Ron Jacobs // Neo-Nazis // More murders

Ron Jacobs is some kinda US revolutionary, and the author of what is purported to be the first comprehensive history of the Weather Underground, The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground (Verso, 1997). He’s also had a brush with neo-Nazis, as the following extract from an interview (‘What’s Next?’) in the latest issue of Monthly Review zine reveals:

JR : In ‘It Did Happen Here’ [see below] you talk about Nazi youths in Olympia. Did you live in Olympia at the time? How did you cover this story, and what did you find out about the modern neo-Nazi movement?

RJ: I did live in Olympia at the time of Bob’s murder by the two [neo-Nazis]. I was good friends with a group of young anarchists and others who put out zines, did a lot of political agitation and organizing, and opposed [neo-Nazis] and war whenever and wherever they could. I also worked at the Olympia library with a young woman who was a good friend of Bob’s. She turned me on to a couple folks who were in Sylvester Park the night Bob was killed. I had my notes when I left Olympia in 1992 and followed the story from there, with the help of Anna Schlecht and a few other Olympians. It was then that I wrote the story. The modern neo-Nazi movement is small but rabid. The fact that young people could become so involved in hate took me by a bit of a surprise at first, but it shouldn’t have. I think that we haven’t heard the last of these groups. In fact, their numbers may even increase as the anti-immigrant movement continues in our nation’s legislatures and newspapers…

See also : Ron Jacobs, ‘It Did Happen Here: When Neo-Nazis Terrorized Olympia’, Counterpunch, October 2/3, 2004; Olympia Unity in the Community, the coalition formed to fight racist and fascist shit in the wake of Bob’s murder; recent neo-Nazi activism in Olympia, via Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace.

‘SERBIA: Neo-Nazis threaten to kill independent journalist’, Committee to Protect Journalists, New York, April 3, 2007 : “The Committee to Protect Journalists is alarmed by death threats made against Dinko Gruhonjic, head of the Vojvodina branch of the independent news agency BETA and chairman of the Independent Journalists’ Association of Vojvodina, by a local neo-Nazi group.

The threats, which were posted on a neo-Nazi Web site this week, stem from Gruhonjic’s coverage of National Formation, a neo-Nazi group based in the northern Serbian city of Novi Sad, the journalist told CPJ. Gruhonjic’s reports publicized the group’s activities, including a 2005 organized attack where neo-Nazis armed with crowbars attacked participants marking the anniversary of Kristallnacht — a pogrom against Jews throughout Germany and parts of Austria in 1938 — according to local and international press reports…”

‘Neo-Nazis Kill Anti-Fascists in Izhevsk, Russia’, UCSJ, April 4, 2007 : “Neo-Nazis murdered an anti-fascist activist in Izhvesk, Russia (Republic of Udmurtiya) and may be responsible for a second killing, according to a March 29, 2007 report in the local newspaper Tsenter and an April 4, 2007 report by the Sova Information-Analytical Center. On March 27, several dozen neo-Nazis reportedly attacked anti-fascist youths in the downtown area as they were skateboarding. One of the victims later died in the hospital. Four youths were detained in relation to the attack, but were later released, apparently after their alibis were confirmed. The Sova report added that a 14 year old girl who may have been injured in the earlier attack died in the hospital on April 2.

The Tsentr article gave a brief history of neo-Nazi violence in recent years — a February 2004 attack that left a young man with serious brain trauma, and an August 2006 knifing. Prosecutors dropped extremism charges against suspects in the first case and the investigation into the stabbing expired without any charges.”

    Fascism is not something to be ignored, and it’s not something to be debated.

    It is to be smashed.

Posted in Anti-fascism | Leave a comment

Josh Wolf Outta Jail!

Anarchist journalist Josh Wolf has finally been released from a US prison, after having spent 226 days behind bars for refusing to testify to US authorities regarding an anti-G8 demonstration (organised by anarchists) in San Francisco in July, 2005.

    ‘Josh Wolf, who considers himself an anarchist and “loosely identifies” with the indybay group, spent the evening videotaping events. He said at one point, “Some sort of a scuffle broke out, which prompted a whole bunch of cops to declare martial law. They said ‘Disperse!’ and aimed laser-pointed taser guns at us — it was like something out of Star Wars.” As for why the protesters had gathered in the first place, Wolf said, “The mission is to make an affront against capitalism and empire.”‘ ~ Nanette Asimov, ‘Protest turns violent in the Mission District’, San Francisco Chronicle, July 9, 2005

Wolf has been freed after US authorities finally agreed to a compromise deal, first pitched to them in November 2006, in which Wolf agreed to release uncut footage he took of the protest, while at the same time refusing to testify before a specially-convened Grand Jury regarding the identities of those who took part.

Here’s Wolf’s statement upon his release:

“It took 226 days, but it was worth every second to get what I wanted from day one, which is that I will not have to testify before the grand jury about the events at the protest or the identities of participants. The demand for my testimony before the grand jury was the true assault on my code of ethics and, as I have stated previously, there will be, and has been no compromise to this resolute principle.

Today, I posted the video footage to my web site so that the public will have the opportunity to see that there is nothing of value in this unpublished footage. As there is no sensitive material on the tape, there was no reason to remain in prison, given the fact that I got what I wanted from day one – the right to protect journalists from having to testify before a grand jury.

Until now, I had no assurances that publishing the video would lead to my release and furthermore had every indication that it would have the opposite result and indicate to the judge that the so-called coercive effect was working. That has changed.

I do feel that my unpublished materials should be protected by a Federal Shield and moving forward, that is where I will focus my efforts. Journalists should have the right to be protected from testifying before a grand jury and I will not stop fighting until there is a law that protects us.”

