September 11 / S11 / 9:11

1973 :

‘Chile’s Pinochet victims testify’
Clinton Porteous
BBC News, Santiago
May 13, 2004

Human rights groups say Pinochet’s regime killed thousands

More than 30,000 Chileans have said they were victims of torture or political detention under the 17-year Pinochet regime that ended in 1990.

The public was invited to testify to a government commission that is examining human rights abuses.

There were many reports from men and women of sexual abuse, with about 10% of the testimonies coming from women.

Most said they were victims in 1973 – soon after the military coup that brought [hijo de puta] General Augusto Pinochet to power.

Sexual torture

Testimonies were collected from 30,000 or so people from all over Chile, many of them speaking for the first time about their experiences.

Commission lawyer Cristian Correa said a substantial number of victims spoke of sexual abuse.

“Men and women victims of sexual torture – we have received a lot of testaments of that kind of things.

“These kind of perversions are fairly common if you feel there is no limit on what you can do.”

One torture centre in Santiago was known as “Venda Sexy” – or Sexy Blindfold – and was notorious.

More were victims

The commission is the first in Chile to examine torture and detention under Augusto Pinochet’s military government.

Other enquiries have examined the number of dead and concluded more than 3,000 political opponents were killed.

Human rights groups have criticised the commission for only hearing testimonies for six months.

They believe more than 100,000 people were tortured or detained during the military government…

2000 :

MEDIA RELEASE from Legal Response Team…

Media Release
Legal Support Team

Brutal police attack on WEF protest

7.40PM: Tuesday, Crown Casino
Melbourne, Australia

Lawyers and members of the legal support team were shocked and outraged by brutal police assaults on protesters at the World Economic Forum, last night.

Witness statements and observations by the legal support team documented the following account of the police brutality, including the use of potentially lethal force.

Without warning or any attempt at negotiation police attacked a peaceful blockade outside Crown Casino this evening.

The ferocity and violence of the attack was the worst seen so far in WEF protests marred by police violence.

Police charged through and over the protesters wielding long PR-24 side handled batons, striking protesters over the head and body.

Protesters were kicked, punched and dragged behind police lines.

Protesters trapped between lines of police horses and the Casino fence were beaten and prodded through the fence with batons.

One man was beaten by police, while lying prone, and possibly unconsciousness, behind police lines. He was subsequently taken to hospital by ambulance with suspected spinal injuries.

Over 30 people were taken by ambulance or had to attend hospital for treatment. Several protesters have serious injuries, predominately to the head and neck. Some remain hospitalised.

Several hundred police and at least 40 police horses were used to cordon off the intersection of Power St and Queensbridge Rd, to allow several buses carrying WEF delegates to leave the Casino.

Some people were arrested, but shortly after released.

Earlier in the day the legal support team had called on the Victorian Ombudsman to investigate police actions at the protest.

Damien Lawson said today, “The Victorian Ombudsman must intervene as a matter of urgency to prevent further unlawful action by the police and serious injuries to members of the public exercising their right to protest. If protesters have breached the law they can be dealt with by the courts, rather police have acted as judge and jury circumventing the justice system by meting out their own arbritary brutal and dangerous punishment.”

Pauline Spencer said today, “Which ever member of police command who authorised this premeditated use of potentially lethal force should resign. These actions were unjustifiable and parallel human rights abuses seen in some of the worst repressive regimes in the world.

Dedicated to the cowardly police officer who fractured my girlfriend’s cheekbone… you only strengthened our resolve.

2001 :

Q: “The world will never be the same after 11.09.01”. Do you think so?

Chomsky: The horrendous terrorist attacks on Tuesday are something quite new in world affairs, not in their scale and character, but in the target. For the US, this is the first time since the War of 1812 that its national territory has been under attack, even threat. Its colonies have been attacked, but not the national territory itself. During these years the US virtually exterminated the indigenous population, conquered half of Mexico, intervened violently in the surrounding region, conquered Hawaii and the Philippines (killing hundreds of thousands of Filipinos), and in the past half century particularly, extended its resort to force throughout much of the world. The number of victims is colossal. For the first time, the guns have been directed the other way. The same is true, even more dramatically, of Europe. Europe has suffered murderous destruction, but from internal wars, meanwhile conquering much of the world with extreme brutality. It has not been under attack by its victims outside, with rare exceptions (the IRA in England, for example). It is therefore natural that NATO should rally to the support of the US; hundreds of years of imperial violence have an enormous impact on the intellectual and moral culture.

It is correct to say that this is a novel event in world history, not because of the scale of the atrocity — regrettably — but because of the target. How the West chooses to react is a matter of supreme importance. If the rich and powerful choose to keep to their traditions of hundreds of years and resort to extreme violence, they will contribute to the escalation of a cycle of violence, in a familiar dynamic, with long-term consequences that could be awesome. Of course, that is by no means inevitable. An aroused public within the more free and democratic societies can direct policies towards a much more humane and honorable course.

Posted in Anti-fascism, Film, History, State / Politics, War on Terror | 2 Comments

Darrin Hodges… Again. And for the last time.

