I’ve just got off the bat phone to a drunken Agent Gerbil, who assures me that the following footage of yesterday’s New Reich formation at the APEC rally and march is indeed genuine.
I, however, have my suspicions…
I’ve just got off the bat phone to a drunken Agent Gerbil, who assures me that the following footage of yesterday’s New Reich formation at the APEC rally and march is indeed genuine.
I, however, have my suspicions…
Bins. Wheelie Bins.
Following on from the earlier decision by three Justices of the NSW Supreme Court not to allow three (suspected) terrorists to walk along certain streets in Sydney comes this further blow for Truth, Justice and the American President’s Right-of-Way:
Police swoop on ‘wheelie bin boom box’
Sean Cusick
ninemsn
September 8, 2007As the APEC protest in the heart of Sydney wound down without major incident, one activist was receiving what he regarded to be more than his fair share of police attention. Chris Ward took a wheelie bin converted into a stereo to the march — and the contraption caught the attention of the gathered security forces. “I’ve been searched three times today for having a wheelie bin sound system,” Mr Ward said. “As you can see, there’s [nothing] in it but speakers, an amplifier and a battery.” Mr Ward says he was searched for half an hour on each occasion, and once extra police had to be called in after a crowd of activists surrounded the search team.
Police within the Sydney CBD have special APEC powers which allow them to detain and search anyone without cause. Dale Mills, a “Human Rights Monitor” present at the march, described the search as an overreaction. “In my opinion, that was just an illegal search,” Mr Mills said. “That’s the sort of aggressive attitude … that provokes problems at protests.”
Still, while the protest as a whole was characterised by the absence of any physical confrontations with police, converting Tinsel Town into Pig City has had the inevitable consequences: for others. At this stage, perhaps 17 or 18 individuals have been arrested by police, and charged with the usual assortment of infractions, none of which have, to this point — and despite the mountains of propaganda spewed forth by the police / state and ideological state apparatus — involved the rape and/or murder of large numbers of innocent civilians. (Unlike, say, the War on Terror™. In Iraq. Or Chechnya. Or by way of the Chinese occupation of Tibet. Or…) Or as riot squad commander Steven Cullen told Sydney’s Supreme Court: “Police lines will come under attack”. As it happens, the closest this came to being true was the apparent use of a dart and an iron bar, by one protester, against one member of the rent-a-mob.
There is a lot of intellectual waffle used in this tiresome campaign to try to get the average citizen to accept the idea that it is normal, even acceptable, for gays to marry and have children. I’m sure that most people would agree that there is in fact something very fundamentally wrong with this idea. If asked, I’m sure that they would say that on an intuitive level those who also harbour these ideas are bordering on mental disturbance.
~ Gavin Begbie, Byron Bay, The Northern Rivers Echo, December 21, 2006
No doubt more details of this offence will emerge as police proceed to feed the waiting chooks.
Note that Cullen claimed that the prospect of chaos on the streets of Sydney was what justified the police application to the courts — smugly agreed upon by the three liberal Justices — to prevent a number of citizens from attending today’s protests without being immediately arrested. Alex Bainbridge, spokesperson for the DSP’s Stop Bush coalition — obviously not a big music fan — is reported to have praised police for their conduct:
Mr Bainbridge said protest organisers did not take issue with the way police conducted themselves. “On the whole, we don’t have big problems, but we think the security operation which today they were a part of, has been exaggerated and overblown.”
On the other hand:
Mr Scipione said he was not aware of any issue with police failing to wear ID badges, as had been alleged by some protesters. No direction had been given for them not to wear ID, but it was something that would be looked into, Mr Scipione said.
Which is the standard li(n)e used by police, for whom this has become standard practice at any event at which they may decide to employ violence and to assault The People What Cause Unrest (AAP, Police show force at APEC, 17 arrests, Sydney Morning Herald, September 8, 2007).
Finally — and rather oddly — Miranda Devine, of all people, recounts the rather extraordinary “FORCIBLE arrest, handcuffing and jailing of a respectable, bespectacled, middle-aged accountant in a Hawaiian shirt” (Pumped-up cops are stepping over the thin blue line, Sydney Morning Herald, September 9, 2007) which is worth reading, especially for this line: ‘You can see police dragging Greg face-down onto the footpath. One is yelling: “Stop resisting! Stop resisting!”‘
Devine a critic of police brutality? Hardly. “Greg [the accountant/terrorist in question] and [his missus] Sophie are my friends of 14 years. My husband and I are godparents to their daughter, Isadora, 3.”
Ooops.
Nazis. Neo-Nazis.

In an ironic twist (that will be completely lost on the hacks working for the state and corporate sector), the only mob threatening or — more precisely — playing on the spectre of violence, was a small group of fascists dressed as ‘anarchists’, who took advantage of the absolutely massive police state presence to carry banners reading ‘Australia, Free Nation or Sheep Station?’, ‘Globalisation is Genocide!’ and ‘Power to the People — Not Political Parties’ and to look — as the Very Reverend Monsignor Geoffrey Baron might say — like sfools.
