, later defended the mufti.

A mosque spokesman said the theme of their meeting and sausage sizzle was uniting Australia.

BYO vege-sausages!

Posted in !nataS, Media | 11 Comments

G20: Three G20 protesters granted bail

Three G20 protesters granted bail
Sasha Shtargot and Andrea Petrie
The Age
December 7, 2006

THREE demonstrators accused of violence at the G20 city protests last month were granted bail last night.

Students Rosalie Delaney, 19, of Parkville, and David Vakalis, 19, of Brunswick East, and Dominic Richardson, 24, a part-time sales assistant from Brunswick, were charged with offences, including riot and affray. Vakalis was also charged with conduct endangering persons.

A bail hearing at the Melbourne Magistrates Court was told that Richardson pushed a wheelie bin against a police barricade in Collins Street during the November 18 protest in an attempt to breach it. At the same time, others threw bottles, bread and milk crates.

The court was told that Delaney, a Melbourne University student, threw a wheelie bin at a police brawler van on the corner of Exhibition Street and Flinders Lane, damaging a window.

Magistrate Dan Muling granted bail with conditions to the pair and ordered them to face court on March 22.

Vakalis faced an out-of-sessions hearing at the St Kilda Road police complex last night. The hearing was told that he threw wheelie bins, street signs and milk crates at police vehicles. A call to Crime Stoppers put police in touch with his university. Police raided his house yesterday and charged him with eight offences. He was bailed to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates Court today.

See also : ‘Blood and politics in the street’, Nick Coe, The Bulletin, November 20: “There were warnings this gathering of global money-men could spark trouble. Protest organisers rightly pointed out that they could not control the behaviour of every individual. But at the very least, their demonstration allowed radical groups an opportunity to infiltrate, and autonomously plot their mayhem.”

On riot and affray: five years ago, in June 2001, a number of workers, including former AMWU state secretary Craig Johnston, engaged in a so-called ‘run-through’ of two businesses (Johnson Tiles and Skilled Engineering) involved in a protracted industrial dispute. The case eventually boiled down to the ‘Skilled Six’. On August 27, 2004, the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal decided to jail Johnston: “In a surprise move, three appeal court judges overturned an earlier suspended jail sentence handed down by Judge Joe Gullaci in the Melbourne County Court, and imprisoned Johnston for nine months…

Significantly, Johnston is the first union official to be jailed since the 1983 three-month incarceration of Builders Labourers Federation (BLF) national secretary Norm Gallagher on long-standing contempt charges. Gallagher’s jailing paved the way for the eventual federal deregistration and smashing of the BLF in 1986—part of the Hawke government’s agenda of disciplining militant sections of workers as a precondition for its assault on the social position of the working class as a whole. In May, Johnston received a one-year suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty to charges of affray, criminal damage and verbal assault in exchange for the dropping of a “threat to kill” charge that carried a maximum penalty of 25 years jail.

Johnston was eventually released on May 27, 2005, while the sixteen other workers who also faced charges over their involvement in the initial incidents “were convicted and fined up to $3000 over the invasions after pleading guilty to unlawful assembly”.

That’s history. Now law:

    Riot

    Riot is a common law offence based on the concept of “breach of the peace”. The prosecution must prove that three or more people were gathered together, with a common purpose, with an intent to assist each other, using force if necessary, against anyone who opposed them, and also used or threatened force or violence in such a manner as to terrify reasonable people.

    Police may also have a situation declared as a riot by having a magistrate read aloud the riot proclamation (“reading the riot act”).

    Affray

    Affray is also a common law offence. The prosecution must prove that there was fighting or violence used by one or more people against another or other people, or an unlawful display of force, and this might cause a reasonable bystander to be terrified.

