Heinemann & Freehills : Industrial Relations, South African style

Praise boss when morning work-bells chime.
Praise him for bits of overtime.
Praise him whose wars we love to fight.
Praise him, fat leech and parasite.

‘All work and no pay may be immoral but it’s legal, company says’
Dan Silkstone
The Age
September 8, 2006

THEY worked all week and will be paid nothing. Their union says it is unprecedented, the workers say it is immoral. But under Australia’s workplace laws it appears to be legal.

Mulgrave company Heinemann Electrics is refusing to pay 54 workers for five days of work last month because they placed a ban on working overtime during that period as part of an industrial campaign for a new enterprise bargaining agreement.

Despite working 38 hours between August 22 and August 28, all of the workers have been told they will not be paid because of a decade-old provision in Australian workplace law that, the company says, prohibits employers from paying workers during industrial action.

Before taking the action, Heinemann received legal advice from Freehills — a key architect of the HoWARd Government’s new industrial relations legislation. Heinemann said yesterday it had no choice but to refuse to pay or it would be in breach of the Workplace Relations Act.

But ACTU President Sharan Burrow said the action was a “monstrous interpretation” of the law. “These men have worked for five days for no pay,” she said. “Does the Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews think that this is fair?”

[Is that a rhetorical question Sharan?]

A similar question was put to Prime Minister John HoWARd in question time yesterday by the Opposition [sic]. “If you work for 40 hours and there are no countervailing circumstances, of course you should get paid,” he said.

Partial work bans have long been used as a moderate tactic in disputes. But Electrical Trades Union secretary Dean Mighell said the company’s action would have a big effect on union tactics.

He said the new interpretation would leave workers no alternative but to stop work entirely, a move the Mulgrave workers took yesterday. “Total warfare or nothing,” he said. “That’s where Australian industrial relations is now at, tragically.”

The workers’ overtime ban had been approved by the Industrial Relations Commission and was considered a legal action under the WorkChoices legislation. Overtime was not compulsory at the factory.

Heinemann general manager Richard Ross said the company had acted appropriately: “We had to look at it and apply the law in the correct way,” he said. “That’s what we did, it’s nothing more than that.” Asked if it was immoral to accept workers’ labour and refuse to pay for it, he said: “Is there a moral requirement for me to break the law?”

Mr Andrews said the matter would be investigated by the Office of Workplace Services to see if the company had acted properly. The dispute relates to a new enterprise bargaining agreement, under which the company wants an arrangement where staff work an average 38-hour week over a month. Workers could be required to work 20 hours one week and 60 the next.

South African company Circuit Breaker Industries took over Heinemann two years ago and has since received repeated warnings from WorkSafe for bullying workers.

Nalin Nawagamuwage has assembled circuit boards at the factory for 13 years and said the new owners had been a nightmare. “They are really arrogant and grumpy … The water cooler is broken so we ask for it to be replaced, they just took it away … Everyone working here has been very stressed.”

Heinemann Electrics sounds like the kinda place that would welcome neo-fucking-Nazis in its ranks!

You pick on the weak
You’re only strong in groups
Can’t do shit on your own
You pick on those who are few
Right winged scum
You have no place in our scene
Right winged scum
We’ll teach you what SOLIDARITY really means

Contact : Heinemann Electrics | Freehills

[See also : Union Solidarity | Zabalaza!]

Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics | 1 Comment

Battle in Seattle // This Revolution

First Rosario Dawson play-acted an ‘anarchist’ (I think) called ‘Tina Santiago’ in This Revolution; now Charlize Theron is slated to play-act — What? A ‘concerned citizen’ or something? Sounds like it — “Lou, a pregnant bystander who loses her child in the melee of protests and regards events with some objectivity” in Battle in Seattle.

What’s next?

Monica Bellucci in Death in Genoa?

(Actually, Belluci will portray Sonia Gandhi in the 2007 biopic Sonia.)

See also : some (other) bloke called Andrew’s reflections on (the excellent) Film and the Anarchist Imagination by Richard Porton; Lizzie Borden’s (criminally neglected) Born in Flames; & V for Vendetta.

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, Film, History, Media, Music, Sex & Sexuality, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Scumfront Brisbane : Comedy Central

Ahhh, Queensland.

Beautiful one month, perfect the next.

While Zionist students worry about the supposedly anti-Semitic antics of Socialist Alternative, Brisbane-based members of Scumfront Down Under have been running into all sorts of trouble simply trying to hold a BBQ.

Last month, the racist wankers managed to arrange for themselves to be denied entry to the Medieval Fayre; this month, their picnicking was interrupted by the presence of — eeek! — Muslims!

Well, that’s what the boneheads on Shitfront reckon.

