Bolsheviks. National Bolsheviks.

So, like, there’s this mob in Russia called the National Bolshevik Party.

It’s got a leader and everything: Eduard Limonov.

Limonov and the NBP have recently come to the attention of the corporate / state media as a result of their participation in Garry Kasparov‘s anti-Putin coalition, ‘The Other Russia’ (which may, in some ways, be considered a deradicalised version of the Zaps’ La Otra Campaña).

‘The Other Russia’ is a liberal coalition formed during last July’s G8 summit in St. Petersburg which aims at “the construction of a new democratic state of Russia under the rule of law”. A significant, if not necessarily radical shift, given that the state is effectively operating as a dictatorship and the rule of law is effectively subsumed by the law of the market.

But who is Eduard Limonov? And who are the National Bolsheviks?

The answers to these questions appear to have created a good deal of ideological confusion; for journalists in particular. Thus:

Luke Harding in The Guardian in Moscow (Supreme court ban on liberal party wipes out opposition to Putin, March 29, 2007) writes that:

On Thursday Moscow’s prosecutor’s office also suspended the Nationalist Bolshevik party, another radical and previously banned anti-Kremlin group. The National Bolshevik party is a radical activist group that has been a driving force behind recent anti-government protests, as the country prepares for parliamentary elections in December and next year’s presidential vote.

Carlin Romano, book critic for The Philadelphia Inquirer, uses Tom Stoppard’s The Coast of Utopia as a springboard for an inquiry into the nature of Russia’s contemporary intelligentsia (Russia’s culturati a pale imitation of worthies of ‘Utopia’, April 1, 2007):

Novelist Eduard Limonov (It’s Me, Eddie) — a onetime emigré, founder of Russia’s fascistic National Bolshevik Party, denounced by Solzhenitsyn as “a little insect who writes pornography” — opposes Putin, but from a militant, nationalist, gangster-worshipping mentality that recalls the worst of 19th-century Slavophilia.

Fred Weir, on the other hand, writes of “the leftist National Bolshevik Party, led by novelist Eduard Limonov” (Ex-Chess Champ Runs Risky Anti-Putin Game Plan, Christian Science Monitor, April 8, 2007). Interestingly, in the same article Weir writes that “To support his contention that Russia has become a police state, Kasparov points to harassment of Other Russia activists. He is not the only one to report similar treatment at the hands of police bearing lists of names, addresses, and workplaces of targeted political dissidents. [Marxist intellectual] Boris Kagarlitsky, an organizer of a social forum during the G8 summit in St. Petersburg last July, says “about 300 of our invited participants were pulled off trains and buses or prevented from leaving their home towns. Some had their documents destroyed by police”.”

NewsCorpse, in the person of employee Sebastian Smith in Moscow writes (Chess champ plots next move in Putin game, April 15, 2007):

The Other Russia, which [Kasparov] helped found, includes figures as disparate as a little-loved former premier Mikhail Kasyanov, the enigmatic writer and radical left leader Eduard Limonov, and a series of youth groups.

MSNBC (Financial Times) takes up a contrary position to Mr. Smith, describing Limonov as the “leader of the right-wing National Bolshevik party” (Anti-Putin protests spread to St Petersburg, April 15, 2007). Steve Gutterman of The Associated Press hedges his bets, describing Limonov as simply “head of the banned National Bolshevik Party and widely known for his novels and provocative sense of political theatre” (Russian riot police clash with opposition supporters, Toronto Globe & Mail, April 15, 2007). In The Newspaper of Record Andrew E. Kramer puts it on record that Limonov is a novelist and the NBP “is known for its acts of civil disobedience and… has been banned by the government as an extremist group” (Opposition Rally in Russia Halted by Police for 2nd Day, The New York Times, April 16, 2007).

Finally, four days after AP described Limonov as ‘theatrical’, it supplements this characterisation by naming him an “irreverent ultra-nationalist” (Russia restricts dissent, Chicago Daily-Herald, April 19, 2007). In a longer discussion in The Spectator (April 21, 2007), Putin will stop at nothing according to Anne Applebaum, while Limonov is “a writer and ex-punk rocker whose National Bolshevist [?] Party [is] best known for thuggishness and stunts“. James Heartfield — some twat who writes for the online journal of the former Marxists-for-rent otherwise known as Spiked — provides the most caustic assessment (A new Russian revolution? Get real, April 16, 2007):

The punk-existentialist author turned extreme nationalist leader, Eduard Limonov, has brought his tinpot National Bolshevik party on-board — giving them a greater sense of purpose than their previous campaigns to hold a church congregation hostage with a fake grenade, and organise a Russian army to invade Kazakhstan. (Limonov, who volunteered as a sniper for the Serb Republican Army in the Bosnian civil war, has the copyright on Another Russia — it’s the title of his personal manifesto).

So, Limonov is a little enigmatic irreverent ultra-nationalist radical leftist Russian Slavophilic insect and ex-punk rocker with a provocative sense of political theatre and a militant, gangster-worshipping mentality who writes existentialist pornographic novels. The NBP, on the other hand, is a banned radical fascistic leftist right-wing anti-government extremist tinpot group, known for its acts of civil disobedience, but best known for its thuggishness and political stunts.

Any more questions?

Posted in Anti-fascism, Media, State / Politics | 2 Comments

“Go Nazis!”; or “Do you understand bloody English?”

Simon Christian, 21, an economics student at Deakin University, and the first of three members of the Ocean Grove Football Club facing charges over a racist assault on a Jewish man, Menachem Vorchheimer, on October 14 last year, pled guilty April 18 to ‘using insulting words in a public place’, and has been convicted and fined $1,000. Two other players are still to face court. Matthew Cuthbert, 23, played 12 matches for the club last year and averaged 11.4 possessions. He’s charged with intentionally causing injury, recklessly causing injury, assault and using insulting words in a public place, and is due to face court on June 14. James Dalton, 28, played 19 games last year, and led the team in disposals (443 kicks, 192 handballs). Dalton was also Bellarine Football League’s 2006 best and fairest winner. He’s charged with one count of theft and is scheduled to appear in court on June 13 for a mention.