Thus, in addition to attracting somewhere between 3 and 10,000 people to the rally and march organised by the leftist Stop Bush coalition, in Sydney this morning the APEC summit also attracted a small number (between 20 and 30) of neo-Nazis. The fascist mob was tightly formed, dressed in black, and their clothing was intended to disguise their faces. In other words, the fascists formed a small ‘black bloc’. On Stormfront, a poster writes that:
I was just sent this PM by someone who claims to have been at the APEC demo as part of the [New Right] contingent:
“[N]one of us were arrested. [T]he police surrounded us not because we were a threat, but to protect us from the sea of [M]arxist sewerage around us. We co-operated with police instruction[s] at all times and we left as they brought up the riot squad and the water cannon because the red scum were causing trouble further up in the march.
I tell you the truth, we hurt them more today just by being there [than] any amount of physical confrontation. It was like one of those old horror movies when somebody sprays a vampire with holy water[;] they were foaming and writhing because of us, because our cause is righteous.
At one point they started chanting about fascists or something, so we chanted back, calling them [N]azis[. T]his had them most confused[;] they stared us with a vacant, [slack-jawed] look and had to retreat and started chanting further away from us.
There were so many people we wanted to hit today, but everybody ignored their childish provocations[. W]ell done to those who attended and congratulations to the New Right for organising this ground-breaking step forward in Australian Nationalism.”
John Ferguson in the Herald Sun (NSW police teach Victoria how to deal with protests, September 9, 2007) writes:
At the start of the march, police became concerned when a group of anarchists clashed with neo-Nazi protesters who had gathered at the back of the kilometre-long protest gathering in the heart of the city. Rows of police were ordered to surround the neo-Nazis and told to arrest anyone who acted violently.
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Danielle Teutsch and Daniel Dasey state (Protesters no match as police rule streets, September 9, 2007) “A group of about 20 black-garbed men were separated from the rally by police after protesters accused them of being neo-Nazis intent on provocation.”
So, hardly an unmitigated triumph — the neo-Nazis were soon sussed — but still a success as far as the New Reich / Notional-Anarchists are concerned. After all, they managed to use the platform provided by the protest to announce their existence to the world (as far as I’m aware, this is their first organised attendance at a public protest) and to escape unscathed, job done. Whether or not this ‘intervention’ will mean others begin to pay them any more attention is difficult to say. I suspect not. On the other hand, I think, especially given the near-total collapse of the Australia First Party, the group will quite possibly attract more support from existing elements of the far right, and come to constitute an early twenty-first century version of National Action, and to fill the same niche NA did in terms of constituting an extra-parliamentary radical right-wing organisation. The ‘left’ in Sydney, meanwhile, will most likely remain inactive and largely clueless, at least until such time as they believe themselves standing more to gain from confronting the neo-Nazis than they do to lose.
Business as usual, in other words.
http://www.newrightausnz.blogspot.com/
http://www.newrightausnz.org/
Food, Sex and Ewe.
And speaking of business…
INTERSTATE prostitutes were brought into Sydney to help service the 300 per cent spike in brothel business during APEC, the Adult Business Association (ABA) says. APEC-themed specials on offer at Sydney brothels included the Condi Combo, the UN Duo and the Presidential Platter. “It’s been going gangbusters,” NSW spokesman for the ABA Chris Seage told Fairfax newspapers. “Businesses that were banking on a 200 per cent increase in business have done better than that with it up by 300 per cent. “There have been secret service agents, trade envoys, but no Putins yet.” Mr Seage said suburban brothels were also getting extra work from locals deciding to stay closer to home during APEC.

Huh.
Word on the streets of Sydney is that the New Reich (‘New Right’) has gathered together a mob and is distributing fascist propaganda under the guise of ‘national anarchism’. Under the watchful gaze of ex-NPD and ex-ONP member Welf Herfurth (a German businessman who relocated to Sydney in 1987), the group is present at the APEC summit demonstrations, where it is distributing (or attempting to distribute) anti-anarchist propaganda.
Cheeky!
More details later. In the meantime, a garbled account is available via:
APEC protesters confront police / Arrests, injuries during APEC march / Blah blah blah
Ean Higgins [and Dan Box and Godwin knows who else]
The Australian
September 08, 2007PROTESTERS at APEC gathered in pouring rain and police were bracing for expected violence by dissident groups today.
The protesters gathered outside Sydney’s Town Hall station this morning.
As they prepared to march, police formed a solid line three deep to block off George Street.
Behind them, four police buses blocked George, their wheels covered with steel grates.
Police started forming lines confronting the [Notional Anarchist] group.
A police officer told his men, “This is the trouble here, these are the ones who are violent.”
There were about 30 of the [Notional Anarchists], who described themselves as the New Right, all dressed in black hooded jackets. Some of the group wore dark sunglasses and all had bandanas around their faces…
The silly wankers didn’t take part in the march, apparently, preferring to scurry off home early. News reports also suggest that one of the wallies may have been arrested; then again, news reports also claimed Sydney would be on fire by this stage.
In other news, as predicted, in addition to luxury accommodation, meals, inner Sydney and a police state, the 21 heads of state have been given Driza-Bones and Akubras in which to have their $105,000 holiday snaps taken:
World leaders to receive Driza-Bones
AAP
September 8, 2007Sydney’s official APEC outfit has been revealed – tailor-made, knee-length Driza-Bone coats made of the original brown material and spiced up with a contrasting colour for each of the 21 world leaders.
The leaders are about to walk out on to the steps of the Opera House for their official photograph in the national costume, chosen by Prime Minister John Howard and his wife Janette.
The so-called “silly shirt” is the highlight of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders’ meeting, with host nations over the years choosing outfits from batik shirts to silk coats to wear in the official photograph.