According to the pseudonymous organiser 3sevens, while up to 20 neo-Nazis gathered in order to eat chops and sausages (and, presumably, to blame ZOG for their poor quality — they’ve only themselves to blame for the poor quality of the conversation!), at some point the scum “were confronted by a large group of muds”, leaving these brave souls “no choice but to pack up [their] gear and leave”.

On the highly amusing Scumfront thread in question, not being content with the description given by 3sevens, Aquila Audax asks “What breed of mud were they?”. “Muslims”, replies Anthonytwunt: a supposition which seems to have struck real fear into the hearts of the racists; this despite the fact that the two groups were apparently of equal number, and despite the fact that the ‘muds’ apparently simply expressed a desire to talk with the assembled racists and fascists (although Godwin knows why they’d bother).

As for their decision to flee, presumably the assembled neo-Nazis were afraid of the consequences of engaging in a full and frank discussion with their fellow citizens: who knows?

In any case, 3sevens justifies the group’s decision to flee on the basis that “we had a female with us” and because he was fearful of other ‘muds’ joining the ‘muds’ already assembled, leaving the scum outnumbered as well as outgunned.

Obviously a thinker, Anthonytwunt reminds readers that this was ‘real life’, not a film, and that when confronted by opposing forces, a victory is far from assured. Further, in the absence of some kind of ‘voodoo’, less than likely in his opinion.

barbarossa2010, however, opines that running away was the wrong thing to do, and has the effect of leaving the casual observer with the impression that Shitfront members are not only racist, but cowardly to boot.

It’s at this point that Perth-based Scumfront moderator Lilith Peterson intervenes, declaring that, while she doesn’t know what happened, the boys (and one girl) should be congratulated — although whether for simply assembling, fleeing, or assembling and then fleeing is somewhat unclear.

Whatever: the event was clearly a triumph for the White Race.

Clearly a fan, Luke Connors (young_soldier) agrees: “Very smart words from the clever cat lady” he claims, recalling the years he spent being beaten up in the boxing ring (before deciding that he’d lead a healthier lifestyle outside of it). BluedEyedBlonde also agrees with Lilith, declaring that running away was “exactly the right thing” to do, and clear evidence of the existence of both “intelligence and courage” among the assembled racists.

Obviously incensed at the accusation of cowardice, Hammerskin38 sets the record straight: during the course of the BBQ, the assembled racists spied some people they believed were Muslims and abused them, whereupon the abused Muslims left. Later, they returned.

One, whom the bonehead in question took to be a leader, asked for an explanation for the abuse, which the bonehead refused, preferring the use of violence to reason.

For reasons which are obvious.

The point being: “THE ARABS WERE GUTLESS SCUM”, and — far from being cowards — the fascists who briefly stood their ground before deciding to leave were fearful of being attacked. (To do otherwise, apparently, would have meant that the assembled fascists ended up dead, in hospital, or in prison.)

Another bonehead, bootboys_brisbane, agrees with Hammerskin38. Interestingly, he adds that he intends journeying to Melbourne, presumably for the Ian Stuart is Dead celebration on September 23rd.

Why on Earth the boneheads in question think that the reception in Melbourne will be any warmer is beyond me.

Posted in Anti-fascism | 6 Comments

Anti-Semitism on campus?

Two articles have appeared in The Age recently alleging an increase in anti-Semitic incidents on campus, and accusing the ‘far left’ — Socialist Alternative in particular — of engaging in intimidating tactics. The first recapitulates a press release from the Australasian Union of Jewish Students:

‘Jews in fear of hardline uni groups’
Barney Zwartz and Adam Morton
The Age
September 4, 2006

RADICAL left-wing groups at Melbourne universities are exploiting tensions in the Middle East to promote anti-Semitism and recruit members, according to Jewish student groups.

“There’s a real feeling of threat,” said Deon Kamien, Victorian president of the [Zionist] Australasian Union of Jewish Students.

He said Jewish students for the first time felt targeted as Jews, rather than supporters of Israel. “When they walk past socialist stalls (on campus) they feel very uncomfortable, especially when called ‘a f—ing Jew’,” Mr Kamien said.

He said Students Against War and Racism gave out leaflets at Monash University recently that said Zionists were murderers and racists and “will not be tolerated on this campus”.

The number of anti-Semitic incidents during the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in July were the highest since records began in 1945, according to Grahame Leonard, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

“At 141, it was 60 per cent higher than the previous record. Many of these incidents were on campus, and the big growth was in Victoria,” Mr Leonard said.

“It’s just blind ideology with these (hard-line left) groups … It’s not about Muslims, it’s about thugs and radicals using Islam as an excuse to pursue their political agenda.”