One of the few good things about the neo-Nazi porn salesman Darrin Hodges — apart from his handsome face: yeah, that’s him up there — is his conviction that he’s quite a clever fellow. The fact that he’s actually quite a daft bugger makes his pathetic attempts at critique all the more amusing. Thus, Hodges writes:

Friday, September 08, 2006

Andrew Morgan of Melbourne, aka ‘@ndy'[,] is a liar.

Yes, I’m sure you would all be surprised at the fact that [a] fightdemback.com forum member could be a liar, but I’m afraid it’s true. You see, in his blog… Andrew does in fact tell a porky:

Seriously though: I can only assume that your reference to my “brother” is a result of something Ben Weerheym claimed on his now deleted blog ‘Leftywatch’. To cut a long story short: any and all information regarding my “brother” was provided to Ben by aketus, posing as ‘cricket guy 88′ (or something similar). The story aketus relayed to Ben revolved around my having a non-existent brother, who was described as being both an ex-bikie, an ex-con, and as having a great deal of love for his family. Anyway, the ‘evidence’ for this “brother” was to be based on the non-existent minutes taken at a non-existent meeting of a non-existent group, the ‘Geelong Anarchist Group’… or ‘GAG’ for short.

Well, it’s not quite true[.] [S]ee, way back in January 2005, Andrew posted this on his older blog:

Looking after my brother Jamie’s house this last week-and-a-half, I (re-)discovered an Australian rock classic: Dave Warner’s From the Suburbs! To be precise, Mug’s Game, from which the following, achingly [ha!] accurate lines are drawn…

But wait, [there’s] more, the trusty blog search also reveals an extra nugget of information:

Looking after my brother Jamie’s house in Mitcham this last week-and-a-half, I (re-)discovered an Australian rock classic: Dave’s Warner’s From the Suburbs! To be precise, Mug’s Game… [snip]

[So] he looked after the non-existent house of his non-existent brother?

[H]mmm, pants on fire.

Honestly, Darrin, you’re a very silly man. I mean, gee whiz, has it ever occurred to you that I have a family? Brothers? Sisters even? Shit, the way you blokes carry on about decreasing fertility rates among whites, you’d reckon mum ‘n’ dad deserved a medal, not harassment!

So, for the benefit of stupid buggers like Darrin: the fairy tale revolves not around the fact that — eeek! who woulda thunk it! — I have family, but that I have a brother as described. Of course, the supposed fact that I have a brother named Jamie who lives in Mitcham is not especially relevant… is it? Well, unless Darrin believes that this may constitute a possible means through which to embarrass or intimidate me.

Which is a very dangerous assumption: at best.

Still, when all’s said and done, it’s like what Jewish singer-songwriter Lou Reed‘s painter friend Donald said:

Stick a fork in their ass and turn them over, they’re done.

Posted in Anti-fascism | 12 Comments

Blood & Honour in Belgium… and Australia

While local (neo-Nazi) boneheads are preparing to gather in Melbourne on September 23rd to celebrate Ian Stuart‘s death — an event organised by Blood and Honour Australia, including such notables as Australia First‘s Welf Herfurth* and Cronulla videographer James Newman — in Belgium the International Herald Tribune (September 8, 2006) reports that:

The Belgian police said they seized more than 100 weapons and detained two new suspects Friday in an investigation into a neo-Nazi network that they assert involves soldiers and might have been capable of mounting terror attacks…

They also said they had seized illegal weapons during the raids, a homemade bomb, land mine detonators, large quantities of ammunition and neo-Nazi propaganda…

The raids brought to public attention an undercover two-year investigation of a soldier who prosecutors said had brought together a group of far-right sympathizers to spread neo-Nazi ideology.

(A process which — according to a report issued earlier this year by the Southern Poverty Law Centre — has been repeated within the US armed forces and — according to members of Scumfront Down Under — is also a strategy being pursued by local, Australian neo-Nazis.)

In addition, The Jerusalem Post (September 8, 2006) reports that:

Police said the suspects may have been members of the Flanders branch of the international neo-Nazi network Blood and Honour, and said the raids foiled a violent plot that was in the making. The ringleader, a soldier, is thought to have been planning to move the plot into action.

A story which is reinforced by another provided by Blokwatch.

Earlier, in May, one courageous Belgian bonehead shot to death two people: a two year-old (white) child and her (pregnant, black) nanny.

Perth-based racist David Innes, meanwhile, while having his website kicked from neo-Nazi pillar to neo-Nazi post, is happily having his racist outporings hosted by LoudCity: proving that some businesses (like DreamHost) will do absolutely anything for money.

* Welf Herfurth (currently a prominent member of James Saleam’s Australia First party) is one of Blood & Honour‘s main organisers in Australia, and has a long history, both here and in his previous home, Germany, of neo-Nazi militancy. When not discussing his exciting travels in Asia, Herfurth can be found working in close collaboration with Saleam, acting as MC at the fascist Sydney Forum (this year hosted by Sydney’s Estonian community — of which more later). Unfortunately for Herfurth, he was unable to extend a personal welcome to Gerd Finkenwirth of the German neo-Nazi National Democratic Party in 2005 as the Australian Government denied Finkenwirth a visa.