Most pundits had expected Mr and Mrs Howard to choose a Driza-Bone – the iconic Australian stockman’s attire – for the outfit.
Each leader has been given a choice of contrast colours for their coat from the range of slate blue, mustard yellow, red ochre and eucalyptus green.
The jackets have the APEC logo embroidered on them and each leader will also be given an Akubra felt hat.
The leaders’ lunch was held at the prestigious Guillaume at Bennelong restaurant.*
They dined on an entree of barramundi with endives, mushrooms, pearl of vegetables, yabbies and scallops, followed by roasted saddle of lamb with field mushrooms, kipfler potatoes, confit of tomato and thyme jus.
Lunch was to end with a selection of Australian fruit and cheese.
*Review from the Sydney Morning Herald Good Food Guide 2007
Guillaume at Bennelong
18/20
Three-hat restaurant
Good Wine list
“Surrender to the world-class view, to an iconic masterpiece from a Danish legend and to legendary food from a French master. Guillaume Brahimi delivers a decadent, Dionysian experience that makes this site a modern wonder for reasons culinary as well as architectural. A recent make-over has made it all the more spectacular. Feasting under the Opera House’s cavernous concrete ribs can feel surreal and perhaps the food can be a little too rib-stickingly rich, but this is true fine-dining theatre. Roasted marron wrapped in proscuitto with risotto, veal jus and truffle is comfort food for kings. Kangaroo Island chicken breast is breathtakingly moist beneath a crisp skin, with duck foie gras ravioli. Whole books could be written about the huge wagyu beef rib eye for two, cooked on the bone and served with field mushrooms and merlot sauce – plus that wonderfully, wickedly rich Paris mash. Superb service under Craig Hemmings and sommelier Stuart Halliday high wires between expert and charming. Grand Marnier souffle with chocolate sorbet is a symphonic finale.”


The beginning of the end for the Government of Australian Tory Prime Minister John HoWARd was in April, when the multi-millionaire leader of the Opposition Kevin Rudd (Opposition being a purely formal expression in this case) received Rupert Murdoch’s blessing to become his new regional manager in Australia. Confirmation of the end, however, has come with United States’ CEO George W Bush’s description of HoWARd as his “battler buddy” (Big John is Bush’s ‘battler’ buddy, AAP/AP, Sydney Morning Herald, September 7, 2007); the shift from ‘deputy sheriff’ to this less formal term a reflection, perhaps, of the growing affection Bush has for his loyal Australian ‘mate’. Unfortunately, while the Australian public, after 11 years of largely uncontested rule, has little regard for HoWARd, it has even less for Bush. Thus according to a Galaxy Poll commissioned by the Medical Association for the Prevention of War, 52% of Australians believe George to be the worst US President in history.
Not content with being a grossly unpopular and massively expensive inconvenience, however, Bush has taken the opportunity of the, er, ‘APEC’ summit, to further confirm widespread speculation that, somewhere in Texas, a village is missing its idiot. Thus according to The Times:
President Bush not only muddled the international meeting he was attending this week – he also thought he was on the other side of the world. Speaking in Sydney at the Asia Pacific Economic Council (Apec) summit of world leaders, Mr Bush thanked “Austrian” Prime Minister, John Howard, in front of a summit of business leaders, for being a gracious “Opec” host…
Toward the end of his speech Mr Bush turned towards the Australian Prime Minister and thanked him for being such a gracious host during the “Opec” summit. Almost immediately realising his mistake, Mr Bush corrected himself, saying: “I mean the Apec summit.” He then said: “I have been invited to the Opec summit next year. The Apec summit.” The stumble brought good-natured laughter from the audience of top business leaders from Asian and Pacific rim nations. But White House officials accompanying Mr Bush in Sydney later said that the President had not been invited to the summit of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) next year. And no it was not another gaffe, they said, he had been joking. As if that was not enough though, Mr Bush also botched the host country’s name, referring to Mr Howard’s visit to Iraq in 2006 as a thank you to “the Austrian troops there”…
Bernard Lagan, Bush gaffe cap calamitous Apec summit, September 7, 2007
Bush’s gaffes echo one rather embarrassing — for HoWARd — admission George made four years ago. In February 2003, Bush announced that Australian troops would be joining his ‘Coalition of the Killing’ in the commission of war crimes in Iraq. This was embarrassment — and how — for the battler buddy, as at that point HoWARd had failed to inform the Australian people of the President’s — which is to say the Deputy Sheriff’s — decision.
But if Bush is simply the idiot son of an asshole, what does that make HoWARd?
In other news…
In the eastern state of Saxony in Germany, according to a recent poll, the social democratic SPD is even less popular than the neo-Nazi NPD (Spiegel Online, September 7, 2007). While supposedly ‘shocking’ news, it should be read keeping in mind that Saxony has long been a stronghold for the far right, and in acknowledgement of the embrace of neo-liberal ideology by the SPD. In fact, a similar situation could easily (re-)emerge in Australia, especially after the ALP demonstrates its own similarity to the Tories after it wins office at the next Federal election.
Speaking of Australia — and neo-Nazism — Andrew McCathie, writing in The Age, claims that “GERMANY’S neo-Nazi movement has discovered a new and powerful instrument to communicate its vicious and violent message: music” (Neo-Nazis use music to spread vicious message, September 8, 2007). McCathie further claims that “Despite being banned in Germany, music from neo-Nazi groups such as Landser (Foot Soldier), Race War, Power and Honour pump out often shoddily produced CDs”.