Ocean Grove Football Club has issued a statement on the ‘Vorchheimer Matter’:

    On the 8/3/07 the Club’s committee met in the light of police charges now laid against 3 of its players. The Club is currently considering all matters relating to the alleged offences. The Club advises that it will be making no further public comment in the matter until the court case for each player is completed.

A pity the club didn’t treat its players to a nice big cup of shut the fuck up six months ago eh?

See also : A Day At The Racists (October 18, 2006); The future of policing? (November 29, 2006); Racism and fascism, punks and police: here and there, now and then… (March 7, 2007).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fascism in Serbia, Russia…

‘Attacks in Serbia raise fear of a return to extremism’
[AP]
International Herald Tribune
April 17, 2007

BELGRADE: Serbia has been struck by a string of attacks against government critics that is fueling concerns of a possible explosion of ultranationalist sentiment as Kosovo moves toward independence.

Many people, including the country’s pro-Western president, Boris Tadic, even warn of a return to the days of violence and turmoil under Slobodan Milosevic, the late president.

In recent weeks, unknown assailants have thrown grenades at a journalist’s home, made death threats against a reporter, tossed bricks into an opposition politician’s living room and ransacked the offices of a Muslim party.

“What year are we in?” said Marija Pavlovic, a 40-year-old doctor. “I really thought all this was behind us.”

Her fears have found a voice on the Internet.

“All this is just the same as seven or eight years ago,” a person who gave the name Dusan Nedeljkovic wrote on a blog. “I want to know who is responsible and when all this is going to end.”

Western support for Kosovo self-rule and a United Nations plan granting supervised independence have unleashed a wave of anti-Western rhetoric among conservative politicians; some have even called for abandoning Serbia’s bid for membership in the European Union or cutting diplomatic ties with Western countries.

That has all fed the nationalist furor.

Liberals in Serbia were particularly alarmed this past weekend when two hand grenades exploded at the bedroom window of an independent journalist, Dejan Anastasijevic, hurting no one but causing extensive damage to his home.

“I never thought it would come to this,” said Anastasijevic, who once testified at the Milosevic genocide trial at the UN war crimes tribunal. “I’m in shock.”

The bombing of Anastasijevic’s home came just days after a neo-Nazi group posted death threats on the Internet [that is, Scumfront] against another independent journalist in the north.

    ‘SERBIA: Neo-Nazis threaten to kill independent journalist’, Committee to Protect Journalists, New York, April 3, 2007 : “The Committee to Protect Journalists is alarmed by death threats made against Dinko Gruhonjic, head of the Vojvodina branch of the independent news agency BETA and chairman of the Independent Journalists’ Association of Vojvodina, by a local neo-Nazi group.

    The threats, which were posted on a neo-Nazi Web site this week, stem from Gruhonjic’s coverage of National Formation, a neo-Nazi group based in the northern Serbian city of Novi Sad, the journalist told CPJ. Gruhonjic’s reports publicized the group’s activities, including a 2005 organized attack where neo-Nazis armed with crowbars attacked participants marking the anniversary of Kristallnacht — a pogrom against Jews throughout Germany and parts of Austria in 1938 — according to local and international press reports…”

The group’s [bonehead] members stood in military formation wearing black shirts and waving Serbian flags in a protest last month on Belgrade’s main square, vowing never to give up Kosovo. The police did not intervene.

    Much like their counterparts in Russia:

    ‘As Police Beat “Other Russia” Marchers, Moscow Officials Allowed Illegal Antisemitic Rally’
    UCSJ
    April 17, 2007

    The same day that Moscow police savagely beat protesters from “Other Russia” and illegally detained dozens of participants in that non-violent demonstration, an anti-Semitic rally was allowed to go forward in another part of the city without any interference from the police, despite the fact that it featured several statements that violate Russia’s hate speech laws. According to an April 1, 2007 report by the Sova Information-Analytical Center, around 400 extreme nationalists [ie, fascists] rallied in Moscow that day under the slogan “Moscow is a [ethnic] Russian City”…

    [See photo of a Russian fascist at April 1 demonstration in Moscow holding a sign of a man with a Star of David around his neck holding up a severed Russian head. Slogan reads: “Russian! Help a Russian or you’ll be next!”]

In another incident last week, three men wearing T-shirts with the image of the fugitive war crimes suspect Ratko Mladic broke into the offices of a Muslim-led party in Belgrade, shouting insults and telling party activists to leave Serbia.

And on March 1, a brick was thrown into the home of a liberal politician, Vesna Pesic, one of the founders of Serbia’s antiwar movement and a former ambassador to Mexico. There were no injuries.

“Such crimes are attempts to return Serbia to the 1990s and the era of wars,” Tadic warned.

“But we must not, at any price, give up our goal of building a democratic society. The reaction of the state must be the harshest possible.”

Despite promises of a crackdown, critics claim that the post-Milosevic authorities, especially the current conservative government, have not done enough to sideline nationalist groups following Milosevic’s fall from power in 2000.

The critics argue that the failure of the government to decisively distance itself from the Milosevic era and arrest Mladic and others charged with war crimes was encouraging the extremist groups.

“Recent attacks are a consequence of the political climate in the country,” said Natasa Kandic, a leading human rights activist in Serbia who has won international praise for her efforts to expose the war crimes committed during the Balkan wars.

Vojin Dimitrijevic, another human rights activist and international law expert said that “large parts of our political elite have been sending signals” in support of the nationalist organizations.

Cedomir Jovanovic, leader of the Liberal Party and the only leading Serbian politician supporting independence for Kosovo, said official policies offered a green light for a “lynching of all those who think differently than the quasi-reformers.”

Pesic, an ally of Jovanovic, agreed that the Kosovo dispute had revived Milosevic-era divisions. “Once again,” she said, “we are being divided into patriots and traitors.”