See Sarah Phelan, ‘Wolf Freed!’, San Francisco Bay Guardian, April 4, 2007; ‘Freelance journalist Josh Wolf released after 224 days in prison, Reporters sans frontières, April 4, 2007; Jesse McKinley, ‘8-Month Jail Term Ends as Maker of Video Turns Over a Copy’, The New York Times, April 4, 2007; Howard Kurtz, ‘Blogger Makes Deal, Is Released From Jail’, Washington Post, April 4, 2007:

…The case sparked a First Amendment debate over whether Wolf is a journalist and whether he deserved protection for the video he shot of the 2005 protest against a G-8 summit meeting in Scotland, since he made no explicit promises of confidentiality. Wolf sold other parts of the tape to local television stations and posted those portions online. In reaching the agreement with prosecutors, Wolf backed off his original position that he would not turn over the footage.

A viewing of the video leaves unclear why Wolf fought so hard to protect it. Three protesters in hooded sweat shirts and kerchiefs partly hiding their faces are seen talking to bystanders, followed by a handful of protesters who make no effort to hide their identity. Demonstrators are seen marching with such banners as “Destroy the War Machine,” and in one case dragging newspaper boxes into the street to block traffic. At one point they surround a fallen colleague on the sidewalk, and a police officer walks over and tells everyone to stand back.

Asked if he was worried about identifying protesters, Wolf said: “I could not answer that question before the grand jury. There were various promises made, both directly and indirectly.” He declined to elaborate.

Wolf said he believed that prosecutors had him subpoenaed and ultimately jailed “to send a message to the press and public that they will stop at nothing” to compel grand jury testimony.

During the protest, San Francisco police officer Peter Shields had his skull fractured by a hooded assailant with a pipe or baseball bat. Wolf said he was 30 yards away at the time but did not see the attack because he was taping a scuffle between police and another protester.

As an alternative to testifying, Wolf answered two questions in writing. He said he did not know whom Shields was attempting to take into custody at the time he was struck. Wolf also said he did not see anyone throw or shoot anything at a police car during the demonstration, nor did he learn such information from another source. Prosecutors said they reserve the right to subpoena him again, which Garbus called a face-saving claim.

Wolf, whose mother mounted a media campaign on his behalf, used yesterday’s settlement to push for a national law protecting journalists from being forced to testify about confidential sources. More than 30 states and the District have shield laws. He said on his blog, Joshwolf.net, that the case “further reinforces the clear and present need for a federal shield law, and I am optimistic that these recent developments will help to pave the way for its passage by Congress.”

Asked how he coped with being incarcerated, Wolf said: “It was difficult at times, easier at others. You get into a routine, something breaks that routine, and you’re very sensitive to that.”

Prosecutors said in an earlier court filing that Wolf, who is not affiliated with any news outlet, was “simply a person with a video camera” and that his resistance to testifying was “apparently fueled by his anointment as a journalistic martyr.”

Was he acting as a journalist in videotaping the demonstration?

“It was journalism to the extent that I went out to capture the truth and present it to the public,” Wolf said. “It has nothing to do with whether or not I’m employed by a corporation or I carry a press pass.”

Also AP, ‘After 226 days, freelance journalist Josh Wolf released from jail’, First Amendment Center, April 4, 2007; Bob Egelko and Jim Herron Zamora, ‘THE JOSH WOLF CASE: Blogger freed after giving video to feds’, San Francisco Chronicle, April 4, 2007.

It’s a measure of how shitful the Australian corporate/state media is that there has not been one single word published or spoken regarding Wolf’s case by it throughout his entire 8-month ordeal… and it’s only going to get worse.

Posted in Anarchism, Media, State / Politics | 1 Comment

Heil Heil Reich ‘n’ Roll! Blood Red Eagle’s Blitzkrieg Tour of Wellington

Douglas Schott, courtesy of Blood & Honour New Zealand, the New Zealand Hammerskins and New Zealand Tourism, is taking his very peculiar brand of neo-Nazi ‘Viking rock’ to New Zealand / Aotearoa on April 21, when Blood Red Eagle are scheduled to play at the Satan’s Slaves clubhouse in Wellington. Note that the gig is being held in order to help celebrate the birth of the world’s most famous dead incestuous coprophiliac Nazi dictator, Adolf Hitler, on April 20, 1889; further, that the white supremacist Satan’s Slaves previously played host to some other neo-Nazi schmucks from Australia (Death’s Head) in a similar celebration in April 2005. In addition, Blood Red Eagle played at Bulldog Spirit and Charter 77‘s favourite pub, The (neo-Nazi) Birmy in Fitzroy, Melbourne, in September, 2006 to celebrate the death of Ian Stuart Donaldson in 1993 (Stuart was the co-founder — with the dead gay bonehead, Nicky Crane — of B&H in 1987). This is the same gig which prompted a half-dozen or so incredibly manly boneheads to assault a lone woman later that same night — not that incredibly manly (just look at those tatts!) local working class ‘punks’ care.

The band otherwise happily performs at the Hamilton Hotel in Newcastle: — last performing at the venue in February, 2006.

It is unknown, at this stage, if members of the Newcastle RSL will be joining neo-Nazis from Newcastle in wishing Doug & The Boys all the best on their blitzkrieg tour, or whether or not local Wellington ex-servicemen and women have been invited by any of the groups or individuals involved in organising the gig to join them in pissing all over the graves of their fallen comrades. In any case, let’s hope Doug’s winged helmet doesn’t fall off as he paddles back to Australia in his longboat, fuelled by P.

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, Music | 8 Comments

I think, therefore I blog

(Please be advised that I have only drunk one cup of coffee this morning and that I am still recovering from having my third nipple scratched by Bübi the cat…)

Aw shucks.

I’m the [e]victim of a chain[e]mail [e]conspiracy, by way of insultadarity (now with added blunt instruments!) and miss p. And it goes something like this:

    1. If, and only if, you get tagged, write a post with 5 blogs that make you think;
    2. Link to this post so that people can find the exact origin of the meme;
    3. Optional: Proudly display the “Thinking Blogger Award” with a link to the post that you wrote (there is a silver version if gold doesn’t fit your blog);
    4. Your chosen blogs cannot have been previously awarded.