A few points:
First, the German far right has been using music as propaganda, and as a means to recruit alienated white male youths as foot soldiers, for decades. In fact, one of the world’s leading racist, right-wing labels, Rock-O-Rama, was (re-)established in Germany by German fascist businessman Herbert Egoldt over 20 years ago. When that label was forced to fold in 1994, Hebert helped to establish another label in Belgium, Pure Impact, which continues to distribute racist and fascist musical product throughout Europe and the world. Secondly, while the production and distribution of overtly neo-Nazi music in Germany is under a formal ban, the largest market for US-based producers and distributors of same is Germany, and has been since a major crackdown in the mid-’90s. So, nothing really all that newsworthy in this sense. Finally, while Landser is indeed a well-known neo-Nazi not-so-pop group, I think by ‘Power and Honour’ McCathie actually means to refer to ‘Blood & Honour’, the international neo-Nazi network…
More to the point, while B&H is banned in Germany (and Spain), in Australia, it’s been organising semi-annual gatherings for well over a decade. In 2006, for example, B&H organised a gig to commemorate the death of B&H founder Ian Stuart Donaldson at a Fitzroy pub, The Birmingham Hotel. On the night of the gig, a local woman was assaulted by some of those in attendance. This year, the gig is scheduled to take place just five weeks from now, on Saturday, October 13. Performing at the gig will be an as-yet undisclosed act from either Europe or possibly North America, but also, and most interestingly, a local, Melbourne band called Fortress (led by Scott McGuinness) and another, seminal neo-Nazi rock band called Quick & the Dead. “Interestingly” because within fascist circles at least, Fortress has been extremely popular, especially in Germany, and played many times to thousands of adoring boneheads. Further, the band has announced that this will be their final show. The prospect of a performance by the Quick & the Dead, on the other hand, is interesting because it was the first neo-Nazi skinhead (bonehead) band to form in (Perth) Australia back in the early 1980s; secondly, because one of its members, Murray Holmes, also played with Skrewdriver — without doubt the most infamous neo-Nazi rock ‘n’ roll band of all time, and in many ways the group responsible for kick-starting the movement as a whole.
Unfortunately, to this point, the only corporate/state media coverage the issue has received in Australia of late has been confined to a handful of articles in The Melbourne Times (also a Fairfax publication) regarding last year’s ISD gig. The inroads that fascist, neo-Nazi, and racist ideology is making into the local punk subculture — whether in Melbourne, Sydney or Perth — has subsequently been completely ignored, and a number of attempts to gather opposition to this development met with either hostility or only token, and largely covert, expressions of support. Thus The Birmy continues to host ‘punk’ bands, local ‘punk’ distros continue to sell neo-Nazi music, and even local ‘skinhead’ bands — most prominently, Bulldog Spirit — continue to contain neo-Nazi members. (And the problem of neo-Nazi infiltration into local punk and skinhead subcultures is also mirrored in the local heavy metal milieu, where a very similar, and profoundly conservative, political ethic dominates.)
You wouldn’t read about it.
You can, however, read about the ways in which boneheads are happy to return the favour if their activities are tolerated, and/or, as in this case, prove to be useful to the state.
Skinhead Russia
Anton Grishin
Moscow News
September 6, 2007Few things can shock society today. One of them was a video recently posted on the Internet that appears to show the execution of two men. The three-minute clip, posted by a LiveJournal.com user, signed “antigipsyone,” on August 12, shows a Dagestani (from the North Caucasus) and a Tajik (from Central Asia) kneeling on the ground with their arms and legs tied up. A swastika is displayed in the background. “We were arrested by Russian national socialists,” they say in voices trembling with fear, after which one of them is beheaded and the other is shot in the back of the head.
Police investigators are currently examining whether the video showed a real or staged execution. Preliminary examination suggested that it was probably staged. Whatever the case, the video highlighted the neo-Nazi threat in Russia.
A Strange Legacy
Russia’s skinhead movement appeared in the early 1990s, amidst that era’s social and economic turmoil. As often happens, a subculture that comes from the West changes beyond recognition in Russia, and that was true for the skinheads.
The past year saw a record number of crimes that law enforcement agencies blamed on skinheads. An attack on an environmental camp in southeast Siberia, which left one person dead and seven injured, and that grisly video both occurred in the past two months alone. But during the year there [have been] other murders, pogroms, raids, and provocations. The authorities and society as a whole are confronted with the question of how to stop a force that is gaining momentum all the time.
Skinheads began as a working-class subculture in Britain in the 1960s. Originally it had nothing to do with color, race, religion, or national origin. In subsequent decades, the skinhead subculture spread to other parts of Europe, North America and other continents.
In the 1970s, both neo-Nazi and anti-Nazi organizations in the UK and the United States looked on skinheads as potential cannon fodder. Youth culture, unencumbered by any bans and ready to follow any shiny new idea, started developing along several lines. The Neo-Nazis came to be known as boneheads, while those skinheads who identified with the original 1960s skinhead subculture divided into anti-Nazis and anarchists.
The anti-Nazi movement became known as SHARP (Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice). The anarchist movement developed into RASH (Red and Anarchist Skinheads), a left-wing anti-racist, anti-fascist skinhead group.