    See also : Sindikalna konfederacija Anarho-sindikalistička inicijativa (Union Confederation / Anarcho-Syndicalist Initiative); Neo-Nazi and fascist attack on IAS members in 2 cities, July 22, 2002 (“This two examples show that rise of extreme right in Serbia is not an “illusion” and “nonsense” as many of the media here are trying to present. Fascist and Nazis are raving out here and we have to be ready for a fight with them in every moment! Long live class war!”); Studentski protest 2007 : Dole školarine!. Note that the ASI-IWA has played an important role in the recent series of student protests, blockades and occupations mounted in opposition to the neoliberal destruction of the tertiary education sector. Among the many who’ve taken part is Ratibor Trivunac, currently the General Secretary of the IWA. And like Dinko Gruhonjic, Rata’s status as a troublemaker has brought him to the attention of fascists on Stormfront, if not the corporate/state media.
Posted in Anarchism, Anti-fascism, State / Politics, Student movement, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Men in Viking Hats!

April 20 is a very special date on the neo-Nazi calendar, and cause for very special celebrations. In Australia, it means that the usual motley assortment of racist losers — whether in Canberra, or Melbourne, or Perth, or Sydney, or elsewhere — will gather to make a toast to Der Führer… and to pray that Dane Sweetman doesn’t decide to gatecrash the party.

In New Zealand / Aotearoa, on April 21, Douglas Schott will be entertaining the volk of Wellington with his band, Blood Red Eagle (a band which, incidentally, Charter 77 gigged with in Sydney — which fact, in addition to The Birmy being the band’s favourite venue, helps explain why they regard opposition to neo-Nazi infiltration of the local music scene to be worthy of nothing other than derision, and have done since The Birmy’s (continuing) status as a neo-Nazi venue was first brought to their attention in 2002). Schott’s Viking-inspired warblings in praise of all things Nordic (like worshipping at the feet of deceased incestuous coprophiliac dictators while wearing funny hats) has experienced a slight hiccup, however, with members of the Satan’s Slaves MC apparently deciding that their clubhaus in Wellington is simply too sexy / too sexy for Blood Red Eagle. If correct, this means that the Beagle Boys (certainly not to be confused with Banda Bassotti) will likely be playing in someone’s backyard.

And as for the gig scheduled for Upper Hutt on April 20… who knows?

In Russia, April 20 means a sharp escalation in otherwise routine patterns of bonehead thuggery and murder. And when it comes to racist violence, according to the UCSJ:

…April 2006 will go on record as the bloodiest month in recent Russian history, with at least seven murders and more than a dozen assaults attributed to neo-Nazi groups.

Since the late 1990s, Russia’s homegrown fascists have spent the days surrounding April 20 stepping up their year-round campaign of violence against dark-skinned ethnic minorities, foreign students (predominantly from developing countries), and Jews…

Throughout April 2006, Russian neo-Nazi web sites brazenly called for more violence against minorities to mark Hitler’s birthday and even posted a how-to manual with advice on how to evade arrest afterward. At the same time, neo-Nazis interviewed by foreign correspondents in Krasnoyarsk and Moscow claimed that elements within law enforcement agencies are working to support, rather than suppress, their activities. This unconfirmed claim bolsters a conspiracy theory [?] circulated by many human rights activists and both liberal and Communist politicians, the gist of which is that the Russian government is secretly backing neo-Nazi groups and xenophobic political parties like Motherland and Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s LDPR in order to build up a “fascist threat” that can be used at the end of President Putin’s term in 2008 to justify emergency measures to continue his rule…

Yeah. How outlandish.

In other news:

‘Hungarian motorway blocked by escaping rabbits’
April 16, 2007

BUDAPEST (Reuters) – Hungary’s busiest highway, connecting Budapest with the Austrian capital Vienna, was closed early on Monday after a truck carrying rabbits [to the slaughterhouse] crashed, letting 5,000 of the animals loose on the road, police said.

The M1 motorway was closed around 40 km (25 miles) west of Budapest and could remain closed for hours while police try to capture the escaped animals, highway police spokeswoman Viktoria Galik said.

“There are thousands of them on the road but they’re not using their newfound freedom well; they’re just sitting around, eating grass and enjoying the sun,” Galik told Reuters.

SMASH FASCISM! FREE THE RABBITS!

Posted in !nataS, Anti-fascism, History, Music, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Is it ‘cos I is (wearing) black?

    Above : Another stylish anarchist youth from Chile in Melbourne black (Image stolen from Bombs & Shields)

US Gub’mint spooks have been Breaking the Law! Breaking the Law! again — and just for good measure, have been caught with their pants on fire while doing so. Judging by their I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E., let’s hope that they don’t pay a side-trip to Melbourne when Bush comes to shove in Sydney in September, or a great number of local residents will be reaching for the sky (while hurriedly trying to disassociate themselves from a revolutionary opposition to capital and state).

Judge Weighs Punishing City Lawyers Over Delay on Protest Log
Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post
April 13, 2007

A federal judge said yesterday he was “deeply concerned” about newly revealed evidence that FBI I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. agents interrogated war protesters about their political views at a Washington rally in April 2002 and was seriously considering sanctioning D.C. government lawyers for insisting for three years that they had no record of the FBI’s involvement.

The D.C. attorney general’s office surprised the court March 23 by reporting that it had found a D.C. police log from the day of the rally — the same log city attorneys had repeatedly said did not exist since protesters sued the D.C. police in 2003. The heavily redacted document confirmed that FBI I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. officers were with D.C. police at a downtown parking garage April 20, 2002, and were directly involved in the questioning of 23 protesters later arrested for trespassing.

Yesterday, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ordered the city to explain within the next week why it took so long to find a log that the police department routinely maintains during protests and why several attorneys had said it didn’t exist. He also ordered the FBI to immediately begin looking more deeply for records of its presence and role in the incident.

Protesters claim in the suit that their constitutional rights to free speech were violated and that they were illegally detained on the pretext of trespassing. Protesters said plainclothes FBI agents who did not identify themselves asked them one by one while being videotaped about their political and religious beliefs and their associates in protest groups.

The FBI considered them suspicious because they wore black clothes, the log shows, a color the FBI associated with anarchist groups

Similar semi-incomprehension is displayed by a hack writing for The Santiago Times on the subject of Chilean youth and its discontents (Nathan Crooks, ‘Chile’s Disaffected Youth Turn To Street Violence’, April 14, 2007). Three successive waves of protest — revolting students in May 2006, rioting on the anniversary of Pinochet’s 1973 coup (and on news of his death in December), and, most recently, in March — mean that “[t]o the world, a normally safe, business-orientated city looked like a war zone”.