Apparently, I make The Insultingly Solidaric One and Miss Politics think. Which is OK, I guess, insofar as it constitutes a step towards them thinking about sending me all their money. Anyway, here’s five more blogs among the many I could’ve nominated:

1) the66pow : it’s funny ‘cos it’s true… ‘cos he’s seen it all from quite close up. makes me think: who the hell is this bloke, and can i steal his record collection?;
2) archive : s0metim3s : throwing caution to the wind, a let’s it all hang out on her blog, cleverly disguised as thoughtful ruminations on contemporary critical theory. ‘n’ politics. ‘n’ that. makes me think: i really should spend less time blogging and more time studying proper-like;
3) buggery.org : written by a clever, funny bugger, who takes correct spelling, grammar and good design seriously. makes me think: there’s hope for nt;
4) DIRELAND : by journalist doug ireland, direland provides informed and wide-ranging commentary on european and us politics, and global struggles for sexual liberation in general. which sounds quite serious. and, generally speaking, it is. makes me think: you can actually make a living stringing words together?;
5) Wilson’s Blogmanac : pip wilson is an old hippie who blogs. makes me think: i want to be a hippie and i want to get stoned (and i want to live in bellingen).

Posted in !nataS, Media | 11 Comments

Anarchy 101 : Race

The latest issue (#63) of Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed contains an essay on ‘Anarchy 101: Race’ by Leona Benten, which discusses the meaning and significance of the concept of ‘race’ in the context of US history and politics in particular (which, according to the author, “is probably more complicated in the US than anywhere else”):

The concept of race has traditionally had two distinct but overlapping ways of being understood in the US, one scientific, and the other historic. The scientific position rests on the pretense that there are biological differences that explain cultural differences; the historic position is that differences in culture (whether from non-European origins or from oppression once arriving here) and in social standing create a distinct group of people with identifiable and predictable characteristics. These days scientists follow the liberal argument that we humans are all the same and all that holds us back from a non-racist society are the remnants of bigotry. This argument neither addresses the cultural standards fundamental to US society about what and how we value, nor does it leave room for the idea that race issues are deep enough (for example how we think about race is part of the polarized and dualistic world view that limits our options in multiple ways) that changing them would require a complete restructuring of society.

There are two main anarchist stances on race: one could be called the activist tendency and the other perhaps the atomist…

I think I’ll respond to it later, but in the meantime, it brings to mind two things: one is Paint It Black: Anarchism, Urban Uprising and the Mainstream News Media by Jessica Lawless (2001); and, for some reason, an essay by Pierre Bourdieu and Loïc Wacquant, ‘The New Global Vulgate’ (The Baffler, #12, 1999): — I think ‘cos of Benten’s reference to (yet another form of) ‘American exceptionalism’… and I’m So Bored of the U.S.A.

(But what can I do?)

Posted in Anarchism | Leave a comment

Skinhead (according to The Observer)

    “To be a Skinhead, you must love your Doc Martens. You must love ska music. You must have the right attitude, the right attitude from the heart and the brain. You must like football. You must like to dance harder than anybody else, of any subculture. And most of all, you need to be anti-racist.” ~ Buster Bloodvessel

Getting under their skins
Simon Garfield
The Observer
April 1, 2007

Skinheads created one of the most iconic youth movements ever to emerge in Britain. It quickly became defined by terror, menace and racism. But beneath the shaved heads and steel-capped boots lay a more complex reality. Now the style and substance of this uniquely English tribe is to be reassessed in a new film and an exhibition of stunning photographs taken by a young skinhead in the early Eighties.

For a while in the late Sixties and early Eighties, Britain fostered a youth cult so iconic in its imagery, and so threatening in its pose, that we [?] remain ashamed of it decades later. Steel-capped boots and jeans with back pockets shaped by sharpened metal combs: that was the look, all aggravation and bristle, the terror at station platforms and football terraces and corner shops. Fashion is about many things – money, humiliation, fitting in and sticking out – but until skinheads showed up it was rarely about menace.

And now the menace is back, as unfashionable as ever and ripe for rehabilitation. There aren’t so many skinheads on British streets any more, and, like punk, the cult has been exported, occasionally with comic results, to Europe, the United States and the Far East. But new interest is emerging – an exhibition, the reissue of classic books, and a striking film called This Is England, the latest work from director Shane Meadows. The movie, a classic rites-of-passage saga, is most memorable for its performances and its look, and for the near-perfect recreation of the oddest of cults. It is the first truly empathetic skinhead film that neither glorifies nor condemns the tribe, and places its conflicts of comradeship, masculinity, music, hormones and extreme-right politics in a fully realised setting, the summer of 1983, with Britain searching for identity in the shadow of the Falklands and Margaret Thatcher‘s tireless dismantling of community. If you lived through it, you will recognise it.

You may not, however, recognise the humanity of its subjects. These days, the word skinhead can conjure images only of hatred and racism, but that is our [sic] problem. How it came to be a problem is instructive, and tells us something about the power of imagery, and the nature of our [sic] prejudices.

‘Skinhead’s a way of life, a culture I live by,’ says a present-day [?] skinhead called Pan on the website skinheadnation.com [sic] (‘A true family of brothers and sisters that spans the globe’). ‘It’s about having pride in the way I look, it’s about working for my living, earning everything I get. It’s about the second family I have with my mates on the street, about being true to the values that I learnt, the honour code. [It’s all about that coming together, and i]t’s the truest culture because you’re talking about the real people, the working people, the poor people. [Endquote. Garfield then runs together Pan’s quote with the words of the site’s author, George Marshall:] To outsiders, we represent the scum of the earth, but we know better. We know that we are the part of the greatest youth cult of all time, and nobody can ever take that away from us. It really is us against the world, and as we know all too well the world doesn’t stand a chance.’

[See also : George Marshall, Spirit of ’69: A Skinhead Bible, ST Publishing, Glasgow, 1993.]