Well… sorta…
The history of the early skinhead movements shows that boneheads in particular became victims of political games. Exploiting youth culture’s responsiveness to new ideas for political purposes is a common practice. And only fascists were able to unite a critical mass of skinheads under a single flag.
Today, proactive, assertive anti-Nazi propaganda in Europe and North America has had a positive effect: fascism as an ideology failed to acquire a following large enough to cause yet another social crisis.
Skinheads a la Russe
The breakup of the Soviet Union and the subsequent crisis created a generally negative psychological environment for many people but also an ideological vacuum that emerged with the collapse of the Communist ideal, which could be considered a national idea. Since nature abhors a vacuum, it was filled with trendy borrowings from the West. Young men with shaved heads appeared in Moscow together with the first democrats. In 1992, they numbered in the dozens.
Yet by 1994, there were already thousands of skinheads. The reason was not just the social crisis but also the position of the ruling establishment, which showed that violence is a legitimate option in any dispute. The start of the military campaign in Chechnya strengthened the nationalist mood among teenagers. An external enemy was found, and many thousands of school-age people were ready to follow the “Russia for Russians!” slogan.
Ignorance and resentment, as well as the scaling down of anti-Nazi propaganda, were major factors that contributed to the evolution of the “Russian skinhead.” This type had nothing to do with traditional skinheads or SHARPs or [RASHes]. The majority of Russian skinheads became boneheads – extremely nationalist skinheads, advocating violence and racial intolerance.
As in the UK, neo-Nazis needed a social group from which to recruit new members. Aggressive soccer fans were an ideal recruiting ground. First, many were already accustomed to violence. Second, educational levels among them are generally very low. Many soccer hooligans eventually [came] to embrace neo-Nazi ideas.
Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies categorically refused to treat crimes committed by boneheads as ethnically motivated, or hate crimes. The opposing force – the Russian answer to SHARPs and RASHes, which rallied under Antifa banner – was so small that it wasn’t a threat. [In Europe, especially in the UK, militant anti-fascism advocates the use of violence against fascists. Within the anti-fascist movement, the term militant anti-fascism is often used in contrast to liberal anti-fascism; fascists often use violence and depend on a physical presence in the streets, and militant anti-fascists believe that an equal counterweight is essential to stop fascism, and that fascism should be tackled by communities rather than by the state. – Ed.]
When boneheads became aware of their strength, they launched large-scale actions. That included raids on outdoor food and clothes markets, street riots in downtown Moscow during a Russia-Japan soccer match, and an ongoing wave of violence and murders.
Antifa vs. Boneheads
Until recently, the government’s efforts against the neo-Nazis produced almost no result. Putting a few dozen people behind bars is not effective. Meanwhile, representatives of the world’s major racist and neo-Nazi movements, parties and groups, such [as the] Ku Klux Klan and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (a Nazi party) were freely coming to Russia to share their experience with local youth movements. The only organization that is officially outlawed in Russia is the Russian National Unity, which disappeared years ago.
The current stage of the struggle is linked with the implementation of the Law on Countering Extremis[m]. The case of Maxim “Tesak” (“Hatchet”) Martsinkevich, the leader of Format 18, a bonehead group, appears to demonstrate that Nazi slogans may not be chanted in public. Tesak was charged with inciting ethnic hatred and threatening to commit violence during a debate organized by democratic youth groups at a Moscow club in February. Martsinkevich arrived with about 20 followers, made Nazi salutes, and threatened “to slaughter the liberals.” A Moscow court convicted three of his associates in June for the murder of a member of an anti-fascist organization.
The dual murder video footage shows that it is also against the law to spread materials fomenting ethnic hatred.
But does the realization of the extent of the problem come too late? How did Tesak’s arrest affect the boneheads? They regard him as a hero who suffered for the truth. As for the grisly video, quite a few people saw the brutal murder as a positive step in the struggle against illegal immigration.
Meanwhile, Format 18’s Web site, which featured much illegal material, was shut down through the efforts of the Antifa movement, not the authorities. But the anti-fascist movement is still regarded as unpredictable and uncontrollable, and therefore, the authorities refuse to notice it or use it in fighting neo-Nazism.
[In fact, it represses it.]
Even worse is that often it is hard to tell a bonehead from an anti-Nazi. The only distinguishing features of Antifa skinheads are an image of a Trojan warrior’s helmet on the jacket and red boot laces[?]. As for the boneheads, they use white laces and WP (White Power) and 88 (Heil Hitler) patches. It can be difficult to see these distinctive marks, especially from a bureaucrat’s armchair.
It is noteworthy that neo-Nazis in Russia are not declaring their political ambitions or attempting to put themselves on the map. Perhaps they realize that their time has not come yet. They will not have to wait very long, however, unless new, effective anti-fascism laws are adopted.
Here is yet another dark touch to an already grim picture: according to Oleg Yelnikov, the head of the Interior Ministry press service, his agency does not have reliable data on the number of skinheads in Russia. Unofficially, however, at the start of 2007, there were believed to be at least 100,000 skinheads in the RF.
Commentary to follow; in the meantime…
A man wanted in connection with [G20] violence was arrested in Sydney last night by APEC Investigation Squad detectives. Akin Sari, 29, is the subject of two outstanding warrants after failing to appear in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on 16 charges, including riot and affray, unlawful assembly, reckless conduct, criminal damage and theft. The Melbourne court has previously heard allegations Sari violently attacked and smashed the windows of a police brawler van outside the G20 venue. Mr Scipione said Sari had been on the police exclusion list and his arrest was “significant”. “This serves as a warning to anyone on that list, we are serious about your inclusion on that list because at the end of the day you are on there because we anticipate you will cause trouble,” Mr Scipione said.