Driving the trend is an increasingly disenfranchised youth, most of whom use the Internet to communicate and have no specific goals other than a shared resentment of society in general. A lax judicial system and increased media coverage are making the problem worse…

Jorge Lizama, a 19-year-old high school dropout, anarchist, and animal-rights activist, has emerged as a poster child in Chile’s current street struggles. He was arrested late last month for attacking the car of Justice Minister Gloria Chevesich during the March 29 protests and is also… accused of tossing a Molotov cocktail at the La Moneda Presidential Palace last year…

Lizama… came to feel at home with the many anarchist groups that operate in Chile. Using mostly the Internet to communicate, Chile’s anarchists are not organized [sic], are without leaders, and have no hierarchy. The only thing that unites them is a shared discontent with society.

“These kids are hostile to the system, and they feel threatened and excluded,” said Roberto Méndez, the president of survey firm Adimark. “They take their anger out on anything that represents the system, such as the Transantiago, and they are most aggressive towards the left wing sectors of the governing Concertación coalition because they feel they sold out to the current model.”

…Some suggest that Chile’s media is also inciting the violence. After the March 29 protests, Interior Minister Belisario Velasco blamed several television programs for promoting the violence. “A lot of the content on TV was almost a call to violence,” he said in a conversation with Radio Cooperativa. Both print and television media gave widespread coverage to the impending protests, and on March 29, one channel broadcast the live looting of a grocery store in Santiago.

Chile’s legal system is also a problem. Prosecutors must not only prove that the accused committed a violent crime, but also that they intended to commit the crime. When apprehended, most minors are released to their parents as it is assumed that they are incapable of criminal intent. Many bands of youth organize their protests so that only minors commit violent acts to take advantage of the system.

But the free pass may soon be over. Bachelet will sign legislation in June removing the requirement to prove intent in crimes committed by youth, and she is also floating legislation to hold parents legally responsible for the crimes their children commit.

While Bachelet’s firm hand has been applauded by many, it may be too little or too late. Méndez said that Chile’s students are angrier this year than ever and that university students are now joining what were once high school protests. “The risk of another student conflict, one more powerful than last year, is extremely high,” he said. “Chile has changed since last year, and respect for authority has declined. As was the case before, the situation is preventable. But it remains to be seen if the government will take appropriate measures to deactivate the movement or if the situation will be allowed to turn into the third, and possibly fatal, crisis of Bachelet’s presidency.

And on a final, black, !cinataS note, ‘Colonel’ William Hoff (‘Wild Bill’) of the US-based neo-Nazi NSM (who did an Ian Stuart last December), “took a secret with him to the grave, one he couldn’t share with his NSM buddies. Wild Bill, an icon of white supremacy, was himself part black” (Robert W. Dalton, ‘A force in NSM’, Spartanburg Herald-Journal, April 15, 2007).

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

GO Pies!

Yes! After we was robbed last week by the drug-fuelled Weasels (soaring high on Godwin-knows-what) and their comrades the white rabbits (adjudicating under the influence of mInD-aLtErInG substances), the Mighty Magpies have returned to the winner’s list and defeated the toys from Tigerland.

Poor Richmond. Tom Hafey:

“I can remember Richmond people would always say, ‘I don’t care where we finish on the ladder as long as we beat Collingwood’,” Hafey says.

“I even had people on the board saying that to me when I was coach. I can remember people saying ‘as long as we beat those mongrels that’s all we care about’.

“That’s how they viewed it at the club. And particularly the dEmEnTeD supporters. They just hated Collingwood with a passion.”

Losers.

After a mediocre first half, Collingwood came good in the second, drawing even with the rabble known as Richmond by three-quarter time, and then proceeding to kick away in the final quarter to eventually win by 25 points — a 47 point turnaround. In other good news, three players made exciting debuts for the Pies: West Australians Shannon Cox, Brad Dick and Alan Toovey.

The comeback victory, in front of a crowd of 70,569, was all the more meritorious for the Magpies given they achieved it with a side light on experience.

Collingwood coach Mick Malthouse said the first-game players all “held up very well” and was also happy to single out Rocca for praise, saying even though he was quiet in the first half, he had attacked the football hard.

“When you lose your captains, he’s a very important player for us and he deserves the accolades that have been given to him,” he said.

Veteran defender James Clement was withdrawn from the side just 20 minutes before the opening bounce, after vomiting during the warm-up, to join injured skipper Nathan Buckley, Ben Johnson and Alan Didak on the sidelines…

Clement’s absence was sorely felt as Richmond burst out of the blocks, booting four goals in a seven-minute burst to establish a 19-point lead 12 minutes into the match, with Jay Schulz kicking two goals and Matthew Richardson and Kayne Pettifer one each.

Even that margin did not fully reflect the dominance they were enjoying in attack, with Richardson missing two fairly simple shots after marking early in the game. ~ AAP, ‘Rocca turns it on as Magpies storm home’, The Age, April 13, 2007

How we laughed.

Collingwood 17.13 (115) def. Richmond 13.12 (90)

Posted in Collingwood, Poetry | 1 Comment

Another Evil & Dangerous Woman Does Not Pass Go, Does Not Collect $200

[Update : Ex-member of German far-left group gets suspended sentence for failed bombings, AP, International Herald Tribune, April 16, 2007; Radical Left-Wing Feminist Given Suspended Jail Term, Deutsche Welle, April 16, 2007; Tony Paterson, Germany’s ‘Red Zora’ terrorist spared jail, The Independent, April 17, 2007: “Prosecutors agreed to a minimum sentence, mainly because unlike Germany’s other 1970s left-wing terrorist gangs, Red Zora successfully ensured that no one was harmed in the 45 attacks the organisation carried out between 1977 and 1995… Gershäuser left court yesterday to resume a normal life, her militant past a tiny footnote in history. Yet Red Zora’s reputation seems destined to live on. Montenegro, a state newly emerged from the tragedy of the Balkans, has made the story of the daring orphan girl [and source of the group’s name from the 1941 book Die rote Zora und ihre Bande by Kurt Held] the subject of its first full-length feature film. It is due to reach cinema screens this autumn.” See also : Red Dawns, a “non-hierarchical, non-exploitational and anti-capitalist” women’s festival (also) newly emerged from the ‘tragedy’ of the Balkans…]