From where does his honour code spring? The marines were called skinheads in the Second World War, but the term was first applied to British youth towards the end of the Sixties. The ‘h’ was silent – skin’ead, the description that stuck after its rivals – ‘peanuts’, ‘cropheads’, ‘boiled eggs’, ‘skulls’ fell away. The style – particularly the hair, the clean lines of Ben Sherman shirts and braced Levi’s, the Doc Martens Air Wear shoes and boots, the rat-tail hair and miniskirt for girls – derived directly from the gang end of the mod movement; younger brothers taking the fashion further and harder, eventually on to the football terraces with improvised household weapons. Amphetamines, the staple of the mod all-nighter, were popular, augmented by cannabis and solvents. Like the clothes, the music couldn’t have been more removed from hippiedom: skinheads plundered the Jamaican dancefloor and adopted rude-boy tastes of bluebeat and ska. The tribal gatherings at Brighton and Southend presented a dilemma: who were the skins actually up against, beyond broad authority? By the height of glam in 1972, skinheads had run out of stomping ground.

When they returned in the late Seventies, they had their own style manual. This was not something one might have anticipated from an anti-fashion movement that made things up as it went along, but Jim Ferguson’s ‘Fashion Notebook’ [a chapter in Nick Knight’s 1982 Skinhead] confirmed just how seriously the toughs took their stitching. At times it reads like the shipping forecast: ‘Suit jackets single breasted, button three, very high buttoning – sometimes button four, or even button five. Ever increasing pocket flaps (up to 4 inches or beyond).’ Their trousers, worn short to display boots, lengthened from 18 inches in 1969 to 19ins or 20ins by 1971. Levis were dominant in London, but Wrangler, slightly wider and pre-shrunk, were big in the Midlands. The use of spattered bleach came in in 1969.

Ferguson’s guide also had an instructive list of ‘habits’. ‘Girls practising dance steps in twos at bus stops, with thumbs in the air… wearing hankies in the ends of your boots because you’d bought them two sizes too big… keeping your hands deep in your jeans pockets because your braces are too tight and your balls are separating… running in a clump through a crowded station, like the Bash Street Kids, keeping perfect time with chant and clap… having a fat youth in your crew…’

The skinhead revival came in with a darker shadow. ‘Paki bashing’, though not confined to skinheads, was prevalent, a gang mentality fuelled by unemployment and deprivation. And there was a fatal link with the Oi! movement, a fiercely working-class, predominantly East End collection of bands including the Cockney Rejects, Angelic Upstarts, Skrewdriver, the Last Resort and the 4-Skins. These were not media-friendly groups, and their confused disaffection swiftly transformed them – in the public eye at least – into a musical version of Alf Garnett: nationalistic, defensive, bunkered in with a victim mentality. Racist clashes marred several shows, a skinhead with a swastika appeared on the cover of a compilation album [Strength Through Oi!, compiled by the wanker Gary Bushell and released on Decca Records in 1981; it featured the very gay and very dead Nicky Crane on the front cover] and it became difficult to think of Oi! as anything beyond the soundtrack to the National Front [“They’re such a bunch of cunts”]. Many of the bands swung completely the other way – anti-racist, pro-Communist [sic] – but skinheads have always struggled with public relations. So Top Shop never embraced their wardrobe the way it did punk and the new romantics; the bigger bands skinheads followed, including Madness and Sham 69, were swift to disown them as soon as they became successful. In many ways, this was ideal; no one liked them and they didn’t care, or at least they didn’t care until they couldn’t move without police searches and accusations that they were all Nazis.

[Blah blah blah. See : Timothy S. Brown, ‘Subcultures, pop music and politics: skinheads and “Nazi rock” in England and Germany’, Journal of Social History, Vol.38, No.1, Fall 2004 (PDF).]

Shane Meadows’ film shares its title with an astute essay by the cultural critic Dick Hebdige. Its full title, This Is England And They Don’t Live Here, comes from a comment made by an East London skin called Mickey, a quote that began with the classic line, ‘Don’t get me wrong – I’ve got a lot of coloured friends. And they’re decent people. But they’ve got their own culture. The Pakistanis have a culture, it’s thousands of years old. But where’s our culture? Where’s the British culture?

Hebdige confirms that the stripped-down skinhead style was as self-conscious and studied as anything that had preceded it. ‘Just watch the way a skinhead moves. There is a lot of lapel twitching. The head twists out as if the skin is wearing an old-fashioned collar that’s too tight for comfort.’ He observed the cigarette tip turned inwards in the palm, brought down from the mouth in an exaggerated arc. He saw them always ‘jumping out of the frame’, alert to provocation and eager to defend what little they had (and what they perceived was being taken from them by Asians and other immigrants.)

These days Hebdige is a professor in the art and film studies departments at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and now he equates the stance adopted by skinheads in the late Seventies with a more recent phenomenon. ‘In the end,’ he tells me by email, ‘I think it’s about humiliation, to be frank: the matrix of humiliation is an obvious but all too often neglected condition that’s driving many of the more violent/extreme contemporary cultural and political phenomena in our era. I don’t think you can understand what motivates a Palestinian suicide bomber any more than you can a [Blood & Honour] Asian-stomping [bonehead] without taking humiliation into account as a major motivating factor.’

    “Most notably, ‘paki-bashing’ can be read as a displacement manouevre whereby the fear and anxiety produced by limited identification with one black group [on the part of white youths] was transformed into aggression and directed against another black community. Less easily assimilated than the West Indians into the host community… sharply differentiated not only by racial characteristics but by religious rituals, food taboos and a value system which encouraged deference, frugality and the profit motive, the Pakistanis were singled out for the brutal attentions of skinheads, black and white alike. Every time the boot went in, a contradiction was concealed, glossed over, made to ‘disappear’.” ~ Dick Hebdige, Subculture: The Meaning of Style, Routledge, London & New York, 1979, p.58.