Anti-APEC protests in Sydney today were largely peaceful, but Prime Minister John Howard late today scolded protesters for failing to see the positive social and economical benefits of APEC. In his closing address to the APEC business summit, Mr Howard said: “I’ve said on many occasions over the last week, that those who demonstrate at a gathering such as APEC, in the name of relieving world poverty, just pause for a moment and understand the contribution that economic growth makes to the relief of world poverty.”
Earlier, a man had been charged with assaulting police by squirting tomato sauce, about 200 demonstrators were yelled at by police when they surrounded cars near Hyde Park and members of The Chaser TV comedy team were detained but quickly released after another APEC stunt. The protester arrest followed a clash between supporters of US President George W Bush and No-To-APEC demonstrators in Hyde Park. About a dozen members of Aussies 4 ANZUS walked their pro-Bush banner through 500 protesters at the No-to-APEC rally, where they were quickly met by jeers and flying tomato sauce. Police swarmed and riot squad officers arrested a man who witnesses said had squirted tomato sauce at the pro-Bush banner. The 37-year-old Queensland man was later charged with assaulting police, who were allegedly squirted with the sauce.
Later, there were minor scuffles when a protest involving around 50 bare-bottomed activists spilled onto Sydney streets, stalling an APEC motorcade…
The Australian Legend looked at nationalism and the Australian character and sought to trace the development of what Ward called the “national mystique”. Dictionaries define “character” as the traits and qualities that distinguish individual nature and “identity” as the state of having unique identifying characteristics. The “national character” and the “national identity”, then, are much the same thing.
Ward wrote that national character was a people’s idea of itself. Although this was often romanticised or exaggerated, it connected with reality in that it sprang from people’s experiences and coloured their ideas of how they ought to behave. According to the myth, Ward said, the “typical Australian” was “a practical man, rough and ready in his manners and quick to decry any appearance of affectation in others. He is a great improviser, ever willing ‘to have a go’ at anything, but … content with a task done in a way that is ‘near enough’. Though capable of great exertion in an emergency, he normally feels no impulse to work hard without good cause. He swears hard and consistently, gambles heavily and often, and drinks deeply on occasion …
“He is a ‘hard case’, sceptical about the value of religion and of intellectual and cultural pursuits generally. He believes that Jack is not only as good as his master but … probably a good deal better … He is a fiercely independent person who hates officiousness and authority … Yet he is very hospitable and … will stick to his mates through thick and thin, even if he thinks they may be in the wrong.”
The Order of Australia has been preserved and the importance of individual citizens taking personal responsibility for their potentially dangerous character has been reaffirmed today:
APEC blacklisters lose court challenge
Sydney Morning Herald
September 6, 2007Four men blacklisted by NSW police from attending any APEC protest have lost their appeal against the ban in an exceptional late-night court sitting in Sydney. The challenge was launched by the men – Dan Jones, Paddy Gibson, Dan Robbins and Tim Davis-Frank – who claimed the ban is unconstitutional… In the end the [three] justices [of the NSW Supreme Court] held that the banning of a limited number of potentially dangerous people from a protest, in a limited area, for a limited amount of time, served the legitimate end of responsible government.
Further words of wisdom…
1) It is to be remembered that the erosion of civil liberties occurred very gradually in South Africa. In 1948, before the Nationalist government took power, there was little difference in the laws and the attitudes of the people to those which you would find in most western countries. Changes in attitudes were gradually effected by propaganda (involving largely appeals to patriotism) and changes in the law. The fundamental proposition was that any person who did not agree with the changes to the laws was not a true patriot and an enemy of the people. Gradually, it became difficult to speak out without being faced with government and community opprobrium…
2) Almost every major reform in modern history – including the much vaunted Christian opposition to slavery – was opposed by both the organised churches and a majority of individual Christians…
3) Let me give you a word of the philosophy of reform. The whole history of the progress of human liberty shows that all concessions yet made to her august claims, have been born of earnest struggle. The conflict has been exciting, agitating, all-absorbing, and for the time being, putting all other tumults to silence. It must do this or it does nothing. If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters.
This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress… Men may not get all they pay for in this world; but they must certainly pay for all they get. If we ever get free from the oppressions and wrongs heaped upon us, we must pay for their removal. We must do this by labor, by suffering, by sacrifice, and if needs be, by our lives and the lives of others.

This is Jonny. He’ll be busy at Homebush today
Kara Lawrence (Police Reporter)
The Daily Telegraph
November 14, 2002
Police say it is an “appalling” image that proves anti-World Trade Organisation protesters have violence on their minds. This man — calling himself Jonny Hammerlock — volunteered to be photographed outside the disused cinema in Parrammatta Rd, Homebush Bay, that is being used as the headquarters for today’s anti-WTO protest…
Unprompted by The Daily Telegraph, “Jonny” donned a balaclava, removed his shirt, took a marijuana-smoking “bong” with water in it and stuffed a cloth into it — clearly imitating lighting a molotov cocktail…
As The Daily Telegraph yesterday approached the Midnight Star theatre [February to December 2002*] in Parramatta Rd, which acts as a base for protesters, few were willing to talk about the plans for the protest. When Jonny found out there was a media crew present, he said: “You’re all c…s.”