Posted in Anti-fascism | 8 Comments

Cheryl Sings the Heinemann Electric Blues

[Update : As far as bad bosses go you don’t get much worse than Heinemann Electrics. Heinemann have forced their workers on to the picket line by refusing to negotiate a decent agreement or to pay them for a whole week’s work. Show our brothers and sisters at Heinemann that they aren’t standing alone. Come to a solidarity breakfast on the picket line at 821 Springvale Rd, Mulgrave at 8.00am on Wednesday, 13th September 2006. You can also donate to the fighting fund for this dispute. Donations are being collected at the picket, or can be left with Linda or Jacqui at the ETU office at 516-520 Swanston St Carlton South. Receipts for donations can also be issued via the ETU office… BYO vegeburgers and sausages!]

Singing the Heinemann Electric Blues
by Cheryl Cemeljic
Saturday September 09, 2006
clc73[at]optusnet[dot]com[dot]au

    Australians all let us rejoice; for we shall work for free?

    Presently I am spending my days standing outside Heinemann Electric Pty Ltd, the company that my mother has worked in for 18 years, my father and husband for 3 years, and though I left early this year, I was employed there for 13 years, working with my mother and husband in the Slegers Products division. Why am I standing on the outside of these gates? After months of workers and management negotiating an EBA, things came to a standstill when John HoWARd’s IR laws came into effect, and the company backflipped on many of their negotiated clauses, expecting no resistance. An imminent signing by all parties was looking promising, until the point where the company decided instead to offer a very different EBA than the one negotiated.

    To try to be heard in a hopeless situation and bring management back to the negotiating table, it was decided to apply a minimal amount of industrial pressure by putting a ban on overtime, and to choose one day only of strike action. Currently the company operates under a policy of voluntary overtime, though they are now claiming that the overtime hours are part of their normal continuous hours (bull!). While not expecting to be paid for the day of strike action, the company threatened that all employees refusing to do “voluntary?” overtime would not be paid for their normal hours of work either. It was advised on Tuesday, 22 August 2006, that employees would not be paid while an overtime ban was effective, and it wasn’t until Thursday, 24 August 2006, that this was proven with pay receipts. A minimum of 3 working days must be given of intended industrial action, so for 5 days normal hours were worked, and for more than 40 employees those 5 days have still not been paid.

    More than half the people effected have never been asked to work overtime by the company prior to the individual interviews held by Richard Ross on 22 August, 2006.

    This has been allowed to occur because the new interpretation of the law is that a company is not obliged to pay employees during industrial action, always interpreted previously as industrial “strike” action. This creative interpretation was advised to the company by Freehills, the lawyers who helped draft the WorkChoice laws, who initially claimed the clause was “overlooked” and the company found it themselves, but finally had to admit they lead the company to it. While the Industrial Relations Commission agreed the company should pay the employees, it seemed to have no power to force this action.

    Heinemann Electric is a national company, with its base of operations in Mulgrave, Victoria, and sales branches in each state.

    As a further slap in the face to the Australian people, the parent company in South Africa, CBI, which is part of the very successful Reunert group which also owns Mitsubishi Electric and GE Electric, refuses to guarantee the accrued entitlements of local workers. The only people who will give these workers anything if this poorly managed company goes belly-up is the Australian taxpayer through the Gears Scheme. We are supposed to be a first world country, but John HoWARd’s new WorkChoice laws are making it possible for third world ideas to become our practice.

    So if you pass me on Springvale Road in Mulgrave, and you’ll recognise me as the waving lunatic, please have a heart. I could be you one day. The only choices left are to give up all negotiating rights and accept a one-sided EBA; remain inside the factory working, not being paid; or take it to the streets and fight. Which will you choose?

    I would like to personally thank some very valued supporters who are helping boost morale in some very tough times. This list is growing daily, so please forgive me if you are not mentioned here.

    To those who wave and toot their horns in support, your voice is greatly appreciated. To the many people who have stopped to ask us why we are there, and have offered their words of encouragement and support, especially the beautiful lady who bought us coffee, thank you.

    Thank you to the builder’s union for our very handy shelter which was very timely, and to the many unions who are standing by us and providing much support and encouragement. To the fantastic guys at Amcor who have been so generous with their support, thank you.

    A very special thanks to the ETU organisers and members, who are standing by us daily, and supporting us when the fight seems too hard. We are proud to stand arm in arm and fight. Our forefathers’ blood, sweat, and tears gained us the rights we have today. Loading, annual leave, better wage conditions, protection of accrued entitlements, an eight hour day, these all had to be fought for. Today these rights stand precariously on a cliff made by little John. We can only hope that our fight will help you when it is your turn to fight, and believe me, we will all have a turn.

    HEINEMANN ELECTRIC PTY LTD – ALL WORK AND NO PAY? NO WAY!!!

Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics | 3 Comments

Heinemann & Freehills : Industrial Relations, South African style

Praise boss when morning work-bells chime.
Praise him for bits of overtime.
Praise him whose wars we love to fight.
Praise him, fat leech and parasite.