Last month, Brigitte Mohnhaupt, a former member of Germany’s Red Army Faction, was released from jail after spending 24 years behind bars for her involvement in a number of attentats. Today-ish, Adrienne Gerhäuser, a former member of another German group, Rote Zora, goes to trial after turning herself in to German police in December last year, after many years on the run:

‘Former Left-Wing Extremist Tried For Failed Attacks in 1980s’
Deutsche Welle
April 11, 2007

…The 58-year-old defendant… presented a statement saying that she had “knowingly and willingly” attempted to bomb the Berlin Genetic Technical Institute in 1986 and a clothing factory in Bavaria in 1987 on behalf of the far-left organization Rote Zora.

She said the attacks were motivated by her political beliefs at the time, including a fierce opposition to genetic engineering and solidarity with striking female factory workers in South Korea.

Gerhäuser said she had provided alarm clocks for two detonators. But in both cases the devices failed to go off and no one was injured.

She stands accused of belonging to a terrorist organization and attempting bombing.

The Berlin court said that because Gerhäuser had turned herself in to the authorities late last year, the maximum penalty she would face would be [a] two-year suspended sentence.

Rote Zora was a women’s splinter group that claimed responsibility for 45 bombings and cases of arson between April 1977 and February 1988 with the aim of bringing about radical change in German society.

The group was part of the so-called Revolutionary Cells network until 1986…

According to another report in The Guardian (Kate Connolly, ‘Militant feminist on trial after 20 years on run’, April 12, 2007):

Edith Lunnebach, Gershäuser’s lawyer, told a German newspaper that her client wanted to make clear to the court “that the political connections which existed then no longer exist”, and that she no longer supported them. Her client would not express remorse, and she had given herself up because she wanted to “bring to an end the situation of illegality which had become a burden”.

Despite Connolly’s assurances that “Rote Zora is now little more than a footnote in the history of leftwing German terrorism”, what’s really interesting is the fact that she fingers Thomas Kram, “a leading member of the Revolutionary Cells” and Gerhäuser’s partner in crime, love and flight, as being responsible not only for “kidnappings, shootings and hijackings”, but “the bomb attack on Bologna station in August 1980 in which 85 people were killed”.

Which is very fucking odd.

‘Italy: Terror on the Right’
Thomas Sheehan
The New York Review of Books
January 22, 1981

Bologna, August 2, 1980. It was a hot Saturday morning, the first weekend of Italy’s traditional holiday month, and thousands of vacationers jostled their way to and from the trains in Bologna’s central railroad station. In the midst of that noisy crowd someone stopped midway between the second-class waiting room and the coffee bar, put down a heavy suitcase, and quickly left the station. The suitcase contained over forty pounds of explosives, perhaps stable nitroglycerine, connected to a timer. At exactly 10:25 AM it exploded, ripping through the crowd, tearing apart the reinforced concrete walls, and bringing the roof crashing down on hundreds of bodies and parts of bodies.

In the bloody aftermath, rescue squads worked for over twelve hours to pull the dead and maimed from the rubble. As they labored, a young neofascist entered a telephone booth across town and dialed Bologna’s leading newspaper. “This is the Armed Revolutionary Nuclei,” he said. “We claim responsibility for the explosion in the railway station.” The final toll: eighty-five dead—the eldest an eighty-six-year-old man, the youngest a three-year-old child—and more than two hundred wounded…

On the other hand, so is the fact that the Irish group INLA, “one of Ireland’s most ruthless terrorist groups”, was infiltrated by a German agent from the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) (Federal Office / Agency for the Protection of the Constitution) — who, incidentally, initially made contact with the group via his involvement in the Revolutionary Cells network. (Well, according to an article in The Times anyways: Iain Cobain and Allan Hall, ‘A spy in the INLA’, January 8, 200/1). Currently, the BfV is engaged in monitoring with a view to disrupting the “extreme left” networks planning A Big Party to celebrate the arrival of at least 8 war criminals in the German resort town of Heiligendamm in June. Word on the street is that the BfV is hoping to utilise an informant within the ranks of local Kiwi anarchists in order to penetrate the highest echelons of the organisers. (The INLA, it should be noted, declared a ceasefire on August 22, 1998.)

The challenge to state authorities presented by anarchist and leftist social movements in Europe is examined, briefly, by another article on Deutsche-Welle by Nick Aimes (‘Europe’s Radical Left Confronts Global Issues and Enemy Within’, April 9, 2007); the ‘radical left’, in this case, being the Marxist left, and the ‘enemy within’ anarchist and other libertarian revolutionaries. Rather humourously, Guy Taylor of the SWP front Globalise Resistance is quoted as stating that “For protests such as the EU and G8 summits, there is an umbrella organization that is established to coordinate such mobilizations… More often than not, it is Globalise Resistance that takes that role.”

    “Globalise Resistance exists mainly to increase the influence of the SWP within the anti-capitalist movement. It is only interested in activities to the extent that its brand recognition increases. For instance, commenting on Gothenburg GR’s full-time organiser and SWP member Guy Taylor said “GR has gone down brilliantly, the words on the GR banner People before Profit, Our World is Not for Sale were taken up and chanted by the whole protest!” Globalise Resistance would no more take part in an action without prominently displaying its banners and placards than an oil company would give money to an environmental project without telling anyone.”

In most respects, Aimes’ article simply replicates the standard tropes — established in the 1960s, and resurrected, periodically, as the need arises — of reporting on protest movements and events. Thus we are informed that: a) ‘the left’ is in some manner resurgent, however; b) a small element causes ‘trouble’; c) happily, authorities both within these movements and within the state agree on the need to control unruly elements — but; d) somewhat troublingly, they disagree over the best methods by which to do so. An ‘objective’ assessment of the situation is therefore required, and is provided by the academy, in this case Mudde and March.