Hebdige supports a theory put forward by the East End youth worker Phil Cohen: the original skinheads from the Sixties hankered for a traditionalist prewar Britain and the working-class lifestyle of their fathers, distantly wary of the new European alliances that threatened a magnificent isolation. In the second wave, nostalgia for a golden age was replaced by a desire to shock and bully, and to drink and laugh.

Hebdige says that these days ‘the style tends to look more like part of an international white power movement, though I may be wrong. It may well be a lot more complicated than that, but it’s certainly more difficult in 2007 than it was a few decades ago to adopt the skinhead style “innocently”, that is, without invoking the equation most everybody nowadays – white and non-white people alike – makes between skins and right-wing racist activism. Spectacular youth subcultures are all about bending signs this way or that, but my sense is you’d have to be really determined, really smart and really perverse nowadays to set out to appropriate skin style for something other than a xeno-homo-non-white-phobic ideology.’

    In which case, there’s a number of really determined, really smart and really perverse people out there. Alternatively, Hebidge is talking bullshit:

    SHARP [Skin Heads Against Racial Prejudice], and more importantly the SHARP attitude, has had a massive influence on Skinhead culture. Remember how it used to be back in the eighties when the Boneheads nearly strangled the cult. Remember how kids thought to be a Skinhead you had to be a Nazi. If it wasn’t for SHARP and other groups like AFA, ARA, RASH and all the rest we would be swimming in a sea of swastikas by now. Don’t listen to all the shit about splits and politics, the Boneheads go on about it because they know how we drove them underground and reclaimed Skinhead culture for true Skinheads. The non-politicals go on about it because it’s easier than taking on the scum. I’ve been a Skinhead since 1969 and I know what it’s meant since day one.” ~ Roddy Moreno, The Oppressed

    Priscilla Layne, Germany’s Other Skinheads, Deutsche Welle, October 16, 2004

‘I was so intense about being a skinhead, to me it was final,’ says Gavin Watson, a former skinhead from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. ‘Anybody who grew their hair for work or their girlfriend was severely mentally impaired. I would be downtown and see an older skin growing his hair for some reason or another, I would feel very disappointed. I could not understand how one could ever not be a skinhead once the step had been taken.’

Watson, who is 41, is a more reliable witness than most. On the floor of his Brighton flat is a large black case containing a few hundred photographs. ‘There are many, many more,’ he says. ‘I’ve got 5,000 printed and 10,000 in all.’ The living room windows are open with a view of the sea, and Watson is wearing an Adidas woollen cap and loose-fitting black work-out clothes. He is muscular, tattooed, and illustrates his speech with such animated, large hands that you think he may be wrestling an invisible animal. He calls his black case The Box of Death, and he goes through his photos with a mixture of delight and dread. ‘That’s John… that’s Lee… he went mad… he went off the rails on heroin. That’s Duncan. He died when a PA [an amplifier] fell on him.’

Watson says eight of his friends were dead by the time he was 23. By then his camera, an unwieldy Mamiya RB67 in brown and gold, was four years old, and paired with his Nikon had captured a scene in High Wycombe that Watson’s admirers claim to be the single most complete depiction of an English youth movement in existence.

Watson photographed from the inside, the only member of a provincial and isolated gang with a camera, only occasionally aware that his friends were part of a larger moment. His work shows a different view from the one we may be used to. Some of his photographs are funny, some are tender, some are domestic. Many of them show skinheads smiling, others display a great vulnerability: young boys struggling for their place in an adult world. If there is aggression it is playful and uncertain. And in the background sits an unbeautified England of the Eighties, a harsh depiction of extreme disunity.

‘That’s Neville, my brother,’ Watson says. ‘Three years younger. The girls thought he was the sweetest little thing, and I have to admit we used him as bait when we cruised round town. And I love this one,’ he says, holding an image of a young skinhead in a German uniform, Sieg-Heiling. ‘The odd thing is, one week before that he was a punk. I think there were only about 30 Nazi skinheads in London. But they tarred everything. Young skinheads were recruited by the BNP, but most weren’t because they didn’t care about politics. Skinheads just went where other skinheads went. If they voted at all, most voted Labour.’

Watson’s own skinhead allegiance began in 1979, when he was 14. He returned to his house after the usual post-school misbehaviour on his estate to find his parents watching Madness on Top of The Pops perform their single, ‘The Prince’. ‘I had to have that record,’ Watson remembers. ‘This guy here [he points to a black friend in a photograph] nicked it for me the next day, and I played it until it was worn. But if Madness had been mods I would have become a mod.’

He has written an unfinished account of his skinhead life, a vigorous record of his experiences with girls and violence and extreme boredom, and it contains several doomed attempts to explain the appeal. ‘I truly believed it was a way of life, and that being a skinhead was not just about clothes and style but something that went so deep, a connection. It’s like being in love: you just can’t explain it.’

Watson’s romanticism, unmissable in his photographs, permeates his written account. There are many schoolgirl crushes, and deep feelings of inadequacy. His parents were unhappy with their lives, and there is an unspoken quest for role models among his friends from abusive homes. His writing, available on his MySpace site, offers a raw and unexpected reflectiveness, and it brings an apology: ‘Well there I was,’ he writes, ‘surrounded by 50 Pakis with knives. I had a glue bag in one hand and a tool in the other, the swastika I had freshly tattooed on my head was still hurting a bit but I was ready for a ruck… There, that’s better, that should please the readers expecting stories of Nazi nights of passion, ultra violence and hard men who bowed to no one. Well I’m sorry, but I always looked upon myself as a shy, sensitive human being, who if I had the chance would have lived a more stress-free life, not needing to be tough, fight, feel scared most of the time. Damaged goods, that’s how I look at it.’

Some of Watson’s images are on show at the PYMCA Gallery in London, from 10 April. Others have been collected in a book called Skins, which is now out of print. Its mood has frequently been appropriated by other photographers and many magazines, to the point where the book has become a cult in itself. The hip [Australian slang for ‘yuppie’] youth culture magazine Vice recently commissioned Watson to take some new pictures, and introduced them thus: ‘We’ve always loved Watson’s photos and would often gaze out the window going, This guy is amazing and he hasn’t shot anything for years.’ The magazine asked him what he’d been doing since Skins. ‘The last eight years I’ve been in the pub,’ Watson said. ‘Thankfully I’m out of it now.’