He denied us access into the building, shutting the security door and saying, “We have our orders.”
He later changed his mind, volunteering to be photographed, but would not be interviewed, saying, “I’m not a spokesperson.”
Fast forward almost five years:
‘I’ll be the one throwing rocks’
Lincoln Archer
Limited News
September 6, 2007
A MEMBER of a protest group involved in clashes with police around the world has said they are ready for violence at this week’s anti-APEC march through Sydney, as police issue dire warnings of the threat of crowd trouble.
The protester, whom NEWS.com.au will not name, is part of a group known as Black Bloc, whose members dress head to toe in black at anti-globalisation protests around the world. He has said he is prepared for violence to break out, but added the protesters also have a serious point to get across.
Similar groups include Arterial Bloc – whose members dress in white and are alleged to have been involved in violence at last year’s G20 protest in Melbourne – and Red Bloc, which is also planning to join the anti-APEC march.
He has said the bloc is not, as is widely reported, a single organisation but is instead a collection of smaller groups. He has said members block off streets, “un-arrest” people being taken away by police and give first aid to those injured in clashes – and can also engage in violence themselves.
“I know what to do in case of a riot, or police violence. If things turn rough and there’s a scuffle with the police, I can’t lie, I’d be one of the people throwing rocks,” he said.
“Most Black Bloc activity is peaceful, it’s just the few violent protests that gives Black Blocs a bad name. Black Bloc do dangerous things, yes, but in the struggle for a better world.”
Full-scale riot
The top riot squad officer in New South Wales, Chief Superintendent Stephen Cullen, told the state’s Supreme Court yesterday that a full-scale riot is “probable” and that he was braced for the worst violence of his career.
“Police lines will come under attack and a full-scale riot is probable,” he told the court during the hearing that has seen the protest march route moved away from the declared area in central Sydney.
The Black Bloc activist has said he is expecting the protest, planned for Saturday morning in central Sydney, to turn violent. And he has admitted part of him wants the rally to turn rough.
“A part of me does and a part of me doesn’t. There’s something in everyone that makes them want to riot.
“I’m worried about cops taking it too far. I’m worried about protesters taking it too far… But this is more important than just rioting. It’s about having our opinions heard.”
He has said the protesters have a right to show their dissent at what he called the “disgusting” policies of John Howard and George W. Bush.
“Everyone protesting is protesting because we have a sense of conscience and know that what people like Howard and Bush are doing is wrong. Wars for oil, keeping the poor poor, letting the world get more and more polluted until we’re pretty much screwed. It’s [disgusting.]”
But he has acknowledged that the strict security measures in place for the APEC summit will make it hard to be heard by those in power.
“World leaders will barely notice us because we’re being kept back so far, which is why we need try to our hardest to make a big noise and force them to listen. I’d settle for a peaceful protest resulting in protesters’ views being taken seriously.”
Media Release
AC/DC condemns police action in court today that led to march ban
September 5, 2007
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
In court today [Wednesday, September 5] police named the groups AC/DC, Mutiny, Arterial Bloc and the Socialist Party and said that they would be at the rally on Saturday and that this was a reason to refuse permission for Saturday’s planned protest route.
AC/DC condemns the linking of our name to threats of violence. The police are engaging in unfounded scare mongering and they are using this orchestrated smear campaign to undermine civil rights.
AC/DC is working with Stop Bush and Flare in the Void and other groups to enable a mobilisation on the basis of collective safety against police violence on Saturday.
“We have been working together to keep people safe from police violence,” said AC/DC spokesperson Liz Turner. She said “the police have a water cannon, they have erected massive concrete walls. These pose a major threat to public safety.”
Today Stop Bush said that they support civil disobedience. So does AC/DC. Liz Turner points out that “the result of the police actions today is that by simply participating in the march on Saturday everyone will be participating in civil disobedience”.
Liz Thompson went on to say that “Stop Bush has always maintained that the march will go ahead, whether it has a permit or not. We support this position.”
She went on to say that “as we have said all along, it is the police who have planned to use violence in the lead up to APEC. This stunt in court is the latest police action to deflect their own threat of violence onto the protesters and protest organisers. It won’t work. It is ridiculous to try and blame us for the broader violence of the policies of APEC and the NSW police.”
Liz Turner stated that “the NSW police are constructing urban militarism on the streets of Sydney and the people of Sydney won’t stand for it. People have the right to respond with anger.”
AC/DC would like journalists to note that police undermine the credibility of the evidence they presented to court today by naming Mutiny and Arterial Bloc.
AC/DC point out that Arterial Bloc only existed for a day in 2006 and [is] not an ongoing entity and that Mutiny are not involved in organising APEC protests. Either police are knowingly using these group’s names as paper tigers in an orchestrated smear campaign or they have a very poor quality of intelligence data.
We repeat, Arterial Bloc [does] not exist! Anyone who read their call-out in 2006 should know this.
“The social centre movement in Australia is a new concept. The most visible display began in earnest with a push from a group of activists galvanised by the example of the Broadway squats, Sydney 2000. The Social Centre Autonomous Network (SCAN) formed as a collection of self organised groups who make decisions through the network to occupy and organise around squatted social centres. SCAN aim to liberate property from real estate loop-holes, where owners sit on their properties, letting them rot away. SCAN wants to make spaces outside the boredom of work and consumption — spaces for creativity and social change beyond standard protests, like petitions and rallies…”
In reality, the practice of squatting buildings for ‘social’ as opposed to purely ‘private’ (residential) purposes has a long history. To cite one example, on January 1, 1987 (1987 having been designated International Year of Shelter for the Homeless) squatters occupied a disused cafe opposite Princess Pier in Port Melbourne. Subsequent activities included the usual array of meetings, workshops, benefit gigs, film screenings, performances, a cafe (needless to say!), etcetera.