‘All work and no pay may be immoral but it’s legal, company says’
Dan Silkstone
The Age
September 8, 2006

THEY worked all week and will be paid nothing. Their union says it is unprecedented, the workers say it is immoral. But under Australia’s workplace laws it appears to be legal.

Mulgrave company Heinemann Electrics is refusing to pay 54 workers for five days of work last month because they placed a ban on working overtime during that period as part of an industrial campaign for a new enterprise bargaining agreement.

Despite working 38 hours between August 22 and August 28, all of the workers have been told they will not be paid because of a decade-old provision in Australian workplace law that, the company says, prohibits employers from paying workers during industrial action.

Before taking the action, Heinemann received legal advice from Freehills — a key architect of the HoWARd Government’s new industrial relations legislation. Heinemann said yesterday it had no choice but to refuse to pay or it would be in breach of the Workplace Relations Act.

But ACTU President Sharan Burrow said the action was a “monstrous interpretation” of the law. “These men have worked for five days for no pay,” she said. “Does the Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews think that this is fair?”

[Is that a rhetorical question Sharan?]

A similar question was put to Prime Minister John HoWARd in question time yesterday by the Opposition [sic]. “If you work for 40 hours and there are no countervailing circumstances, of course you should get paid,” he said.

Partial work bans have long been used as a moderate tactic in disputes. But Electrical Trades Union secretary Dean Mighell said the company’s action would have a big effect on union tactics.

He said the new interpretation would leave workers no alternative but to stop work entirely, a move the Mulgrave workers took yesterday. “Total warfare or nothing,” he said. “That’s where Australian industrial relations is now at, tragically.”

The workers’ overtime ban had been approved by the Industrial Relations Commission and was considered a legal action under the WorkChoices legislation. Overtime was not compulsory at the factory.

Heinemann general manager Richard Ross said the company had acted appropriately: “We had to look at it and apply the law in the correct way,” he said. “That’s what we did, it’s nothing more than that.” Asked if it was immoral to accept workers’ labour and refuse to pay for it, he said: “Is there a moral requirement for me to break the law?”

Mr Andrews said the matter would be investigated by the Office of Workplace Services to see if the company had acted properly. The dispute relates to a new enterprise bargaining agreement, under which the company wants an arrangement where staff work an average 38-hour week over a month. Workers could be required to work 20 hours one week and 60 the next.

South African company Circuit Breaker Industries took over Heinemann two years ago and has since received repeated warnings from WorkSafe for bullying workers.

Nalin Nawagamuwage has assembled circuit boards at the factory for 13 years and said the new owners had been a nightmare. “They are really arrogant and grumpy … The water cooler is broken so we ask for it to be replaced, they just took it away … Everyone working here has been very stressed.”

Heinemann Electrics sounds like the kinda place that would welcome neo-fucking-Nazis in its ranks!

You pick on the weak
You’re only strong in groups
Can’t do shit on your own
You pick on those who are few
Right winged scum
You have no place in our scene
Right winged scum
We’ll teach you what SOLIDARITY really means

Contact : Heinemann Electrics | Freehills

[See also : Union Solidarity | Zabalaza!]

Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics | 1 Comment

Battle in Seattle // This Revolution

First Rosario Dawson play-acted an ‘anarchist’ (I think) called ‘Tina Santiago’ in This Revolution; now Charlize Theron is slated to play-act — What? A ‘concerned citizen’ or something? Sounds like it — “Lou, a pregnant bystander who loses her child in the melee of protests and regards events with some objectivity” in Battle in Seattle.

What’s next?

Monica Bellucci in Death in Genoa?

(Actually, Belluci will portray Sonia Gandhi in the 2007 biopic Sonia.)

See also : some (other) bloke called Andrew’s reflections on (the excellent) Film and the Anarchist Imagination by Richard Porton; Lizzie Borden’s (criminally neglected) Born in Flames; & V for Vendetta.

Posted in !nataS, Anarchism, Film, History, Media, Music, Sex & Sexuality, State / Politics | Leave a comment

Scumfront Brisbane : Comedy Central

Ahhh, Queensland.

Beautiful one month, perfect the next.

While Zionist students worry about the supposedly anti-Semitic antics of Socialist Alternative, Brisbane-based members of Scumfront Down Under have been running into all sorts of trouble simply trying to hold a BBQ.

Last month, the racist wankers managed to arrange for themselves to be denied entry to the Medieval Fayre; this month, their picnicking was interrupted by the presence of — eeek! — Muslims!

Well, that’s what the boneheads on Shitfront reckon.

According to the pseudonymous organiser 3sevens, while up to 20 neo-Nazis gathered in order to eat chops and sausages (and, presumably, to blame ZOG for their poor quality — they’ve only themselves to blame for the poor quality of the conversation!), at some point the scum “were confronted by a large group of muds”, leaving these brave souls “no choice but to pack up [their] gear and leave”.