There have been several incidents on Melbourne campuses, particularly between [SocAlt] and university Liberal Party groups.

In one, a Liberal was grabbed by the throat and threatened. In another, security staff had to separate Students Against War and Racism and Liberal Club members waving Israeli flags.

In Sydney, Jewish students have been spat on and pushed.

Official religious groups on campus say Middle Eastern tensions have not been apparent in Australia. The national heads of Muslim, Jewish, Catholic and Baha’i student groups released a joint statement when conflict broke out in Lebanon.

Monash University Islamic Society president Adhnan Wazil said Jewish students had been quiet and there had been no problems for Muslims.

Mr Kamien said Jewish students had had no problems with Muslim students in general.

Students Against War and Racism organiser Vashti Kenway, a member of [SocAlt], acknowledged Middle Eastern tensions were being used as a recruitment tool, but denied they were anti-Semitic. “We take a firm stand against all forms of racism,” she said.

Melbourne University Student Union president Jessie Giles said anti-war activists walked a fine line between attacking Israel’s actions as a state, which was legitimate, and making students feel awkward over religion, which was not.

Interestingly, these allegations were preceded by similiar allegations of political intimidation of leftists by Zionist students. And on the same day as The Age article, the following appeared in the Herald Sun:

‘Junior Libs accused of Jewish slur’
Ellen Whinnett
Herald-Sun
September 4, 2006

THE Liberal Party is fuming over an embarrassing scandal which has erupted at one of its junior off-shoots, the Melbourne University Liberal Club.

A secretly recorded tape of a meeting is alleged to have caught some university Liberal Club officials swearing, making anti-Semitic remarks and commenting on inciting tensions between Lebanon and Israel.

A club official has been forced to resign after being accused of leaking details about the scandal, but instead of going quietly, the woman fired off an angry email accusing the club of intimidating her.

An infuriated Liberal Party hierarchy has launched an investigation and disciplinary action could be taken against some members of the MULC who are also members of the Liberal Party.

While the two organisations are separate, there are a number of connections, including:

THE club secretary accused of making anti-Semitic remarks, Brendan Rowswell, works for Federal Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella.

THE woman alleged to have secretly recorded the meeting, former club vice-president Jayde Lovell, works at Liberal Party headquarters, Melbourne.

OTHER club members — who are not the subject of any allegations — work for Federal MP Tony Smith and Senator Mitch Fifield, both key allies of Federal Treasurer Peter Costello.

Ms Lovell claims she was forced to resign.

The scandal threatens to damage Liberal Party relations with important allies in the Jewish community and is a serious distraction with the state election just months away.

A transcript of the secret recording, posted on a political blog run by former Melbourne University official Andrew Landeryou, reveals Mr Rowswell is allegedly heard referring to the Australasian Union of Jewish Students’ Michael Gubieski, as a “little Jewish (expletive)”.

Mr Rowswell yesterday told the Herald Sun the comments had been improperly recorded and it was “offensive, insulting and untrue” to claim he was anti-Semitic.

“During a bitter, private discussion of factional university politics, where gratuitous comments were traded, I used crude language,” Mr Rowswell said.

“It was not religiously motivated and I have apologised and my apology has been accepted by the person involved.”

Mr Rowswell said he was a strong supporter of Israel and was a member of two Jewish student organisations.

“What is offensive is that the notion of anti-Semitic inferences has been used in a partisan political way designed for no other purpose than to score an internecine political point,” he said.

Club treasurer Courtney Dixon is alleged to have commented that the returning officer would boot out any ticket that incited tension over Israel and Lebanon and that “we should incite something.”

Mr Dixon agreed yesterday he was the voice on the tape but would not answer any specific questions, saying he was busy.

Liberal Club president Andrew Campbell is alleged to have said at the meeting: “We’re not gonna go out and attack Jews — just Gubieski.”

Mr Campbell’s only comment yesterday was that he would have to check whether it was his voice on the tape.

The row centres on the [University] of Melbourne Student Union elections, which begin today.

Previously, the Union of Jewish Students and the Liberal Club were allies but fell out this year.

Mr Gubieski confirmed he was the person referred to in Mr Rowswell’s comments.

“All I can say is that it is obviously very disappointing but I trust the Liberal Party will know how to take care of it,” he said.

“I do believe I have been vilified but I am more concerned about the cultural problems at the Liberal Club.”

Liberal Party state director Julian Sheezel, who is Jewish, said an investigation had been launched.

“If those remarks are correct, then I am appalled and disgusted,” he said.

The second article from The Age goes into much more depth:

‘An unholy alliance’
Barney Zwartz and Adam Morton
The Age
September 4, 2006

Anti-Semitism is reportedly on the rise across university campuses. Has political opportunism unleashed the devil?