Our first expert, Mudde, notes that: a) while ‘the left’ — which is considered to be synonymous with the Marxist left — has lacked institutional support since the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe and China, it remains ideologically purposive and; b) the far left and the far right have a common enemy in ‘globalisation’. Our second expert, March, on the other hand, quite boldly asserts that the violent elements what’s responsible for all the trouble may number no more than 200 (Europe has a population of 710,000,000), thereby constituting a vanguard of professional revolutionaries (and according to the familiar, Leninist model). Two ‘groups’ are singled out for attention in this regard: the Black Bloc and the ABC.

Recent examples, such as the riots in Copenhagen over the closing of a youth center which attracted radical left-wing extremists from around Europe, indicate that some activists are willing to travel to violently support causes in other countries. One far-left group which was involved in the Copenhagen demonstrations, the Anarchist Black Cross, organizes protests around the world…

Ah… er… um… yeah. Right. ‘Involvement’ is obviously a technical term meaning ‘subject to police repression’, while ‘protest organisation’ means ‘thorn in the side of the authorities’

Ah fuck it. Who cares anyway.

See also : Roger Boyes, ‘The feminist who fought sexism with fire bombs faces justice’, The Times, April 12, 2007; AP, ‘700 arrests for terror-related offenses in EU last year, Europol says’, International Herald Tribune, April 10, 2007; EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report TE-SAT 2007 [PDF]; Statewatch analysis: Europol — The final step in the creation of an “Investigative and Operational” European Police Force, by Professor Steve Peers, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, January, 2007 [PDF].

Posted in History, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

“I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat [little rich gay] man”

Bold talk: “I’m the person that’s led this charge”.
One-eyed fat (little rich gay) man: The name is Jones. Alan Jones: “It’s the tone that first strikes you. That slightly prissy, impatient, semi-sour way of speaking that makes his voice on radio so distinctive… That tone. Nagging. Insistent. Unrelenting.”

Actually, whenever I think of Jones — which is not often, thankfully — I think of two things: corruption and scandal. The corruption refers to his being on the payroll for various corporations, hawking their wares and praising their virtues, and failing to inform his elderly audience that he is being paid, quite handsomely, for his positive opinions. (Not that the old bigots cared, of course.) The scandal evokes memories of Chopper Read, Kerri-Anne Kennerly (Worst Female TV Personality, 2003) and probably the best moment in Australian television history, never to be acknowledged by the industry, but long to live in the discerning hearts and minds of the Australian public:

    March, 1998: Convicted murderer Chopper Read appears on The Midday Show on Channel 9 along with Alan Jones. Jones is there as a guest to voice his disgust at the ABC’s decision to give airtime to Read to defend his crimes. Read phones in and says, “People who throw stones better make sure they don’t live in glass houses… I never got arrested in [1988 in] a public toilet in London”. The charges [“outraging public decency” and “committing an indecent act”] in London were eventually dropped and costs awarded to Jones.

But of course. Actually, Read, not Jones, was scheduled to appear as Kerri-Anne’s very special guest that Friday, but a merciful appearance on Elle McFeast‘s (a/k/a Libbi Gore’s) execrable ABC show Elle McFeast Live put paid to that idea, Chopper’s drunken musings on feeding corpses into cement-mixers being considered a little too off-putting for the blue rinse brigade. Nevertheless, Midday Show producers conspired to have Chopper ‘spontaneously’ phone Kerri while his replacement Alan joined in the moral condemnation.

    I take the scum off the streets and give them a place to sleep
    Six-feet-deep under the concrete…
    It’s all a game, I’m a savage beast
    Especially when I’m drunk, ask Elle McFeast…
    Have ya whingeing to cops, claiming victims of crime compensation
    Then knock on ya door for my portion of the payment…
    I’m a dashing, silver-toothed, grinning lady pleezer
    As long as she doesn’t find the corpse stashed in the freezer

Sadly, while Chopper has recently been forced to file for bankruptcy, Jones continues to battle what to do with his hard-earned millions. He’s also recently been forced to tell the Australian Communications and Media Authority to go forth and reproduce after the deaf dumb and blind media watchdog decided in its wisdom that “2GB Sydney breached the code by broadcasting material on Breakfast with Alan Jones that was likely to encourage violence or brutality and to vilify people of Lebanese and Middle-Eastern backgrounds on the basis of ethnicity” back in December, 2005 — just prior to the Cronulla pogrom. A sample of Jones’ masterful DJing, from the (suppressed) NSW Police summary of the Hazzard report into the events at Cronulla, is provided by Fergus Michaels:

Talkback radio’s role in instigating the riots

Volume 4, Item 3 of the Hazzard report, entitled, “2GB Broadcast Synopsis: 4th December 2005 to 9th December 2005: Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Jason Morrison,” devotes 108 pages to broadcasts from Sydney radio station 2GB in the lead up to the Cronulla riots. Whilst not “strictly verbatim”, it is a “verified and accurate” record.

On these radio programs, listeners call in, correspondents read out letters, and the hosts constantly volunteer their opinions and interpretations of events and issues.

Alan Jones is one of Australia’s most promoted personalities, and enjoys the closest of relationships with Prime Minister John HoWARd, as well as with the Labor government in NSW. He is a former speechwriter for the Liberal Party, and a recipient of the Order of Australia.

It is impossible to reproduce the volume of filth and backwardness spewed forth by these radio commentators and their talk show guests in the space available for this article. But to give a sense of the racialist climate they created at the time, it is crucial to revisit at least some of what they said.

Day after day, hysterical exchanges such as the following occurred on morning radio:

Caller: “What kind of grubs do we have here?”

Jones: “What kind of grubs? This lot were Middle Eastern, we’re not allowed to say it, but I am saying it.”

The following “correspondence” was read on air by Jones:

* “Unfortunately this happens regularly at Cronulla—gangs of Lebanese youth just swarm over the beach, stealing from and assaulting beach goers; they pick on the youngest.”