Buggered if I can find the relevant legislation online but…

Posted in State / Politics, Student movement | 3 Comments

G20: Two more arrests

    Above : Police outside Parliament House, November 18, 2006. As has become standard practice at public protests since S11 (2000), none wear ID so as to better avoid identification by the public. A nominal requirement of Victoria Police Operating Instructions — members “Must wear Force issue nametags with their first name or initial(s), surname and rank displayed on their right chest at all times” — it is, with the knowledge and consent of their superiors, routinely and systematically ignored by police members. The reason for this is not obscure: to make it extremely difficult for members of the public to pursue civil litigation against them

Riot charges over G20 protests
John Silvester
The Age
December 6, 2006

Detectives have arrested two people allegedly connected with violent attacks on police during last month’s G20 demonstrations in Melbourne.

Rosalie Delaney and Dominic Richardson have been charged with riot, affray and various other charges relating to the G20 demonstrations.

Delaney is a 19-year-old woman from Parkville who was also charged with criminal damage.

Richardson is a 24-year-old man from Brunswick who is also charged with conduct endangering person.

The pair were questioned by detectives from Taskforce Salver which was set up to try and identify the protesters who attacked police and damaged a police brawler van.

The taskforce of 20 detectives have used photos and media footage to help trace the demonstrators involved in the November 18 violence near the Grand Hyatt.

More than 10 police were injured, including one who suffered a broken wrist and others who were treated for bite wounds.

An officer who suffered bite wounds faces a three-month wait to learn if he has contracted hepatitis or HIV.

Today’s Herald Sun contains a similar report, but importantly assumes guilt on the part of those arrested, as does Murdoch’s other franchise, Sky News Australia.

Posted in Media, State / Politics | Leave a comment

The Great Australian Bikini March : Unplugged, Undressed & Cancelled

    One of the great attractions of patriotism — it fulfills our worst wishes. In the person of our nation we are able, vicariously, to bully and cheat. Bully and cheat, what’s more, with a feeling that we are profoundly virtuous. — Aldous Huxley

Christine Hawkins and Chris Gemmell-Smith, organisers of ‘The Great Australian Bikini March’, have updated their site with the following announcement, dated December 5:

Breaking News — Bikini March Becomes Bikini Atoll

Organisers of The Great Australian Bikini March have been forced to cancel the event due to irresponsible journalism.

During the month of the campaign, most media were respectful, reported the facts, focused on the issue[,] and agreed that publishing personal details about organisers was unnecessary.

However, during the last few days there [has] been a… smear campaign in an attempt to sensationalise or discredit us. Despite… all [our] efforts to refer misinformed journalists and ‘independent’ media to the facts via our website they continued to knowingly misrepresent the intention and details of the March. Some stated they wanted us to stop the March.

Apparently some in the media are intent that [‘The Great Australian Bikini March’] should not be allowed to proceed.

Some people are very powerful. It would appear that free speech in a ‘tolerant’ society is not tolerated.

The level of hostility against us even included [reached the level of?] verbal abuse and threats to publish our personal details. This culminated in one media outlet doing so and [thereby] placing a family at risk.

[‘The Great Australian Bikini March’] organisers reiterate that the response from the general public was overwhelmingly supportive. Aussies from all backgrounds[,] including many migrants from many different countries[,] expressed support for the views expressed [on] our website. [Some] migrants stated that they had left countries because of extremism and did not want to see it get a foothold in Australia. They feared to express… their views alone and welcomed the chance to unite to do so.

Even the one Muslim that disagreed with the March… stated that he was against [Hilali’s] statements. He did so politely and respectfully and was answered in a like fashion [by] the organisers. We only wish the media had acted [similarly].

Immediately after one ‘shock jock’ misrepresented and defamed us, his news desk followed with a statement that we were marching against the hijab. Some Muslim people were confused… and distressed by this misinformation and we received about 4 phone calls [as a result]. One of these [callers] was very emotionally volatile. We had to then inform them that this [was] not our intent[,] but the damage had already been done.

What was to have been a peaceful, moderate, legal, non-violent, council- and police-approved protest has now been gagged by threats and extreme intimidatory tactics.

A big thank you to the members of the Victoria Police and Council staff who were respectful and professional and responded well to our offers to fully co-operate… with them.

[‘The Great Australian Bikini March’] organisers have been informed that we have now [been] credited in the media with a supposed march at Lakemba this weekend [December 9/10, 2006]. In spite of numerous conversations with Sydney print media last week [stating] that we had nothing to do with any event in Sydney, it appears that they went ahead and published it anyway.