On the highly amusing Scumfront thread in question, not being content with the description given by 3sevens, Aquila Audax asks “What breed of mud were they?”. “Muslims”, replies Anthonytwunt: a supposition which seems to have struck real fear into the hearts of the racists; this despite the fact that the two groups were apparently of equal number, and despite the fact that the ‘muds’ apparently simply expressed a desire to talk with the assembled racists and fascists (although Godwin knows why they’d bother).

As for their decision to flee, presumably the assembled neo-Nazis were afraid of the consequences of engaging in a full and frank discussion with their fellow citizens: who knows?

In any case, 3sevens justifies the group’s decision to flee on the basis that “we had a female with us” and because he was fearful of other ‘muds’ joining the ‘muds’ already assembled, leaving the scum outnumbered as well as outgunned.

Obviously a thinker, Anthonytwunt reminds readers that this was ‘real life’, not a film, and that when confronted by opposing forces, a victory is far from assured. Further, in the absence of some kind of ‘voodoo’, less than likely in his opinion.

barbarossa2010, however, opines that running away was the wrong thing to do, and has the effect of leaving the casual observer with the impression that Shitfront members are not only racist, but cowardly to boot.

It’s at this point that Perth-based Scumfront moderator Lilith Peterson intervenes, declaring that, while she doesn’t know what happened, the boys (and one girl) should be congratulated — although whether for simply assembling, fleeing, or assembling and then fleeing is somewhat unclear.

Whatever: the event was clearly a triumph for the White Race.

Clearly a fan, Luke Connors (young_soldier) agrees: “Very smart words from the clever cat lady” he claims, recalling the years he spent being beaten up in the boxing ring (before deciding that he’d lead a healthier lifestyle outside of it). BluedEyedBlonde also agrees with Lilith, declaring that running away was “exactly the right thing” to do, and clear evidence of the existence of both “intelligence and courage” among the assembled racists.

Obviously incensed at the accusation of cowardice, Hammerskin38 sets the record straight: during the course of the BBQ, the assembled racists spied some people they believed were Muslims and abused them, whereupon the abused Muslims left. Later, they returned.

One, whom the bonehead in question took to be a leader, asked for an explanation for the abuse, which the bonehead refused, preferring the use of violence to reason.

For reasons which are obvious.

The point being: “THE ARABS WERE GUTLESS SCUM”, and — far from being cowards — the fascists who briefly stood their ground before deciding to leave were fearful of being attacked. (To do otherwise, apparently, would have meant that the assembled fascists ended up dead, in hospital, or in prison.)

Another bonehead, bootboys_brisbane, agrees with Hammerskin38. Interestingly, he adds that he intends journeying to Melbourne, presumably for the Ian Stuart is Dead celebration on September 23rd.

Why on Earth the boneheads in question think that the reception in Melbourne will be any warmer is beyond me.

Posted in Anti-fascism | 6 Comments

Anti-Semitism on campus?

Two articles have appeared in The Age recently alleging an increase in anti-Semitic incidents on campus, and accusing the ‘far left’ — Socialist Alternative in particular — of engaging in intimidating tactics. The first recapitulates a press release from the Australasian Union of Jewish Students:

‘Jews in fear of hardline uni groups’
Barney Zwartz and Adam Morton
The Age
September 4, 2006

RADICAL left-wing groups at Melbourne universities are exploiting tensions in the Middle East to promote anti-Semitism and recruit members, according to Jewish student groups.

“There’s a real feeling of threat,” said Deon Kamien, Victorian president of the [Zionist] Australasian Union of Jewish Students.

He said Jewish students for the first time felt targeted as Jews, rather than supporters of Israel. “When they walk past socialist stalls (on campus) they feel very uncomfortable, especially when called ‘a f—ing Jew’,” Mr Kamien said.

He said Students Against War and Racism gave out leaflets at Monash University recently that said Zionists were murderers and racists and “will not be tolerated on this campus”.

The number of anti-Semitic incidents during the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in July were the highest since records began in 1945, according to Grahame Leonard, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

“At 141, it was 60 per cent higher than the previous record. Many of these incidents were on campus, and the big growth was in Victoria,” Mr Leonard said.

“It’s just blind ideology with these (hard-line left) groups … It’s not about Muslims, it’s about thugs and radicals using Islam as an excuse to pursue their political agenda.”

There have been several incidents on Melbourne campuses, particularly between [SocAlt] and university Liberal Party groups.

In one, a Liberal was grabbed by the throat and threatened. In another, security staff had to separate Students Against War and Racism and Liberal Club members waving Israeli flags.

In Sydney, Jewish students have been spat on and pushed.

Official religious groups on campus say Middle Eastern tensions have not been apparent in Australia. The national heads of Muslim, Jewish, Catholic and Baha’i student groups released a joint statement when conflict broke out in Lebanon.

Monash University Islamic Society president Adhnan Wazil said Jewish students had been quiet and there had been no problems for Muslims.

Mr Kamien said Jewish students had had no problems with Muslim students in general.

Students Against War and Racism organiser Vashti Kenway, a member of [SocAlt], acknowledged Middle Eastern tensions were being used as a recruitment tool, but denied they were anti-Semitic. “We take a firm stand against all forms of racism,” she said.