* “Alan it’s not just a few Middle Eastern bastards at the weekend, it’s thousands. Cronulla is a very long beach and it’s been taken over by this scum; it’s not a few causing problems, it’s all of them.”

* “Police are too afraid to act … if we were allowed to act the way we want to, we could solve a lot of problems … these Middle Eastern people must be treated with a big stick—it’s the only thing they fear.”

Jones openly advocated and encouraged violent reprisals and vigilante behaviour against young men of Middle Eastern appearance.

For instance a caller, John, said: “These people, half of them may be home grown; they have infected minds; they don’t live the Australian way … if the police can’t do the job the next tier is to us.” Jones replied: “Yeah, good on ya, John.” When John said: “Shoot one, the rest will run … when you’re outnumbered 20 to 1 you don’t put your hand up and play by Queensbury rules,” Jones replied with laughter and added: “You don’t play by Queensbury rules; good on ya, John.”

As a result, ACMA will be writing a strongly-worded letter to Jones’ employer, Harbour Radio Pty Ltd (licensee of 2GB), in the hopes of entering a dialogue regarding what may or may not be an appropriate action to take in light of Jones’ breach (Dylan Welch / AAP, ‘Jones rapped for pre-riot ‘scum’ remarks’, Sydney Morning Herald, April 10, 2007). More specifically, “Mr Jones was found to have breached the code by reading comments from a listener suggesting, in the week before the riots, that bikie gangs should head down to Cronulla to sort out Lebanese gangs” (Andrew Clennell, ‘Jones breaches code with riot talk’, Sydney Morning Herald, April 11, 2007).

Oddly enough, this sort of thing is what neo-Nazi salesman Peter Campbell suggested would be an appropriate course of action to take in response to the appearance of ‘men of Middle Eastern appearance’ at Cronulla. (Campbell was investigated by police in September 2006 for allegedly distributing a bomb-making manual, modelled on that produced by Douglas Copeland, the infamous Soho bomber.)

Generally speaking, bikies are loathe to involve themselves in ‘politics’, but there are exceptions. Later this month, for example, the Wellington chapter of Satan’s Slaves will be hosting Newcastle-based neo-Nazi Viking rock ‘n’ roll band Blood Red Eagle in a joint celebration of Adolf Hitler‘s birthday; while in Brisbane, members of Stormfront Down Under briefly used the Bandidos‘ clubhouse to meet after chancing upon some Muslims at their previous venue, a public park, and fleeing in panic.

One person who hasn’t fled in the face of the menace from the Middle East is Australian Prime Minister John HoWARd, who has fulsomely praised Jones’ role as a ‘controversial’ (read: bigoted) Sydney shock-jock and loyal Tory propagandist (AAP, ‘PM backs Jones in riot row’, Sydney Morning Herald, April 11, 2007):

…Mr HoWARd today called Jones an “outstanding broadcaster”.

“I am not going to get involved in comments on individual decisions, but let me say this; I think Alan Jones is an outstanding broadcaster,” Mr HoWARd said.

“I don’t think he’s a person who encourages prejudice in the Australian community, not for one moment, but he is a person who articulates what a lot of people think,” he said.

In his morning radio show, Jones today attacked the authority’s ruling.

“Anyone who knows me knows I’ve never encouraged violence or brutality in anything … and I did the exact opposite but our defences counted for nothing,” Jones told his listeners.

One excerpt Jones read from a listener on December 7 recommended that bikie gangs confront “Lebanese thugs” at the Cronulla railway station.

Jones today played another excerpt from about the same time telling a listener not to promote the riot, which eventually ensued on December 11…

Said ‘uprising’ being commemorated — in a rather pathetic manner, it must be said — one year later by the Australia First Party — led by, of all things, a man of Lebanese descent.

Posted in Anti-fascism, Media, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Wolf, blogs, journalism, blah blah blah I’m giving up smoking fuck you get pissed destroy

Above : Seemingly gratuitous img of a journalist. Sitting on Naomi Robson‘s shoulder. Oddly enough, despite the many and eminently sensible calls for Robson’s imprisonment for crimes against good taste, Australian corporate media has spent more time reading the entrails produced by her bloody departure last year from Today Tonight than it has paying attention to Josh Wolf‘s many months in prison for having attempted to engage in some ‘real’ journalism.

San Francisco Chronicle | Open Forum
On a journalist’s duty to the public / PRO: Federal shield law is needed to extend journalist protections
Josh Wolf
April 9, 2007

It feels as if I’ve barely had a chance to blink since walking out the front gate of the Federal Detention Center in Dublin on April 3, but the debates on what we should take away from my experience have already escalated into a full-on storm of differing voices. Much of the debate has focused on whether or not I am a journalist; this question is nothing more than a distraction and a red herring over the very real issues exposed by the marathon saga that only concluded when I was released from custody.

For the purposes of this argument, let’s assume that I am a journalist. What does this story mean for the role of media in our society?

In February 2006, I was subpoenaed by the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force to appear before a federal grand jury with my source materials and submit to secret examination, a demand that would be unenforceable in a state court under the California shield law’s protection for journalists. The federal government claimed jurisdiction because it was investigating the alleged attempted arson of a San Francisco Police Department vehicle. The federal officials rationalized this claim with a tenuous connection, that is, that federal money was provided to the SFPD.

As would any journalist when his legal rights are circumvented, I decided to fight the subpoena and eventually found myself in federal prison on Aug. 1. During the course of our legal battle, my lawyers and I offered to screen the footage for U.S. District Judge William Alsup in order to show there was nothing of evidentiary value in the unpublished video, but he repeatedly refused to judge the merits of the tape. Though there was nothing of a sensitive nature on my unpublished tape, I continued to fight for the rights I feel were robbed from everyone through my available appeals.

The appeals proved unsuccessful and it was at this time that we decided to put forward the very same resolution we agreed upon last week: I would provide the tape for all to see in exchange for being excused from testifying before the grand jury. We were rejected.

After the judge ordered both parties into a mediation hearing with U.S. Magistrate Joseph Spero, we were eventually able to agree on the original November proposal. On April 3, my video was posted on the Internet, and then provided to the U.S. attorney, along with a declaration stating “no” to two questions:

Could I identify the person Officer Peter Shields was chasing?