What do our supporters do now?

We are as disappointed as you are at having to make the decision to cancel the March but when [family’s] lives are placed at risk, there is no alternative.

We would encourage you to keep your protests legal, non-violent and avail yourself of all democratic avenues.

    * Make this an election issue.
    * Contact your local Members of Parliament. Contact Telstra for State Liberal or Labor Party Headquarters’ phone number. Ask them for your local representative in Federal Parliament.
    * Hold rogue media accountable for their actions through letters to the newspapers.
    * Keep caring about what happens to your country.

Ben Weerheym’s Bikini Line

I first became aware of ‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ via the blog of Perth-based convicted neo-Nazi criminal Ben Weerheym, and my first blog entry on the subject is dated November 14. (Ben Weerheym’s promotion of the event had commenced on the previous day, November 13.) His blog entry on the subject, titled ‘Bikini Babes, No Hijabs – Saturday Dec 9, 2006’, named Hawkins and Smith as the organisers, and included their mobile telephone numbers as contacts for the March. At the time, quoting the organisers (from the first of two websites dedicated to promoting the event — the first created on November 7, then closed on November 21; the second created on November 22), Weerheym wrote:

Following recent comments by the top Muslim cleric in Australia, mufti Sheik al-Hilali and Melbourne’s Sheik Omran, outraged Australian women and their male supporters will reassert Australian values by taking to the streets in a bikini march on their [m]osques on Saturday [December] 9, 2006.

Colourful beach wear is the suggested clothing [for] the day, in keeping with [our] message. Bikinis are encouraged[,] but any swimwear, summer skirts, tops [and] shorts or sarongs are also appropriate. The use of any clothing or banners bearing the Australian flag is highly recommended.

This event is proudly sponsored by True Blue Productions — a 100% Aussie-owned venture.

Subsequent investigation revealed that True Blue was owned by the “100% Aussie”, Chris Gemmell-Smith.

A subsequent blog entry by Weerheym, dated November 20, included a disclaimer, distancing himself from the organisers… and the organisers from him (at their apparent insistence). It also revealed further details of the March, including a time, an assembly point — Clifton Park — and a destination — the Islamic Information and Support Centre (the site of this Saturday’s community BBQ ‘against racism and sexual assault’).

Commenting on his blog, Hawkins complained that Weerheym was ‘hijacking’ the March. Weerheym responded by stating that he was ‘only trying to help get her message out there’: ‘out there’ meaning way out there. In fact, Weerheym took the opportunity to spam neo-Nazi sites such as Stormfront and neo-Nazi organisations such as the (US-based) National Alliance to promote the March.

Notwithstanding his own criminal record in the service of neo-Nazism, given the forums in which Weerheym chose to promote the event (“in conjunction” with his imaginary friends in his non-existent ‘Alliance’), Hawkins’ reaction is not surprising. For example, in response to Weerheym’s ‘promotional activity’, one pseudonymous Stormfront user (‘Ben Hall’) wrote: “Australian women should feel able to walk the streets of our nation without the fear of being assaulted or raped by some knuckle-dragging raghead or… mudman”. Another, Carl D. Thompson (‘Wodensvolk’), describes Muslims simply as ‘scum’. Weerheym also stated, in response to Hawkins’ expressing concern over his promotion of the event, that “If multi-culturalists and red traitors think that [the March] is “racist” then that’s their problem, we call a spade a spade and don’t artfully dodge the REAL issues at hand like the [Jewish-]controlled media does”.

Weerheym’s hatred for and suspicion of the ‘Jewish-controlled media’ appears to date from his membership of the neo-Nazi White Devils gang, and his subsequent criminal conviction, along with four of his fellow gang members, for a series of racially-motivated crimes in 2004: crimes including the spraying of a swastika on the entrance to a war widows’ retirement village in suburban Perth.