Daniel Wyner is used to robust debate. A senior figure in the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, he moves around Melbourne campuses arguing for Israel. But he was taken aback recently when a Monash lecturer confronted him, almost incoherent with rage, and called him a Zionist oppressor and f—ing racist.

“He kept going on his rant and rave. He wasn’t Muslim or Arab. He may or may not have been a member of the arts faculty, and I may or may not have followed him back into the office to find that out.” The incident highlighted what many Australian Jews claim is a distinct rise in temperature on campus but the hostility has not come from Muslims.

“I’ve been at La Trobe, Deakin and Melbourne too. The problems, the anti-Semitism, the vilification we feel as students on campus are coming almost entirely from the left… Socialist Alternative (a left-wing student group), they just latch on to a cause which isn’t theirs to try to make it their own by twisting it,” Wyner says.

Jewish groups claim some of the more radical left-wing groups are trying to exploit tensions in the Middle East to foment trouble on campus and increase their own numbers. An example, Wyner says, was the recent visit to Melbourne University by the Israeli ambassador: Socialist Alternative members disrupted the meeting and were asked to leave by the Lebanese students’ society.

In Sydney last month, a Jewish student was pushed to the ground and others spat on. At Monash, a Young Liberal member staffing a stall supporting Israel was grabbed by the throat and threatened, while the table was kicked over.

At Melbourne University, security staff had to keep apart the Students Against War and Racism and a group of mostly Liberal Club members waving Israeli flags. Tensions flared, insults were traded and observers said only a handful of guards prevented the conflict becoming physical. The vice-chancellors of both Melbourne and Sydney universities called for calm, saying that while vigorous debate was acceptable, vilification was not.

Grahame Leonard, the president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, says July had the most anti-Semitic incidents since records began in 1945. At 141, the total was 60 per cent higher than the previous record.

“Generally it’s low severity — phone calls, graffiti, hate emails — but there are some violent incidents. The big growth was in Victoria, and many of these incidents were on campus.”

In Sydney some Jewish students feel so intimidated that they are wearing hats over their kippahs (skull caps). In Melbourne they are more defiant, but they are concerned.

“There’s a real feeling of threat,” says Deon Kamien, Victorian president of the Union of Jewish Students. “It’s not something I can put in words. A lot of students who would feel very comfortable wearing a kippah or T-shirt with Hebrew words on it now feel they are being targeted as Jews — not supporters of Israel, but Jews. When they walk past socialist stalls (on campus) they are called f—ing Jews.”

Kamien says that where previous conflicts have been about politics, this time it’s turned racial. “The leftists have completely blurred the line between politics and religion and have misunderstood the situation. They’ve got hung up on the Middle East and absolutely hung up on Jews. What we are seeing is nothing more than anti-Semitism.”

Greg Weinstein, national president of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, says “the left” are uneducated and base their arguments purely on passions rather than fact. “They are misusing what’s happening on the other side of the world to promote their own cause, which is shocking. I don’t think they are gaining credibility.”

It is not just the students, and not just Australia. Ted Lapkin of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council wrote an essay for Quadrant magazine recently, criticising what he terms anti-Semitism by left-wing academics.

“Australian campuses are like most Western universities, but more so,” Lapkin says.

Jewish community leaders detect a rising tide of anti-Semitism throughout the West. They pinpoint a couple of key reasons: the inoculation effect of the Holocaust is disappearing over time, so that dinner-table anti-Semitism is re-emerging. People who don’t like Jews feel more comfortable about expressing it.

Second, they say, Israel provides a convenient excuse. They accept that most criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, but say it can provide a convenient cover for attacking Jews generally. A red-line warning for the Jewish community is when critics compare Israel to the Nazis. You don’t use a Nazi slur if you know what the Nazis did, and if you do know and use it, that’s inexcusable, they believe.

Jews ask why British university lecturers insisted that Israeli academics sign a statement dissociating themselves from Israel’s “apartheid” policies if they wished to teach in Britain. Is Israel worse than China, or Sudan or North Korea or Iran?

The answer, they are convinced, is that latent anti-Semitism is resurfacing. A Christian observer at Melbourne University, who did not want to be named, certainly thinks that’s the explanation in this city. He says “Jew-baiting” is rising, as opponents try to turn anti-Israel sentiment to anti-Jewish. “Socialists bait Jewish students. The intention is to get Jewish students to fight back so they can use them. It’s a deliberate incitement of people’s emotions to generate conflict.”

Socialist Alternative tactics are outlined in an in-house publication.