Melbourne University Student Union president Jessie Giles said anti-war activists walked a fine line between attacking Israel’s actions as a state, which was legitimate, and making students feel awkward over religion, which was not.

Interestingly, these allegations were preceded by similiar allegations of political intimidation of leftists by Zionist students. And on the same day as The Age article, the following appeared in the Herald Sun:

‘Junior Libs accused of Jewish slur’
Ellen Whinnett
Herald-Sun
September 4, 2006

THE Liberal Party is fuming over an embarrassing scandal which has erupted at one of its junior off-shoots, the Melbourne University Liberal Club.

A secretly recorded tape of a meeting is alleged to have caught some university Liberal Club officials swearing, making anti-Semitic remarks and commenting on inciting tensions between Lebanon and Israel.

A club official has been forced to resign after being accused of leaking details about the scandal, but instead of going quietly, the woman fired off an angry email accusing the club of intimidating her.

An infuriated Liberal Party hierarchy has launched an investigation and disciplinary action could be taken against some members of the MULC who are also members of the Liberal Party.

While the two organisations are separate, there are a number of connections, including:

THE club secretary accused of making anti-Semitic remarks, Brendan Rowswell, works for Federal Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella.

THE woman alleged to have secretly recorded the meeting, former club vice-president Jayde Lovell, works at Liberal Party headquarters, Melbourne.

OTHER club members — who are not the subject of any allegations — work for Federal MP Tony Smith and Senator Mitch Fifield, both key allies of Federal Treasurer Peter Costello.

Ms Lovell claims she was forced to resign.

The scandal threatens to damage Liberal Party relations with important allies in the Jewish community and is a serious distraction with the state election just months away.

A transcript of the secret recording, posted on a political blog run by former Melbourne University official Andrew Landeryou, reveals Mr Rowswell is allegedly heard referring to the Australasian Union of Jewish Students’ Michael Gubieski, as a “little Jewish (expletive)”.

Mr Rowswell yesterday told the Herald Sun the comments had been improperly recorded and it was “offensive, insulting and untrue” to claim he was anti-Semitic.

“During a bitter, private discussion of factional university politics, where gratuitous comments were traded, I used crude language,” Mr Rowswell said.

“It was not religiously motivated and I have apologised and my apology has been accepted by the person involved.”

Mr Rowswell said he was a strong supporter of Israel and was a member of two Jewish student organisations.

“What is offensive is that the notion of anti-Semitic inferences has been used in a partisan political way designed for no other purpose than to score an internecine political point,” he said.

Club treasurer Courtney Dixon is alleged to have commented that the returning officer would boot out any ticket that incited tension over Israel and Lebanon and that “we should incite something.”

Mr Dixon agreed yesterday he was the voice on the tape but would not answer any specific questions, saying he was busy.

Liberal Club president Andrew Campbell is alleged to have said at the meeting: “We’re not gonna go out and attack Jews — just Gubieski.”

Mr Campbell’s only comment yesterday was that he would have to check whether it was his voice on the tape.

The row centres on the [University] of Melbourne Student Union elections, which begin today.

Previously, the Union of Jewish Students and the Liberal Club were allies but fell out this year.

Mr Gubieski confirmed he was the person referred to in Mr Rowswell’s comments.

“All I can say is that it is obviously very disappointing but I trust the Liberal Party will know how to take care of it,” he said.

“I do believe I have been vilified but I am more concerned about the cultural problems at the Liberal Club.”

Liberal Party state director Julian Sheezel, who is Jewish, said an investigation had been launched.

“If those remarks are correct, then I am appalled and disgusted,” he said.

The second article from The Age goes into much more depth:

‘An unholy alliance’
Barney Zwartz and Adam Morton
The Age
September 4, 2006

Anti-Semitism is reportedly on the rise across university campuses. Has political opportunism unleashed the devil?

Daniel Wyner is used to robust debate. A senior figure in the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, he moves around Melbourne campuses arguing for Israel. But he was taken aback recently when a Monash lecturer confronted him, almost incoherent with rage, and called him a Zionist oppressor and f—ing racist.

“He kept going on his rant and rave. He wasn’t Muslim or Arab. He may or may not have been a member of the arts faculty, and I may or may not have followed him back into the office to find that out.” The incident highlighted what many Australian Jews claim is a distinct rise in temperature on campus but the hostility has not come from Muslims.

“I’ve been at La Trobe, Deakin and Melbourne too. The problems, the anti-Semitism, the vilification we feel as students on campus are coming almost entirely from the left… Socialist Alternative (a left-wing student group), they just latch on to a cause which isn’t theirs to try to make it their own by twisting it,” Wyner says.

Jewish groups claim some of the more radical left-wing groups are trying to exploit tensions in the Middle East to foment trouble on campus and increase their own numbers. An example, Wyner says, was the recent visit to Melbourne University by the Israeli ambassador: Socialist Alternative members disrupted the meeting and were asked to leave by the Lebanese students’ society.