While each of his neo-Nazi comrades received custodial sentences, Weerheym received a suspended sentence, and it was shortly thereafter that he began his career as a net-Nazi; an occupation which has been keeping him busy ever since, Weerheym regularly vilifying not only Muslims and Jews, but Asians, blacks (“Negroes”), gays (“faggots”), lesbians, and all the other, usual targets of the far right’s ire. Weerheym was fortunate not to be sent to jail for his part in the vandalism of Chinese restaurants, synagogues, and the like, his non-custodial sentence partly a result of his lesser role in the gang’s vandalism spree, but also attributable to the successful denial of his membership in the ANM.

An article by Paige Taylor (The Australian, August 7, 2004) provides a useful recapitulation of this history:

A student who avoided jail over Perth’s latest race-hate crimes concealed his involvement with a terrorist group and is a white supremacist who has urged violence against Asians.

The state Director of Public Prosecutions will consider appealing the suspended jail sentence given to Benjamin Weerheym, 27, on Thursday in light of information from The Weekend Australian about his involvement with the Australian Nationalists Movement.

Weerheym, an IT student and part-time disc-jockey from the southern suburb of Como, admitted he was the driver for his two co-accused in the July 16 and 17 [2004] graffiti attacks.

Before he was sentenced to a six-month suspended sentence this week, Weerheym’s lawyer, Michael Tudori, told the Perth Magistrates Court Weerheym was not interested in the ANM and had not wanted to take part in the graffiti.

However The Weekend Australian has learned that for almost two years Weerheym has been promoting the ANM and urging violent attacks against ethnic groups on a white supremacist website called Stormfront.org.

Under the pseudonym Thor Hammered, Weerheym has posted more than 800 messages, ranting against Asians, Jews and Muslims. He has urged others to blow up a Perth nightclub owned by Asians.

“The more the white youth of Australia stand up and show them their true feelings towards the invaders THE BETTER!!” he wrote in March [2003].

Weerheym also wrote: “After a recent trip east by the key members of the ANM/ANWU [Australian Nationalist Workers Union], it has become apparent we are the most effective, organised, active and above all premier nationalist/pro-white organisation in Australia.”

When Weerheym was confronted about his pseudonym — which was tracked to his email address and his telephone number — he refused to answer any questions about it or his involvement with the ANM.

He instead issued an apology [sic] for his involvement in the graffiti attacks.

“I take seriously my political and social ideals but the methods of expression that were undertaken were most definitely not positive or a viable option,” he said.

DPP Robert Cock said Weerheym may have misled the court.

“If we establish that he had misled the court in his submission we would be very enthusiastic to get the matter back before the court to be corrected,” he said…

Weerheym was not jailed because he was deemed to have played a much lesser role as the driver.

The ANM campaign has been escalating since three restaurants were firebombed in February.

Police uncovered an ANM plot to harm West Australian attorney general Jim McGinty last month while investigating the racist graffiti attacks.

Ethnic Communities Council president Suresh Rajan said Weerheym’s sentence was woefully inadequate, especially because it appeared he acted with intent.

“I don’t think I’ve seen such hate being expressed by people in quite a long time, it is really quite frightening,” he said.

In the event, the DPP did not launch an appeal. The following year, 2006, it also declined to prosecute Weerheym for racial vilification, instead opting to unsuccessfully target an Aboriginal teenager for the same alleged crime.

With friends like Weerheym, who needs enemies?

Posted in !nataS, Sex & Sexuality, State / Politics | 32 Comments

‘Not MY Grandma’ : Community BBQ, Saturday, December 9

    Hat tip : Shane

In response to ‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ the Islamic Information and Support Centre has called for a community BBQ and mosque open day against racism and sexual assault from 1pm on Saturday, December 9, at 19 Michael Street, Brunswick.

‘she’s not my grandma: aussie values, racism and sexual assault

‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ was called as a protest against recent comments by the Sydney-based Sheik Hilaly regarding sexual assault. It was planned for Saturday December 9, the anniversary of the Cronulla riots. The official spokesperson for the march describes herself as a veteran bikini-wearing grandma. The key demands of the march are for the deportation of Sheik Hilaly, and also of Keysar Trad (Hilaly’s spokesman), and Melbourne’s Sheik Omran. As well, they are calling for ‘urgent citizenship legislation’ to ‘weed out extremists.’