Discussing an incident at Melbourne, when a socialist stall was overturned, Daniel L. says the best response is to “immediately make a huge fuss — denounce them loudly, screaming ‘you’re a murderer, you support George Bush’s war, you support killing innocent people in the Middle East, you’re fascist scum’ and so forth. When we did this it had a huge polarising effect with people coming up afterwards to show their support. Often this was from the point of view of freedom of speech, rather than a willingness to support fighting Israel. But that doesn’t change the fact that it is excellent terrain for us.”

One writer, Vashti, says “two young Lebanese guys came up and asked if they could beat up the Zionists”.

Daniel says of this: “They knew which side they were on and were willing to fight. We do not want to start fights with the Liberals ourselves, but if Lebanese people do it’s a good thing and we’re f—ing well with them.”

Melbourne University Student Union president Jessie Giles says the campus has been polarised. “Socialist Alternative in particular have been responsible for whipping up some of this sentiment, and I also think the Melbourne University Liberal Club is equally to blame on the other side.” The Socialist Alternative group admit they used the Middle East conflict to recruit members but deny that they are racist.

Vashti Kenway, a Socialist Alternative member at Melbourne and organiser of Students Against War and Racism rallies, says: “I’m pretty unashamed about saying that I think it would be good if there were more socialists in Australia who were against all the horrors of the Howard Government.”

She argues that it’s wrong and lazy to accuse critics of Israel of anti-Semitism. “We take a firm stand against all forms of racism, and that includes anti-Semitism. No one from Socialist Alternative has made any racists slurs against anyone.”

Colleen Bolger, Socialist Alternative organiser at Monash, says the Australasian Union of Jewish Students conflates anti-zionism with anti-Semitism. She says students supporting Israel have surrounded socialist stalls on campus, yelling “terrorist”.

Is she misusing the conflict for political ends? “I’d reject the idea that we shouldn’t be recruiting people who agree with us. This is a perfectly legitimate thing for a political organisation to do. We certainly don’t create the wars, we stand up against them.”

Has the left used racism? This is being debated inside the left, as shown by an exchange in late July on a group email list run by the National Union of Students. Chris Di Pasquale of the RMIT Student Union wrote that Zionists at Melbourne and Monash universities “felt the need to reassert their racism and fetish for genocide and mass slaughter of Arab people”, calling security and the student union to shut down socialist stalls.

National Union of Students president Rose Jackson wrote that this was a racist remark that would be extremely hurtful to some people in the student movement. While she opposed the war in Lebanon, “you do not need to resort to this type of distressingly hateful name-calling to show people that you are left-wing and radical. There will come a point (if it has not already been reached) where suddenly people in the left will feel they can get away with anything when talking about Israel and the Israeli people. Where no comments or insults are off-limits.”

As she wrote, she knew she was inviting attack. She didn’t have to wait long. Heidi Claus, the union’s Victorian education officer, replied: “WHAT THE!!!!!!!! Rose Jackson you are an apologist for the racist state of Israel and fundamentally uninformed.”

Claus claimed that the apartheid state of Israel was set up on the blood of the Palestinian people, and there would never be peace while Zionism or Israel continued to exist. It was Jackson, in fact, who was racist because she equated the Jewish people with Zionism which itself was anti-Semitic. She concluded: “I demand an apology from you for your racist filth and an apology to Chris and Socialist Alternative for your blatant slander.”

Muslims are distancing themselves. Chaaban Omran, national president of the Federation of Australian Muslim Students and Youth, says some left groups can be too aggressive. “They are using this momentum, the build-up of mistake after mistake (by Israel). At the end of the day they have their own agenda. We are quite happy to work with them about Lebanon or Palestine, but not the extreme views of being aggressive. We say there’s an intellectual way to do it.”

Omran says Islamic societies on campus are extremely cautious because they are so aware of keeping Muslim extremists out. “There are some Muslims and far-left students who see issues in black and white, but we try to promote that there’s a middle path.” He says that when Islamic societies on campus have a website with a forum, which can’t be controlled, extremist views can be posted.

“But you don’t know who’s putting it on, students or people from outside wanting to cause trouble. Usually a couple of people reply immediately saying that’s not the way, or we send an email saying that.” “Extreme”, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. “We’re not about to stop anyone from saying people in Lebanon have the right to defend themselves, but we haven’t had calls for jihad.”

Omran says there has not been a single report of Muslim students being intimidated, but Muslims are nevertheless increasingly frustrated. “They feel the world is walking all over them, that Muslim blood is very cheap, of less importance, that there’s a blatant attempt to demonise anyone of Islamic faith by politicians or certain parts of the media. This can only lead to radicalisation, and we should look forward to more extremism.”