In Sydney last month, a Jewish student was pushed to the ground and others spat on. At Monash, a Young Liberal member staffing a stall supporting Israel was grabbed by the throat and threatened, while the table was kicked over.

At Melbourne University, security staff had to keep apart the Students Against War and Racism and a group of mostly Liberal Club members waving Israeli flags. Tensions flared, insults were traded and observers said only a handful of guards prevented the conflict becoming physical. The vice-chancellors of both Melbourne and Sydney universities called for calm, saying that while vigorous debate was acceptable, vilification was not.

Grahame Leonard, the president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, says July had the most anti-Semitic incidents since records began in 1945. At 141, the total was 60 per cent higher than the previous record.

“Generally it’s low severity — phone calls, graffiti, hate emails — but there are some violent incidents. The big growth was in Victoria, and many of these incidents were on campus.”

In Sydney some Jewish students feel so intimidated that they are wearing hats over their kippahs (skull caps). In Melbourne they are more defiant, but they are concerned.

“There’s a real feeling of threat,” says Deon Kamien, Victorian president of the Union of Jewish Students. “It’s not something I can put in words. A lot of students who would feel very comfortable wearing a kippah or T-shirt with Hebrew words on it now feel they are being targeted as Jews — not supporters of Israel, but Jews. When they walk past socialist stalls (on campus) they are called f—ing Jews.”

Kamien says that where previous conflicts have been about politics, this time it’s turned racial. “The leftists have completely blurred the line between politics and religion and have misunderstood the situation. They’ve got hung up on the Middle East and absolutely hung up on Jews. What we are seeing is nothing more than anti-Semitism.”

Greg Weinstein, national president of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, says “the left” are uneducated and base their arguments purely on passions rather than fact. “They are misusing what’s happening on the other side of the world to promote their own cause, which is shocking. I don’t think they are gaining credibility.”

It is not just the students, and not just Australia. Ted Lapkin of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council wrote an essay for Quadrant magazine recently, criticising what he terms anti-Semitism by left-wing academics.

“Australian campuses are like most Western universities, but more so,” Lapkin says.

Jewish community leaders detect a rising tide of anti-Semitism throughout the West. They pinpoint a couple of key reasons: the inoculation effect of the Holocaust is disappearing over time, so that dinner-table anti-Semitism is re-emerging. People who don’t like Jews feel more comfortable about expressing it.

Second, they say, Israel provides a convenient excuse. They accept that most criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, but say it can provide a convenient cover for attacking Jews generally. A red-line warning for the Jewish community is when critics compare Israel to the Nazis. You don’t use a Nazi slur if you know what the Nazis did, and if you do know and use it, that’s inexcusable, they believe.

Jews ask why British university lecturers insisted that Israeli academics sign a statement dissociating themselves from Israel’s “apartheid” policies if they wished to teach in Britain. Is Israel worse than China, or Sudan or North Korea or Iran?

The answer, they are convinced, is that latent anti-Semitism is resurfacing. A Christian observer at Melbourne University, who did not want to be named, certainly thinks that’s the explanation in this city. He says “Jew-baiting” is rising, as opponents try to turn anti-Israel sentiment to anti-Jewish. “Socialists bait Jewish students. The intention is to get Jewish students to fight back so they can use them. It’s a deliberate incitement of people’s emotions to generate conflict.”

Socialist Alternative tactics are outlined in an in-house publication.

Discussing an incident at Melbourne, when a socialist stall was overturned, Daniel L. says the best response is to “immediately make a huge fuss — denounce them loudly, screaming ‘you’re a murderer, you support George Bush’s war, you support killing innocent people in the Middle East, you’re fascist scum’ and so forth. When we did this it had a huge polarising effect with people coming up afterwards to show their support. Often this was from the point of view of freedom of speech, rather than a willingness to support fighting Israel. But that doesn’t change the fact that it is excellent terrain for us.”

One writer, Vashti, says “two young Lebanese guys came up and asked if they could beat up the Zionists”.

Daniel says of this: “They knew which side they were on and were willing to fight. We do not want to start fights with the Liberals ourselves, but if Lebanese people do it’s a good thing and we’re f—ing well with them.”

Melbourne University Student Union president Jessie Giles says the campus has been polarised. “Socialist Alternative in particular have been responsible for whipping up some of this sentiment, and I also think the Melbourne University Liberal Club is equally to blame on the other side.” The Socialist Alternative group admit they used the Middle East conflict to recruit members but deny that they are racist.

Vashti Kenway, a Socialist Alternative member at Melbourne and organiser of Students Against War and Racism rallies, says: “I’m pretty unashamed about saying that I think it would be good if there were more socialists in Australia who were against all the horrors of the Howard Government.”

She argues that it’s wrong and lazy to accuse critics of Israel of anti-Semitism. “We take a firm stand against all forms of racism, and that includes anti-Semitism. No one from Socialist Alternative has made any racists slurs against anyone.”

Colleen Bolger, Socialist Alternative organiser at Monash, says the Australasian Union of Jewish Students conflates anti-zionism with anti-Semitism. She says students supporting Israel have surrounded socialist stalls on campus, yelling “terrorist”.