His skinhead book was not the first. The celebrated fashion photographer Nick Knight took pictures in the East End, and their publication in the Omnibus Press book Skinhead, which also contained Dick Hebdige’s ‘This is England’ essay, was the cause of some resentment in High Wycombe. ‘[It was] a book I never really liked,’ Watson observes, ‘because I felt I had taken better photographs even though I was only 15. And also he wasn’t a real skin, [but] jumping on the bandwagon. Sour grapes on my part really.’

When skinheads grew their hair, Watson turned his camera towards the Summer of Love, but he knows that rave photographs will not be his legacy. He is now keen to take pictures of the Muslim skinheads of Malaysia. ‘I promise you they exist,’ he says. ‘I often think, how did we get from our little gang to this?’ Recently he has photographed some young skins in Southend, but they resemble a catwalk version of their inspiration: they are suedeheads at best. ‘What began as a style soon became a myth,’ Watson concludes. ‘And the myth soon became more convincing than the truth.’

[See also : Blackburn South Sharpies | Good Skinhead Music]

Boots and braces: Skinhead style

Dress
Skinheads took the Mod look (Ben Sherman shirts, Levi’s jeans) and toughened it with donkey jackets, army greens, Doc Marten boots and braces. Inspiration was also drawn from the long black coats and two-tone suits worn by Jamaican rude boys. [NB. Both Ben Sherman (a/k/a Arthur Bernard Sugarman, 1946–1987) and Levi Strauss (1847–1902) were Jewish.]

Hair
Early skinheads opted for the short-but-not-bald look, although suedeheads grew their hair longer and combed it, while later skins shaved their heads. Girls wore the Chelsea cut, short on top with fringes at the front, back and sides.

Music
Early skinheads listened to ska and rocksteady by Desmond Dekker [1941–2006], Laurel Aitken [1927–2005] and the [Skatalites]. British bands fusing Jamaican music and punk (The Specials, Madness) were big in the late 1970s before the more aggressive Oi! bands such as [the anti-racist] Blitz [1981–2007], [the anti-racist] The Business [1979–] and [the neo-Nazi] Skrewdriver [1976–1993] barged onto the scene.

Skins on screen
Made In Britain (Alan Clarke, 1982[3?])
Tim Roth’s searing performance as Trevor, a volatile 16-year-old with a swastika on his forehead, became symbolic of the darker edges of skinhead culture.

Romper Stomper (Geoffrey Wright, 1992)
Gritty portrait of a racist gang in [Footscray,] Melbourne, starring Russell Crowe, was meant to discourage neo-Nazism but [sic] became a skinhead cult classic.

American History X (Tony Kaye, 1998)
After a spell in prison for the murder of two black youths, skinhead Edward Norton struggles to distance his family from the white supremacist group of which he was a leading member.

The Believer (Henry Bean, 2001)
The twist in this riveting film about a violently anti-Semitic New York skinhead is that Danny Balint (played by Ryan Gosling) is himself Jewish.

[Skinhead Attitude and White Terror (Daniel Schweizer, 2003 and 2005)
Two documentary films by Swiss director Schweizer, the first providing an historical overview of skinhead culture, the second documenting the bonehead corruption of skinhead, in particular the boneheads associated with the neo-Nazi Blood & Honour network.]

    Real SkinheadStage Bottles

    Oi! You stupid bastards just wake up
    And think about
    Where your culture comes from
    Oi! It’s not just having fights
    Dancing and drinking
    Dressing up and owning many records

    Oi! It’s fighting back
    So you should feel
    Like a suburban rebel
    Oi! Social difference is the reason
    Employees are still exploited

    Real Skinhead

    Oi! Fred Perry was a Jew and Levi, too
    Black music
    The movement source
    Oi! Is kicking out the stupid racists
    So let the kids be united
    Oi! Don’t influence the younger ones
    By telling much
    Without saying anything
    Oi! Skinhead’s not a stupid culture
    Your’re not allowed
    To switch your brain off

    Real Skinhead

    Oi! You’re singing songs about a teenage warning
    About not showing the white flag
    Oi! Don’t talk about a way of life
    Though for you
    There’s no deeper meaning
    Oi! Is feeling pride
    But just posing
    Is no reason to be proud
    Oi! So skinhead is a different thing
    Your infiltration will be stopped

    Real Skinhead
    Oi!

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

Blood & Honour in Holland (and Australia)

In a noteworthy development sure to bring a tear to the eyes of local neo-Nazi supporters of Blood & Honour Australia — among them Welf Herfurth, David Innes, Paul Innes, James Newman, Douglas Schott and Ben Weerheym — members of the Dutch Parliament have announced their intention to outlaw the neo-Nazi group Blood & Honour in that country. Locally, while some few pseudo-‘punks’ clap and cheer Gary and B&H venue The Birmy, Yarra Council continues to do nothing regarding the presence of a fascist watering-hole in Fitzroy: — this despite the fact that a (black) woman was assaulted by boneheads on the night of their last shindig in September, 2006.

How ‘progressive’.

In the meantime, don’t be a scab, and ‘Boycott the Birmy’.

Parliament wants ban on Blood & Honour
Expatica
March 30, 2007

AMSTERDAM – A majority in Parliament, including the Christian Democrat CDA, the Socialist SP and the Freedom Party PVV, wants a ban on the extreme right-wing organisation Blood & Honour.

CDA MP Mirjam Sterk announced to Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin that her party would be submitting a motion for a ban. “As far as we are concerned it is an extremely dangerous organisation that must be banned,” she said on the current affairs programme EénVandaag [Video (Dutch)]. The SP supports the call for a ban but first wants to examine the legal possibilities for banning the group.