Australia needs to tackle the cause, rather than the symptom, by fixing its foreign policy. Greg Weinstein thinks the religious groups on campus are providing the right model. When the Middle East conflict broke out, he says, the national presidents of the Jewish, Muslim, Catholic and Baha’i student associations issued a joint statement calling for unity and prayers for peace. Over the past few weeks he and Muslim president Kaled El-Hassan have become friends; the pair met for lunch last week and solved a few of the world’s problems.

Barney Zwartz is religion editor and Adam Morton is higher education reporter.

More later…

See also : ‘Australia’s Israel Question’ : a speech by (Justice) Alan Goldberg at the Melbourne Writers’ Festival, August 27, 2006

Posted in Media, State / Politics, Student movement, Trot Guide, War on Terror | 5 Comments

Josh Outta Jail!

‘Bail granted for journalist Josh Wolf’
Bob Egelko
San Francisco Chronicle
August 31, 2006

(08-31) 15:46 PDT SAN FRANCISCO — Josh Wolf, a freelance journalist who has been jailed since Aug. 1 for refusing to turn over videos of a political protest to a federal grand jury, was granted bail today by a federal appeals court…

Links to commentary and reportage in the Australian (corporate / state) media on the first blogger to be targeted by US Federal authorities for not cooperating with a grand jury below :

Posted in Anarchism, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Little Rich Working Class Oi Boy (Part 2)

Jesus Christ. Hit a couple of young black girls with a metal police baton while you’re shouting racist slurs – and get sentenced to community service in a homeless shelter?

Oh, I may have left out something relevant. Did I mention Josh Spaulding, the 28-year-old [bonehead] (aka “Jazz”), is a Boston blueblood and his dad’s a Boston cultural maven?

He’s also the grandson of the former head of the Massachusetts GOP, who ran for the Senate in 1970. Having the right relatives sure seems to help…

Susan Madrak concludes by asking “I just wonder if angry young men without such blue blood – or such very white skin – get the same understanding treatment”.

Kinda like how the neo-Nazi piece of shit Ross Hack got away with murder really.

Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Little Rich Working Class Oi Boy

How come skinhead oi boys have no work
I bet if they did they’d go berserk
Shut up about the working class
A job is no big deal
You all look like Hitler Youth – good job
That’s some appeal

You oi-boys and oi-girls have quite the scene
At shows you love to gang up and get mean
The ones I know were racist then
But that’s all in the past
Excuse my not believing you
It’s happened much too fast

Little rich working class oi boy
Little rich working class oi boy
Little rich working class oi boy

You look and act and talk like Nazi goons
If you truly cared you’d change your tune
The aura you exude tells everyone just how you feel
I don’t buy your bullshit boys
Sorry, there’s no deal

For DC.

See also : “I’d like to dedicate this next song to…”

Posted in Anti-fascism, History, Music | 1 Comment

Andrew Fraser “sorry” for racist remarks…

…the fucking liar.

‘Academic sorry for racist remarks’
Alyssa Braithwaite
August 30, 2006
[AAP]

A SYDNEY academic who created a racial furore by claiming African refugees were linked to high crime rates has apologised for his comments.

Macquarie University Associate Professor Andrew Fraser sparked the racial controversy in June last year when his letter making the remarks was published in local newspaper, the Parramatta Sun.

The university subsequently suspended him from teaching after he made further comments about Sudanese refugees and non-white immigration.

Safi Hareer from the Sudanese Darfurian Union sought a public apology from… Fraser in a complaint to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC), saying the academic’s letter had breached the Racial Discrimination Act.

[Fraser] received a letter from HREOC president John von Doussa in April saying his comments were unlawful, and rejecting the professor’s submission that the letter held academic merit.

Mr von Doussa invited [Fraser] to a HREOC conciliation with Mr Hareer, urging him to apologise for the letter.

At the time [Fraser] said an apology “was out of the question”.

But Mr Hareer’s lawyer, George Newhouse, said [Fraser] had apologised to his client and the matter had been settled.

A public apology will also be published in the Parramatta Sun newspaper today.

“After mediation, [Fraser] agreed to apologise to Mr Hareer and to the Sudanese community in Australia,” Mr Newhouse said.

Mr Newhouse said [Fraser] had acknowledged that he had hurt fellow Australians.

“Andrew Fraser has apologised for his hurtful statements and Safi Hareer has accepted his apology,” he said.

“(Mr Hareer) was really pleased that two people with different views could sit down and discuss and resolve their differences in a human way, man to man.

“All credit to [Fraser] for apologising, and I’m glad it was done without going to court because really, no-one wants to do that.”

[Fraser] could not be contacted last night.