The march was to start at Clifton Park in Brunswick and end at the Islamic Information and Support Centre, which is headed by Sheik Omran, on Michael Street. According to the organisers, the march has been postponed to ‘Australia Day’ (January 26) in the city. White supremacist groups are still calling for people to march on December 9 regardless.

In language reminiscent of the Cronulla riots, the group has been calling on ‘average Australians’ to show up to demonstrate their support for women’s safety, which, they argue, is under threat from ‘extremist Muslim attitudes’ towards women and sexual assault. They say “We must now stand together on this issue, regardless of what other issues we might have, to ensure Australia’s wives, mothers, daughters and sisters feel safe in their own country.”

The march’s organisers are attempting to perpetuate the myth that sexual violence is imported into Australia by Muslims and other ‘foreigners’. Islamophobic portrayals of Muslim men as threats to the ‘nation’ and rapists of white women makes sexual violence within ‘Australian’ society invisible. In particular, it denies and excuses the sexual and gendered violence endured by Muslim women at the hands of white men. The depressing reality is that rape is endemic to Australian society, and most rapes are perpetrated by family, friends and acquaintances. Even more depressing is the widespread denial and indifference that is the overwhelming response of ‘Australians’ to this epidemic. In the last ten years state and federal governments have massively defunded sexual assault services and education programs.

Sexual assault is often made the butt of jokes or even defended in public ‘Aussie’ culture. Prominent representatives of Australian society have often made particularly revealing comments about social attitudes to sexual assault.

Some comments you may not have heard:

    “Some of the boys love a ‘bun’. Gang banging is nothing new for our club or the rugby league.”

    — A Canterbury Bulldogs player commenting on gang rape allegations made against team members

    “Our domestic violence policy could be called ‘the things that batter’.”

    — Then Liberal Party Leader Alexander Downer‘s version of humour while promoting the Liberal Party‘s The Things That Matter campaign

    “My belief is that this was not sex abuse. There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that. Quite the contrary, my information is that it was, rather, the other way around.”

    Peter Hollingworth, then Australian Governor-General, commenting on the case of a priest who had sexually abused a fourteen year old girl. The Governor-General felt it was appropriate to suggest that the teenage girl was the more likely sexual predator [See also : Governor-General: Fit to Govern?, Sunday, February 17, 2002; following a public outcry, over a year later, Hollingworth resigned on May 28, 2003]

    “If every man stopped the first time a woman said ‘No’, the world would be a much less exciting place to live.”

    — [New Zealand] High Court Judge Morris in 1996 rape case [See also : Myths and Realities of Sexual Violence, NSW Rape Crisis Centre; Judicial vision : rape, prostitution and the ‘chaste woman’, Jocelyn Scutt (PDF)]

To date none of these men have been deported.

The controversy around Hilaly’s comments regarding sexual assault have been used as a justification by the group. However, their demands have nothing to do with preventing sexual violence, or challenging its causes. For instance: through education programs, or the restoration of the funding slashed for sexual assault support services. Rather, the appeal to a defence of ‘Australian values’ is about intensifying the persecution of Muslims and glorifying a ‘beach culture’ which is deeply misogynistic and racist.

This statement was produced by ‘Not my Grandma’ and is not affiliated to the Islamic Information and Support Centre.

Please also note :

Civil Rights Defence is holding a rally as part of an International Day of Action to call for the immediate release of David Hicks and his repatriation to Australia. The rally will take place at Federation Square on December 9 at 2pm. The event is held in co-operation with Amnesty International and Liberty Victoria.

David Hicks has now spent five years interned in the US concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay. During this time he has been held in solitary confinement for months on end, been interrogated countless times, suffered various forms of torture and sensory deprivation, and has been denied the fundamental right to a fair trial. The Australian government is entirely complicit in this human rights violation. John Howard, Philip Ruddock and Alexander Downer have refused to call for Hicks to be released, instead going along with the Bush administration’s phoney military commissions, which violate the Geneva Conventions and which are condemned by the Red Cross, Amnesty International, and the British government among many others.