Is she misusing the conflict for political ends? “I’d reject the idea that we shouldn’t be recruiting people who agree with us. This is a perfectly legitimate thing for a political organisation to do. We certainly don’t create the wars, we stand up against them.”

Has the left used racism? This is being debated inside the left, as shown by an exchange in late July on a group email list run by the National Union of Students. Chris Di Pasquale of the RMIT Student Union wrote that Zionists at Melbourne and Monash universities “felt the need to reassert their racism and fetish for genocide and mass slaughter of Arab people”, calling security and the student union to shut down socialist stalls.

National Union of Students president Rose Jackson wrote that this was a racist remark that would be extremely hurtful to some people in the student movement. While she opposed the war in Lebanon, “you do not need to resort to this type of distressingly hateful name-calling to show people that you are left-wing and radical. There will come a point (if it has not already been reached) where suddenly people in the left will feel they can get away with anything when talking about Israel and the Israeli people. Where no comments or insults are off-limits.”

As she wrote, she knew she was inviting attack. She didn’t have to wait long. Heidi Claus, the union’s Victorian education officer, replied: “WHAT THE!!!!!!!! Rose Jackson you are an apologist for the racist state of Israel and fundamentally uninformed.”

Claus claimed that the apartheid state of Israel was set up on the blood of the Palestinian people, and there would never be peace while Zionism or Israel continued to exist. It was Jackson, in fact, who was racist because she equated the Jewish people with Zionism which itself was anti-Semitic. She concluded: “I demand an apology from you for your racist filth and an apology to Chris and Socialist Alternative for your blatant slander.”

Muslims are distancing themselves. Chaaban Omran, national president of the Federation of Australian Muslim Students and Youth, says some left groups can be too aggressive. “They are using this momentum, the build-up of mistake after mistake (by Israel). At the end of the day they have their own agenda. We are quite happy to work with them about Lebanon or Palestine, but not the extreme views of being aggressive. We say there’s an intellectual way to do it.”

Omran says Islamic societies on campus are extremely cautious because they are so aware of keeping Muslim extremists out. “There are some Muslims and far-left students who see issues in black and white, but we try to promote that there’s a middle path.” He says that when Islamic societies on campus have a website with a forum, which can’t be controlled, extremist views can be posted.

“But you don’t know who’s putting it on, students or people from outside wanting to cause trouble. Usually a couple of people reply immediately saying that’s not the way, or we send an email saying that.” “Extreme”, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. “We’re not about to stop anyone from saying people in Lebanon have the right to defend themselves, but we haven’t had calls for jihad.”

Omran says there has not been a single report of Muslim students being intimidated, but Muslims are nevertheless increasingly frustrated. “They feel the world is walking all over them, that Muslim blood is very cheap, of less importance, that there’s a blatant attempt to demonise anyone of Islamic faith by politicians or certain parts of the media. This can only lead to radicalisation, and we should look forward to more extremism.”

Australia needs to tackle the cause, rather than the symptom, by fixing its foreign policy. Greg Weinstein thinks the religious groups on campus are providing the right model. When the Middle East conflict broke out, he says, the national presidents of the Jewish, Muslim, Catholic and Baha’i student associations issued a joint statement calling for unity and prayers for peace. Over the past few weeks he and Muslim president Kaled El-Hassan have become friends; the pair met for lunch last week and solved a few of the world’s problems.

Barney Zwartz is religion editor and Adam Morton is higher education reporter.

More later…

See also : ‘Australia’s Israel Question’ : a speech by (Justice) Alan Goldberg at the Melbourne Writers’ Festival, August 27, 2006

Posted in Media, State / Politics, Student movement, Trot Guide, War on Terror | 5 Comments

Josh Outta Jail!

‘Bail granted for journalist Josh Wolf’
Bob Egelko
San Francisco Chronicle
August 31, 2006

(08-31) 15:46 PDT SAN FRANCISCO — Josh Wolf, a freelance journalist who has been jailed since Aug. 1 for refusing to turn over videos of a political protest to a federal grand jury, was granted bail today by a federal appeals court…

Links to commentary and reportage in the Australian (corporate / state) media on the first blogger to be targeted by US Federal authorities for not cooperating with a grand jury below :

Posted in Anarchism, Media, State / Politics, War on Terror | Leave a comment

Little Rich Working Class Oi Boy (Part 2)

Jesus Christ. Hit a couple of young black girls with a metal police baton while you’re shouting racist slurs – and get sentenced to community service in a homeless shelter?

Oh, I may have left out something relevant. Did I mention Josh Spaulding, the 28-year-old [bonehead] (aka “Jazz”), is a Boston blueblood and his dad’s a Boston cultural maven?

He’s also the grandson of the former head of the Massachusetts GOP, who ran for the Senate in 1970. Having the right relatives sure seems to help…

Susan Madrak concludes by asking “I just wonder if angry young men without such blue blood – or such very white skin – get the same understanding treatment”.

Kinda like how the neo-Nazi piece of shit Ross Hack got away with murder really.

Posted in Anti-fascism, State / Politics | Leave a comment