Not unexpectedly, news of Fraser’s ‘apology’ has been greeted on Scumfront, Fraser’s strongest supporter, with some dismay — and this appraisal by James Newman, the bonehead who videoed the Cronulla riots, added a Skrewdriver soundtrack, then uploaded it to the site:

As [Fraser] said at the [Sydney Forum]… He apologized for hurting any thin-skinned people who may have been offended [by his remarks,] but still believes that importing [sic] large numbers of blacks to Australia is a sure fire way [to] increase… crime and other social problems. [This] they can[‘]t deny because it is the truth[.] That[‘]s why they never took him to court because they knew they would lose. [Fraser] said they could do what they liked with the apology[,] but there is no way he would [pay] to have it printed in the media.

This is nothing but spin from that dog Newhouse.

As usual, the bonehead in question gets it arse-backwards: if Fraser “apologized”, it was likely because he estimated that, if it went to court, he would lose. Still, the bonehead’s account is useful if for no other reason than it demonstrates the (in)sincerity of Fraser’s “apology”.

Further, the fact is Fraser has been very active since June 2005, the date of publication of his racist letter to the Parramatta Sun, reportedly a result of Fraser’s “…seeing a photograph of a Sudanese child” in the paper. “Associate Professor Fraser wrote to the newspaper saying ‘an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems’.”

Indeed, according to the Canadian-born Fraser in an interview with Ray Martin on ACA (July 17, 2005), the ‘typical’ Australian is and should be “the sun-bronzed, blonde, blue-eyed Aussie. That is what brought me down here. That is what, I would say, brought many people down here, the belief that what was really attractive about Australia, was that it was populated by [sun-bronzed, blonde, blue-eyed] Australians”.

Soon afterwards, Fraser’s membership of and status as ‘legal adviser’ to the (now largely defunct) Patriotic Youth League (PYL) were exposed (‘Top academic accused of neo-Nazi links’, The Australian, July 20, 2005); his lying protestations to the contrary undermined by Melbourne resident Luke Connors of the PYL. One measure of Connors’ character may be found in the same email in which Fraser’s status was revealed: “Mr Connors said he had conducted an online poll asking PYL members to identify the most troublesome minority in their area: ‘abos, curry munchers, wogs or chinks?'”.

Following his refusal to have his contract bought out by the University (Fraser was due to retire in June this year) and then being suspended from teaching duties, Fraser had his essay ‘Rethinking the White Australia Policy’ — Fraser’s Big Idea is a return to a White Australia — rejected by Deakin University for inclusion in the Deakin Law Review.

Denounced as a racist and a shoddy academic, as a show of support for Fraser, the fascist Australia First Party (of which the PYL was its nominal youth wing) organised a rally on October 8th, 2005 outside Kirribilli House. Led by the neo-Nazi criminal Dr. James Saleam, AFP could only manage to attract a handful of protesters: the bulk of Fraser’s support was generated by racists and fascists on sites such as Scumfront. Still, one good turn deserves another, and in February 2006, Fraser travelled to Virginia in the United States to address the White supremacist 2006 American Renaissance Conference.

After having been informed in April 2006 by HREOC that, in their opinion, his original letter was illegal, Fraser declared that he was unwilling to ‘apologise’. According to Greg Roberts (‘No apology for linking Africans to crime’, The Australian, April 4, 2006):

In a landmark ruling that raises fresh questions about the limits to which academics can engage in public debate, HREOC chairman John von Doussa has found Professor Fraser’s comments were unlawful because they amounted to a “sweeping generalisation” that was not backed by research…

But Professor Fraser told The Australian he would not apologise to anyone.

“Even those who disagree with me should be appalled at this attack on the freedom of academic debate”,” he said.

“This gives the lie to all those politicians who’ve claimed that racial hatred legislation would not curb freedom of expression in Australia”.

After having denied the offer of a free ticket to one of Rain Pryor’s performances at the Melbourne Comedy Festival, Fraser accepted the opportunity to cite the convicted neo-Nazi criminal Ben Weerheym in his essay ‘Rethinking the White Australia Policy’.

Finally, last weekend Fraser addressed the fascist Sydney Forum, an address which may, in turn, have been a way of saying ‘thanks’ to AFP following their ‘action’ in support of Fraser at the Sydney office of George Newhouse on July 26.

And now he’s sorry?

Posted in Anti-fascism | 29 Comments

Bulldog Spirit @ Wasted Festival, Melbourne, September 2nd, 2006

    To be a Skinhead, you must love your Doc Martens. You must love ska music. You must have the right attitude, the right attitude from the heart and the brain. You must like football. You must like to dance harder than anybody else, of any subculture. And most of all, you need to be anti-racist.

Well it’s no big secret that I’m into scooters.