Blood & Honour is an international organisation of right-wing extremists [founded by Ian Stuart Donaldson]. Blood & Honour is thought to have about 200 members in the Netherlands.

The group organises white power concerts and neo-Nazi demonstrations. Germany was the first to prohibit the organisation in 2000 and Spanish authorities followed suit in 2006. Recent Belgian attempts to have the group banned have not yielded success so far.

In Australia, B&H is a tiny presence on the far right. Its growth in Holland and other parts of Europe, however, especially among white youth, has been greatly facilitated by the general climate of increased xenophobia. As noted by the MUA, a similar trend is evident in Australia, and — as also noted by the MUA in relation to the now-defunct youth wing of the fascist Australia First Party, the Patriotic Youth League — vigilance in combating the extreme right is called for.

    Oh, and speaking of which, and to conclude on a !cinataS note, a handful of youthful meatheads on Stormfront recently declared their intention to attend ‘Marxism Today’, a Socialist Alternative conference held this weekend at Trades Hall. As it happens, the Master Race was only able to assemble approximately 1 1/2 of its members to combat the rising tide of “skinny gooks” and “red scum” (etcetera, etcetera, etcetera), one teenage fascist impotently waving a flag in anger at the communist menace.
Posted in Anti-fascism, Music, State / Politics | 2 Comments

Human freedom versus ‘trade’: the hypocrisy and the stoopid

Some 231-year-old Yanqui imperialist running-dog reckons that something called ‘free trade’ is good, and something called ‘liberalism’ is bad: mmmkay? While in that tiny corner of the imaginary world neo-conservative bloggers inhabit such rhetoric is standard, what caught my attention is the following citation, sourced from some weird-arse site called ‘Discover the Networks’ (which appears to be some kinda side-project of the neo-con Frontpage online zine, the publication of crazed ex-Trotskyite businessman David Horowitz):

“Food Not Bombs” is an anti-war organization composed of more than 200 independent chapters… Since the 9/11 attacks, Food Not Bombs has denounced all U.S. military actions aimed at stopping the global threat of terrorism. The group condemns the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, and impugns the United States for bringing about “the globalization of the economy,” imposing “restrictions to the movements of people,” and contributing to “the destruction of the earth.” …FNB works in coalition with such groups as Earth First[!]; the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee; and the Anarchist Black Cross, which seeks to abolish the penal system and has called for “direct resistance to achieve a stateless and classless society.” FNB also has ties to the Communist organization Industrial Workers Of The World, a neo-Marxist group that embraces a radical form of socioeconomic anarchism. The Rochester, New York chapter of Food Not Bombs was a signatory to a May 30, 2000 document denouncing globalization and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The reality, of course, is a little different to the garbled account given above.

1) Food Not Bombs may be ‘anti-war’, but its principal activity is fairly straightforward, and that is the provision of free vegan food; which, it is argued, is preferable to blowing people up with bombs. (Neo-cons have often been known to dispute this.) And as noted, the 200+ ‘chapters’ of the group are autonomous (look it up in the dictionary), both structurally and politically. Further, the idea that “since 9/11” all the 200+ FNB groups in the world have “denounced all U.S. military actions aimed at stopping the global threat of terrorism” would, in reality — and minus the appellation “aimed at stopping the global threat of terrorism” — merely be in keeping with the general political tendency of the network. That is, ‘yes’ to food, ‘no’ to bombs: since about 1980. At the very least, that the US military machine’s objective is to ‘end terrorism’ is a matter for debate. (Hint: it’s not.)

As for the US state’s role in extending corporate globalisation, restricting human movement across state boundaries and destroying the world’s ecology, this is a matter of ongoing state policy and public record. With the exception of ecological destruction, it’s a remarkably stoopid thing to contradict what the US state itself loudly proclaims as being its objectives.

2) How exactly FNB works in ‘coalition’ with groups such as Earth First!, the LPDC or the ABC is carefully left unenunciated. In reality, and in addition to its regular street stalls, FNB provides food at events organised by a vast range of ‘progressive’ organisations, including but not limited to the above, and on the basis of the decisions made by the 200+ autonomous groups which compose the network.

    Note that the ABC, too, is a network of autonomous groups. (In the US, there is a division between two tendencies, the Federation and the Network, presumably concerning the proper focus of their work.) Its history — to the extent that contemporary formations may be linked to these earlier ones — dates back to the early 1900s, when it was known as the Anarchist Red Cross; a break-away faction of the Political Red Cross formed when it was discovered that the latter group was neglecting to provide material support to anarchist prisoners. The repression of anarchists in Russia by the Bolsheviks during and in the years following their assumption of state power in 1917 was a principal focus of the group’s work. Given the success of the Bolsheviks in destroying the anarchist movement in the territories under its control — alongside of the successful repression of anarchist movements elsewhere — the ABC went into decline. Its revival was triggered by the re-emergence of a new generation in the 1960s, and this new generation’s activities centred on assisting anarchists in Francoist Spain. For more on the ABC, see Albert Meltzer, I couldn’t paint golden angels, Chapter XIII.

3) The IWW is neither Communist nor “a neo-Marxist group that embraces a radical form of socioeconomic anarchism”, as any literate 12-year-old could tell you. What it is is more or less what it says it is, a ‘union for all workers’. That is, a union which aims to organise all workers on the basis of industry, rather than trade, and which has as its overall objective the abolition of (global) capitalism. ‘Instead of the conservative motto, “A fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work”, we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary watchword, “Abolition of the wage system”.’ In short, a revolutionary industrial union.

The IWW also has a long history, which it is in fact possible to study. Unfortunately, to do so requires both the ability to read and the ability to think, neither of which abilities are in abundance among neo-cons. Filthy lucre, on the other hand…

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, History, State / Politics, War on Terror | 3 Comments

Pickled brains, disembraining machines, and dead and imprisoned journalists

Brains. Pickled Brains.

Pickled brain to return to village
Malcolm Moore
Telegraph
March 29, 2007

The pickled brain of a 19th-century Italian anarchist, which has been on display in a glass jar in Rome since his death, is finally set to return home.