Come along on the 9th and show the government that torture is unacceptable and that David Hicks must be released now.

Posted in Anti-fascism, Sex & Sexuality, State / Politics | 14 Comments

Race hate and the state

‘Polish race hate groups spark concern’ according to Dr Krystyna Bleszynska of Warsaw University, addressing a race relations conference in the UK, as Polish neo-Nazis and assorted other fascist scum reportedly ‘forge links’ with their comrades in the UK.

Duh.

The BBC news report (November 29) refers to the alleged closure of a neo-Nazi website — Redwatch Poland — and the arrest of one man in connection to its operation. In reality, the site was closed twice: first by ISP DreamHost, then another; first in July, then again in August. Needless to say — well, unless you’re a well-paid ‘expert’ on ‘race relations’, of course — it’s back up, on another server. Further, like Redwatch Poland, Redwatch UK continues on its merry way, as does Redwatch New Zealand. Both authorities in the UK (2004; June 2006) and New Zealand / Aotearoa (August 2006) have declared their intention to ‘investigate’ the websites in question.

Not unexpectedly, both have been found to be full of piss-and-wind; just like the neo-Nazis, really… and notwithstanding the fact that, for example, on Redwatch New Zealand, bonehead Nic Miller even stooped so low as to post the address and photo of the home of a Holocaust survivor (among many others, especially Jews and/or antifa); with the full and knowing co-operation of Google, natch.

According to the BBC report:

[Redwatch Poland] published details [photographs, names, addresses, descriptions, occupations] of people on its hate list — such as left-wing activists, homosexuals and members of ethnic minorities… [and] was [sic] operated by the Polish wing of Blood and Honour, an international group which originated in the UK. The site used a US-based server.

In Australia, convicted neo-Nazi criminal Ben Weerheym — whose most recent foray into the exciting world of fascist activism has been ‘The Great Australian Bikini March’ — was threatened with prosecution under useless ‘Racial Vilification’ legislation by WA authorities in March, 2006. But no: instead, WA authorities decided to test the untried law — introduced following, and in explicit reference to, the racist campaign by Weerheym’s former leader Jack van Tongeren and his neo-Nazi Australian Nationalists Movement — by prosecuting an Aboriginal teenagerunsuccessfully.

Also in Australia, Blood & Honour Australia, in conjunction with another bonehead gang, the Southern Cross Hammerskins, held a gig in September at The Birmingham Hotel in Fitzroy (Cnr. Johnston & Smith Streets | (03) 9417 2706 — ask for Gary) in order to commemorate the death of B&H founder Ian Stuart Donaldson. On the night of the gig, a local woman was accosted by seven boneheads, who insisted on her calling herself a ‘black cunt’ before allowing her to leave their charming — and incredibly brave — company. In the meantime, scabs continue to drink and play at the fascist venue (although it should be noted that some have complained of harassment — sadly, Fitzroy can be a hazardous area at times, especially if one frequents The Birmy).

As for Poland, the authorities were only compelled to act following the stabbing by boneheads of a Jewish anarchist profiled on the site, and, further — and crucially — an assault upon Poland’s Chief Rabbi, Michael Schudrich. Of course, in Russia, boneheads and other scum are able to operate with impunity, and with the full blessing of Vladimir Putin‘s corrupt regime. Thus, a report by a human rights group in September stated that:

So far this year, [at least] 33 people have died and about 300 have been injured as a result of racially motivated attacks, as opposed to last year’s total of 35 people killed and 393 injured… This year’s racially motivated attacks, mostly carried out by [boneheads], have been reported in 32 out [of] Russia’s 89 regions.

The antifa opposition in Russia — as elsewhere, spearheaded by anarchists — are also subjected to violent assault and murder. Meanwhile, in the corporate/state media, anarchists are routinely referred to as ‘terrorists’, and boneheads referred to as ‘skinheads’.

As Spinal Tap sang: The more it stays the same, the less it changes.

Australian state/corporate media coverage of the above issues is available via the links below:

Posted in Anarchism, Anti-fascism, History, Media, State / Politics | 3 Comments