Perhaps the only thing missing was ‘art’.
To cite another, more recent example: The Brown Warehouse in Wellington Street, Collingwood (now a yuppie apartment complex). First squatted in the late ’80s as a cafe and performance space, it was re-squatted in the mid- ’90s, and used for much the same purposes (Dropdead even played a gig there), at first providing temporary accommodation in the city for forest blockaders, later becoming a more permanent residential and social space.
In a related case, during the 1980s and into the early- ’90s, the Squatters Union of Victoria: maintained an office and meeting space (in an abandoned fire station in North Fitzroy); produced a radio show; distributed a bi-monthly zine (Squat It!), conducted a weekly community cafe; operated a telephone advice service; produced leaflets, stickers and various other forms of propaganda (in addition to the bi-monthly zine); organised benefit gigs; resisted evictions; and engaged in various other activities in solidarity with others engaged in workplace (for example, the BLF) and community struggles.

A spectre is haunting APEC — the spectre of sock monkeys. All the powers of APEC have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: President and Prime Minister, Rice and Downer, wildly-overpaid TV personalities and incompetent Australian police-spies. Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as sock monkeyistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of sock monkeyism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?
Two things result from this fact:
I. Sock monkeys are already acknowledged by all APEC powers to be in themselves a power.
II. It is high time that sock monkeys should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Sock Monkeyism with a manifesto of the party party party itself…
‘Full-scale riot likely’ in Sydney
Andrea Petrie
The Age
September 6, 2007POLICE are expecting up to 20,000 people to attend an anti-APEC protest in Sydney at the weekend and the state’s top riot officer told a NSW court yesterday there was likely to be a “full-scale riot”. Riot squad commander Steven Cullen told Sydney’s Supreme Court that officers were expecting large-scale violence. “Police lines will come under attack,” Chief Superintendent Cullen said. He said that while the organisers of the Saturday march, the Stop Bush Coalition, planned a peaceful protest, police believed sock monkeys were likely to incite violence as they had at Melbourne’s G20 riots last November…
Odd clothes and unorthodox views – why MI5 spied on Orwell for a decade
Stephen Bates
The Guardian
September 4, 2007
The extent to which Special Branch police monitored George Orwell as a suspected communist has been revealed in papers disclosed for the first time today at the National Archives in Kew. The documents, which include details of surveillance between the 1920s and 60s, indicate not only the wide range of groups and individuals being watched by police but also officers’ spectacular ability to misjudge what they saw. The obtuseness of some exasperated their superiors. A Sergeant Ewing of Special Branch, monitoring Orwell’s attempt to recruit Indians to work for the BBC’s India service in January 1942, noted: “This man has advanced communist views … He dresses in a bohemian fashion both at his office and in his leisure hours.”
…
A file from 1941 contains 13 pages of reports on a strike by dockyard apprentices in Chatham which followed a complaint about the standard of canteen food. It includes a report by Sergeant Ivan Smith of the Kent police, who hid himself in the gents’ toilet at a working men’s club in Gillingham to listen to the speakers at a union meeting: “I was unable to hear the majority of the proceedings owing to my obscure position in the lavatory and to the fact that a boy was standing in the cloakroom door the whole time,” it says. “I heard someone say that the best thing would be to have all the big fellows for that job [on the picket line]. The reply was that all present at the meeting should take their share and no shirking. The meeting closed at 1630 hours but I was unable to leave until 1655 as some of the apprentices were in the hall until that time.”
[Sergeant Ivan Smith of the Kent police sounds to have been about as competent as the two blokes from NSW who appeared at both the Forbes (April, 2005) protests in Sydney and the G20 (November, 2006) protests in Melbourne… But that’s another story.]

Sorry for the inconvenience, says Bush
ABC
September 5, 2007
US President George W Bush has apologised for any inconvenience caused by his Presidency. A security clampdown all over the world has been dramatically increased since the US President ordered US armed forces to invade Iraq four years ago. President Bush says he is sorry to the world’s peoples but asked that they recognise the possible violent threat they constitute. “To the extent that I’ve caused this I apologise,” he said. “I don’t want to come to a country and [have people] say, ‘what a pain it is to have the American President‘. Unfortunately however, this is what the authorities thought was necessary to protect people and … you live in a free market, people feel like they want to protest, fine. They can, unfortunately. And, evidently, some people may want to try to be violent in their protests.”

See also : Joseph Wakim, A tale of two unpopular fences, The Courier-Mail, September 6, 2007, comparing and contrasting the wall in Sydney with the wall in Palestine, which an Israeli court has recently ruled must be re-directed in Bilin, the “Palestinian village that has come to symbolize opposition to the enclosure”. Bilin has been the site of weekly protests involving Israelis and Palestinians, local villagers and people from the other side of the planet, for almost three years. For further discussion, see Eileen Fleming, The Power of Nonviolent Persistent People, Dissident Voice, September 5, 2007; and more generally, International Solidarity Movement on Bilin | Anarchists Against The Wall.