Did I witness the incident of the alleged attempted arson?

Many have suggested I am not a journalist because I have personal views about my subject matter; others have argued that I don’t qualify for journalistic protections because I am not employed as a journalist by a corporation. How would a “journalist with a press pass” have responded to such a demand by the federal government?

While I was fighting my legal battle, two reporters for The Chronicle were in a similar situation. The circumstances may have been different, but I think the principle was the same. Thankfully, Chronicle staff writers Mark Fainaru-Wadu and Lance Williams were able to escape doing jail time, but in both cases, we resisted government demands that go against California law and a journalist’s ethics.

The question that needs to be asked is not “Is Josh Wolf a journalist?” but should journalists deserve the same protections in federal court as those afforded them in state courts.

The answer is yes and the means to do it is for Congress to pass a federal shield law equivalent to California’s law. Fainaru-Wadu and Williams could have just as easily been in my place at FDC Dublin. There are no protections afforded to journalists in the context of a federal grand jury. The debate over who qualifies as a journalist can wait, but we need a federal shield law now.

    See also : Dan Silkstone, ‘The blogs that ate cyberspace’, The Age, April 7, 2007. “Blogs give you voice and validation. Say anything you like and if you are lucky, somebody will hear you and leave a reply. Once upon a time people wrote their most private thoughts in a diary and hid it in their top drawer. Now they post them for all the world to see. Then, the writer’s warning was publish and be damned. Now, the great fear is publish and be ignored.” Geert Lovink, ‘Blogging, the nihilist impulse’, Eurozine, February 1, 2007. [Original in English. First published in Lettre Internationale 73 (German version).] “Media theorist and Internet activist Geert Lovink formulates a theory of weblogs that goes beyond the usual rhetoric of citizens’ journalism. Blogs lead to decay, he writes. What’s declining is the “Belief in the Message”. Instead of presenting blog entries as mere self-promotion, we should interpret them as decadent artefacts that remotely dismantle the broadcast model.”

100,000 protesters prepare to disrupt G8 summit
Roger-Boyes-in-Berlin
The Times
April 10, 2007

More than 100,000 demonstrators are planning to disrupt the G8 summit this June in the German seaside resort of Heiligendamm — and the dress rehearsals [sic] have already begun.

German [and Kiwi] anarchists travelled to Copenhagen last month to give a violent edge to street protests against the closing of a youth centre. The visitors helped the Danes to erect blazing barricades and filled an armoury of petrol bombs [?]. Then came a stand-off with riot police in Berlin — and more arson as the car of Thomas Mirow, the German deputy Finance Minister, was set alight.

    According to Der Spiegel, in an advanced case of what media spindoktors are calling ‘Anti-Globalization Rage’ Disease, in late December 2006 Mirow’s wife’s car was set alight “…and paint balls were thrown against the wall of [his] house. Mirow described the attack as “an act of banal violence of rare senselessness”, saying that it was not the way to gain support for a fair world order. The arson attack was the 37th protest in Germany to date by militant G8 opponents, according to a police spokesperson from the special “Kavala” police unit which has been created for the G8 summit” (‘Protesters Carry Out Series of Attacks Ahead of G8 Summit’, December 29, 2006). Note that Greek anarchists have been setting fire to enough things to be granted some (more) media too — ‘Diplomatic car destroyed in Greek arson attack’, International Herald Tribune, [AP], April 6, 2007.

    In general, while rage-filled German arsonists — generally referred to, in Anti-Globalization circles, as Die Deconstructionists — have been known to work closely with German engineers, the history of the relationship between arts graduates (and literature studies graduates in particular) and engineering students is punctuated by sometimes violent sectarianism. Sources close to European squatters’ networks, however, believe that the intervention of a small group of perhaps no more than 40 Kiwi football hooligans has prevented such disputes from emerging in the hothouse political environment of Copenhagen, and it was this key development that allowed the otherwise notoriously slow-moving Danes to place objects on top of one another in order to form what is often termed a ‘barricade’. As for the armoury of petrol bombs, it is unclear at this stage precisely what accounts for the Danes’ astonishing ability to pour liquid into bottles, but a police source states that the intervention of Kiwi anarchists was again crucial.

Opposition to the G8 meeting on the Baltic Sea runs like a thread through all the incidents. The last big showdown before the summit is expected to be May Day in the German capital. Police are already calling it “a warming-up exercise”.

For years May Day in Berlin has been a moment of controlled anger when teenagers go on the rampage, looting shops and setting fire to police cars. This time it seems likely to have a political veneer [sic]. Leaflets show a picture of President Bush’s Air Force One next to a mangled wreck. The “autonomist groups”, anarchist cells across Germany, have called for a month of violence. “Destroy the image of your town,” says one pamphlet Riot against G8. A music CD, meanwhile, entitled Move against G8, will be released after May Day.

“We have never before seen such a militant campaign of the extreme Left in northern Germany,” says Claudia Schmid, head of the Berlin wing of the Agency for the Protection of the Constitution, the equivalent of the Special Branch. Similar reports are coming from Denmark, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic.

About 16,000 police, the most concentrated deployment since the war, have been drafted from across the country and will be backed by soldiers. A 13km (8 mile) steel wall topped with barbed wire is being built around the spa that once played host to the Russian Tsar, Felix Mendelssohn and Adolf Hitler.

Two US naval vessels will be moored off the coast, partly to intercept possible missiles, partly to monitor the water-front. A Royal Navy vessel is to help to patrol the 11km maritime security zone. The 6,000 [embedded] journalists will be taken in and out of the red zone on a steam train, with armed guards.

“It will be a uniquely large and difficult operation, larger than the World Cup,” said Wolfgang Pistol, chief of police in Schleswig-Holstein. The two-day summit, entitled Growth with Responsibility, is costing close to €100 million (£68 million) for security alone.

Posted in Anarchism, Media, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Bübi

Above : Bübi casts a critical eye over the contents of Anarchy #56; later that afternoon he and I contemplated Michael William’s thoughts on ‘Cats and Domestication’.

Posted in Anarchism, Cats | 10 Comments