April 1, 2005. Interview with Fiona : aussieskins :

Doug : I met some of those “SHARP” kids in Missing Link and they didn’t have a problem with us. In fact they apologised for fighting during our set at the punk’s picnic…

The only people that really gave us shit were those oh-so open-minded PC crusty types at the picnic… as soon as we got up on the stage at the punk’s picnic they started shouting stuff out at us like ‘Smash the Nazis’ and all this type of crap. I think we got discriminated against because we wash and have jobs and haircuts…

But seriously, Melbourne is the only place we’ve been to where any of that political crap has gone on.

Saturday, April 27, 2002. Bulldog Spirit Melbourne Tour Diary :

Doug : “When we played Dirty Ol’ Town, Adam says, in the height of good humour, ‘this o­ne’s for Ulster’ as I’m doing the harmonica intro…” Man then asks Doug what Adam means. “I told him there was nothing to it”; obviously it was a remark made at complete random. Same man then asks ‘Why do you have to be such a fucking girl?’

I asked him ‘Did you just call me a girl?’ He said ‘yes’, so I responded accordingly with a quick headbutt to the nose… The sad thing about it is, someone said that the Ulster bloke’s mate was the guitarist from Vicious Circle. Along with Depression and Civil Dissident, they are o­ne of my favourite Aussie bands and I was looking forward to playing with them at the picnic. No hard feelings there I hope.

Sunday, April 28, 2002. Bulldog Spirit Melbourne Tour Diary :

Back to the Birmingham

It seems the [bonehead] contingent all waited until today to see Bulldog Spirit. BHK played first today, unfortunately to a pretty empty room… Bulldog Spirit played next and the room filled out a bit as the [bones] came in to watch. Rotten played after us and I reckon they were even better than at the picnic. I’m really impressed with this band. Kind of ’85 style chaos punk done really well. The [bones] asked James from Rotten if they could play a couple of ‘apolitical’ songs. Ideologically James was very much opposed, but in reality he didn’t really have much choice as they pretty much outnumbered everyone in the room. The boys, Bail Up!, played some solid sounding Oi style tunes including a Last Resort and a 4 Skins cover before diverting from their ‘apolitical’ stand and launching into full blown white power stuff.

Monday, April 29, 2002. Bulldog Spirit Melbourne Tour Diary :

We went back to the Arthouse to pick up our gear, pay up, and leave. The guy at the Arty said that he got a phone call at 3am o­n Sunday morning saying that there were twenty blokes coming to get us and that he’d better let them in. The guy told them that we were at a party so they didn’t bother showing. Talk about a storm in a teacup.

‘I hate quoting bands to make a point, but Roddy Moreno summed it up pretty well’:

To close I’d just like to say:

FUCK FASCISM BEFORE IT FUCKS YOU.

STAY S-H-A-R-P.

Bulldog Spirit will be playing this Saturday at The Espy between 7.40 – 8.10 in The Gershwin Room.

The following bands will happily be sharing the stage with them:

PETER AND THE TEST TUBE BABIES, BEERZONE, NO IDEA, THE BLURTERS, CHARTER 77, MARCHING ORDERS, THE BLACK MARKET, THE CORPS, DRAGSTRIPPERS, HATEMAIL, SCHLAUNCHER, CHAOS 69, RULE 303 and THE TWITS, CRACKWHORE, BASTARD SQUAD, PISS CHRIST, THE HOMICIDES, DISTORTED TRUTH, GODNOSE, HEAD INC., RITALIN, SLICK 46, RUN FOR COVER, UNEMPLOYED SUPER VILLIANS, DARKEST DAY and R.U.S.T.

See also : Blut und Ehre : Melbourne ISD Memorial Gig : September 23, 2006 // Good Skinhead Music // Poland: Solidarity for Tomek Wilkoszewski // “White Terrror” // Loikaemie

Posted in Anti-fascism, Music | 49 Comments

Ask Uncle Noam!

The Independent has published Chomsky’s responses to a number of questions put to him by readers. A sample:

The first victims of the Communist oppression in Cuba were anarchists, so how can you, as a confessed Libertarian Socialist (Anarchist?) justify ideologically your uncritical visit in October 2003 to dictator Fidel Castro? CLAUDE MOREIRA, WELLING, LONDON

The “uncritical visit” is a fabrication of British editors. As they knew, I was an invited speaker (along with prominent British and American scholars) at an international conference of the society of Latin American scholars, which happened to meet that year in Havana, and used the opportunity to criticise state repression quite harshly on Cuban national TV and in a public meeting. Castro routinely met attendees. I’ve often actually met high officials of countries that have carried out incomparably worse crimes than anything attributed to Castro, even travelled to meet them, unlike this case: the US, to take the most obvious example.

Will Anarchism ever be taken seriously as a political philosophy? IAN DUNT

That’s up to us.

Posted in Anarchism | Leave a comment