Giovanni Passannante, a cook, gained notoriety for lunging at Umberto I, the king of Italy, with a three-inch kitchen knife during a royal visit to Naples in 1878.

The then 28-year-old Passannante missed his target, and gouged the prime minister instead. He was arrested and sent to the prison island of Elba. After a decade of solitary confinement, he was judged to be insane and was transferred to an asylum.

When he died in 1910, his body was fed to pigs [thus, while simultaneously demonstrating the depravity of everyday life in penal Italy, also providing the inspiration for Mason Verger‘s failed attempt to feed Hannibal Lecter to the pigs in Hannibal (1999)] but his brain was preserved so that it could be studied for signs of innate criminality.

[Presumably along the squiggly lines established by the brilliant Italian scientician Cesare Lombroso, whose tract on ‘The Physiognomy of the Anarchists’ (1891) is a deadset classic of the genre. In Russia, Vlad the Impaler‘s brain was also preserved by ‘Soviet’ scienticians in the hope that placing the goo under the microscope might unlock the secrets to his own peculiar ‘genius’. (The study was also the subject of an acerbic poem, ‘Room 19’, by Jon Hillson.)]

The brain is currently on view at Rome’s crime museum, but will be transported to his home town of Savoia di Lucania, in the deep south of the country, on May 11.

However, the return of the brain is no guarantee that Passannante will rest in peace.

The local mayor, Rosina Ricciardi, wants to display the brain in its jar, rather than giving it a proper burial. She said it would be a boost for tourism. Francesco Rutelli, the culture minister, reprimanded her, asking her to find a “dignified” solution.

“I am convinced we must immediately give some peace to the mortal remains of Passannante,” he said.

In turn, his intervention has outraged Italy’s small group of hardcore monarchists.

Sergio Boschiero, their leader, said: “What does Rutelli want with these remains? Does this brain represent part of our cultural heritage?

“Do we want to make this man the equal of Padre Pio or Guglielmo Marconi? What sort of example does he set for the new generation, this man who tried to kill a head of state?”

Giuseppe Galzerano, the author of a biography of Passannante, also said the brain should not be buried.

“It would represent a brutal and uncivil attempt to wipe clean a page of our history,” he said.

“The brain should be kept on display as a permanent memory of the injustice undergone by one man at the hands of the royal family.”

Passannante wasn’t the only man to try to kill the King: another anarchist, Pietro Umberto Acciarito (1871–1943) also attempted to stab Umberto, on April 22, 1897. However, “When Umberto saw the weapon, he stood up and moved far enough away in the carriage that Acciarito could not reach him. Acciarito tried to stab Umberto anyway, but his knife struck harmlessly against the vehicle. Acciarito then proceeded to carve a letter A and a cross in the side of the carriage.” Three years later, Umberto I finally kicked his gold-and-diamond-encrusted bucket when another anarchist, Gaetano Bresci (1869–1901), taking advantage of modern technology, shot the bastard dead with a revolver.

Machines. Disembraining machines.

Speaking of brains, some punks got theirs pickled in jars; reportedly as a result of shoving their heads into the disembraining machines kindly provided for their enthusiastic use by the caring salesman of global corporate culture. Rather than gratefully receiving pats on the head from neo-Nazis, however, some punks fight back — and pay the price. In Mexico recently:

On the night of March 23, four young people associated with the anarchist punk fanzine Pensares Y Sentires were arbitrarily attacked, beaten and detained by police on the outskirts of Oaxaca City. The black-clad attackers, who repeatedly fired their pistols in the air to intimidate the youths, belonged to the municipal police force of Santa Lucia del Camino, the Oaxaca district where Indymedia [journalist] Brad Will was killed last year. The detainees were taken to the Santa Lucia del Camino jail, and released at 1:30 AM, charged with disorderly conduct. Two days earlier, they had [participated] in the ceremony and hunger strike to demand [that] Brad’s killers be brought to justice. The detained were also members of the local Somos Resistencia collective, part of the Anarkalactica youth culture network.

Journalists. Dead and imprisoned journalists.

In Barcelona, Spain, Martinus Hendrikus Tega, a former Dutch squatter, has been arrested and has allegedly confessed to the assassination in November 2005 of Dutch journalist Louis Sévèke, a killing which received barely a fraction of the attention paid to the murder in November 2004 of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, or that of fascist politician Pim Fortuyn in May 2002 (‘Confession and arrest in Sévèke murder’, DutchNews.nl, March 28, 2007). The report notes that Sévèke “was well-known in left-wing and squatter circles and a variety of reasons have been put forward for the shooting. Some suggest it may have been connected to his research into the secret service”. The alleged killer’s motive is claimed by police to have been revenge for Sévèke’s ‘outing’ of him as a police informant in the 1990s, a claim based on the alleged contents of Tega’s diaries, uncovered by police through their investigations into a number of armed robberies also allegedly committed by Tega. Family and friends of Sévèke dispute this claim.

Australian corporate/state media have been following Sévèke’s case as closely as they have that of imprisoned US journalist Josh Wolf, most recently taking note of the Committee to Protect Journalists‘s March 29 call for his release: ‘”We look at this issue from a global perspective,” noted CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. “If Wolf had been doing what he was doing in China, or Uzbekistan, or Zimbabwe instead of San Francisco there would be no question about his journalistic credentials.”‘

For a sample of their intensive coverage, see the links below:

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, History, Media, Music, State / Politics, War on Terror | 1 Comment

You beauty!

GO PIES!

Collingwood (12.10.82) v. Kangaroos (10.19.79)

Good old Collingwood forever,
They know how to play the game.
Side by side they stick together,
To uphold the Magpies’ name.

See the barrackers are shouting,
As all barrackers should.
Oh, the premiership’s a cakewalk,
For the good old Collingwood.

(Repeat one miilion times)

PS. Thanks Shannon!

Posted in Collingwood | 11 Comments